Saturday, August 23, 2014

British Woman Vows To Become First Female Jihadist To Kill American Or British Captive

 London: While the world expressed shock and grief at the brutal murder of American journalist James Foley, a female jihadist set Twitter aflutter by vowing to become the first female to behead a western prisoner in Syria.

Reports said that the jihadist in question - Khadijah Dare, is the 22-year-old mother of one who originally hails from Lewisham in south east London.

She moved to Syria in 2012 with her Swedish husband and ISIS fighter, Abu Bakr and is now looking to replicate the assassination of James Foley.

 Dare, whose Twitter name reads 'Muhajirah fi Sham' which means ‘immigrant in Syria’, posted a slang filled message that said, “Any links 4 da execution of da journalist plz. Allahu Akbar. UK must b shaking up ha ha. I wna b da 1st UK woman 2 kill a UK or US terorrist!(sic)”. 

She is believed to have converted to Islam in her mid-teens and her Twitter profile shows her toddler son posing with an AK47 rifle.

One of her shocking tweets reads: “All da people back in Dar ul kufr [land of disbelievers] what are you waiting for ... hurry up and join da caravan to where the laws of Allah is implemented.   

Another of her tweets says, “No one from Lewisham has come here apart from an 18-year-old sister shame on all those people who afford fancy meals and clothes and do not make hirja. Shame on you.”

Dare also expressed her delight in the execution of a Syrian man accused of rape by tweeting, “On da way 2 da market in Manbij, me and sum sisters was wonderin wat da commotion was all about ... On da way back frm da market, we see da body of a young man, with blood coin his nose ... tied onto a tree.”

The jihadist woman is reported to have been attached with the Lewisham Islamic Centre in the UK.

She met and married Abu Bakr, a Turkish militant in Sweden.

Officials Brace Ferguson For Shocking News

Not sure why no charges against the police officer would be shocking.
Check it out:
As darkness fell Thursday night, the few blocks of this St. Louis suburb that became the scene of nightly, often violent protests was calm as public officials milled about, assuring residents parallel investigations would reveal the circumstances of the fatal shooting of black teen Michael Brown by a white police officer.
It appeared many of the public figures were bracing the community for the possibility that Officer Darren Wilson would not be charged with murder as evidence continued to mount that he was attacked and severely beaten by Brown only minutes after the teen robbed a convenience store Aug. 9.
A St. Louis County Police Department officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told WND that department reports confirmed Wilson suffered a broken eye socket in a struggle with Brown before the shooting.

“For Michael Brown to fight the police officer and try to take his gun away and then to say, ‘Don’t shoot me,’ that’s resisting arrest, and it’s a felony,” he said. “All you have to do is touch the officer’s gun and you’ve committed a felony.”
As darkness settled in, the crowd grew to about one or two thousand people, but the atmosphere remained relaxed as State Highway Patrol troopers restricted motor traffic on West Florissant and kept pedestrians off the road. But police allowed access to the sidewalks, and a few peaceful protesters marched and chanted.
On the corner of West Florissant Avenue and Canfield Drive, near the site of the shooting, CNN’s Anderson Cooper conducted a live television broadcast from a curbside studio.
Continue Reading on ...

APPARENTLY YOU CAN’T PROTEST FOR THE COP’S RIGHTS: Darren Wilson Defender Attacked By Ferguson Mob

oped: It is truly time to educate the low information voters/ protestors who support Michael Brown /the Obama administration with emphasis on USAG Eric Holder...US History 101 fact: The KKK was established after the Civil War by non other than the Democratic party in the South. Now known as progressive democrats ! Fact the first slave owner in the USA was a black man...#BarackObama <[Anthony Johnson] and #EricHolder <[Overseerer] are the new Anthony Johnson's #Period y'all are the new slaves! 

It looks like Michael Brown supporters support only one point of view, namely … theirs. Check it out.
Unrest in Ferguson, Missouri was exacerbated on Wednesday night when Darren Wilson supporters showed up to a Michael Brown rally, sparking tensions.
The small group of pro-Wilson supporters arrived after dark in the rally area, with one woman in a rainbow-striped shirt holding up a sign criticizing the governor’s reaction to the police-shooting death: ‘Vigorous prosecution Jay Nixon? Justice is for everybody even P.O. Wilson’.

A video post to YouTube shows the woman and another man getting into a verbal argument with Brown protesters, before they were escorted from the scene by police. They are identified as Chuck and Dawn of St Louis, in the video’s caption.
It appears another woman came to the protest in defense of Wilson, according to the Washington Post which reported she was hit over the head while waving a ‘I support Darren Wilson’ sign and shouting, ‘Y’all need to get your facts straight’.
Police to rush to her side after she was hit, put her in a truck and drove her away.
Read more: Daily Mail

A “Subtle” Message to ISIS From a Ticked Off American Veteran

Screen Shot 2014-08-21 at 9
Message to ISIS: You really don’t want to pick a fight with America’s Veterans
Nick Powers, A military veteran has penned a brutally scathing message to the Islamic State militants in the Middle East who are slaughtering innocent men, women, and children.
It’s best to read his message in its entirety (Paragraph breaks added):

“As I sit here constantly hearing and watching you execute innocent men, women and children in the Middle East I chuckle. Why do I chuckle you may ask? Well let me explain something to you cowardice fools who think you are so tough behind all your propaganda videos. You are scaring a population that doesn’t know how to fight, you’re bullying the weak.
You say Islam is the religion of peace, but since when does terrorizing the innocent and beheading men, women and children constitute peace? WTF? But keep in mind, what did Saddam’s troops do when we came rolling into town? They surrendered, twice… So all your empty threats of coming to America and raising your flag over the White House amuse me more than any of you sick, sadistic bastards could ever imagine or comprehend.
In 2012 there was about 21.2 million veterans in the United States. Do you understand what that means? Let me break it down for you. That means there are literally millions of disgruntled, dysfunctional, pissed off veterans who have been dealing with years of abuse from their government stabbing them in the backs and having to watch their friends die because you Islamic extremist idiots can’t seem to act like normal human beings and stop terrorism and the violence.
It’s one thing to take over an Islamic state, but if my memory serves me correctly, I’m pretty sure we plowed through Fallujah in 4 days. Better yet, it took us about month to control your entire country. At this point, with 13+ years of war under our belts, how long do you think it would take us to do it all over again? I’ll let you draw your own conclusions on that one. Do you really think you stand a chance on US soil? Do you really think it would be smart to poke that bear? Remember, never bite the hand that feeds you.
Remember we are armed to the teeth in the US and I can promise you this… the Geneva Conventions will not apply to you. You attack us and there will be no mercy. We will bring the righteous hand of God down upon you and crush you. The ball is in your court now ISIS. We are more than ready to arrange your so called “meeting” with your 72 virgins and send you to your “prophet” Mohamed.”
– Nick Powers 

oped: Being a VietNam era veteran I second that emotion...there are also many Vn era vets who are also ticked off and still capable of giving a stiff resistance..all vets from WWII forward will join forces fix bayonets and kick some royal ass !  


Friday, August 22, 2014

Lots of Communication Between ISIS and Mexican Cartels

oped: This is quite obvious to anyone who has been paying Qaeda has been operating in alliance with the Mexican cartels since at least 2009 it started out as a monetary alliance to finance al Qaeda's mission in the ME... in the last three years a rash of beheadings of the competition and Law Enforcement officials began. The cartels always used execution shots to the head to let anyone who gets in their way know what their fate would be...The rash of beheadings is a clear indication they are taking lessons from al Qaeda on Sharia Law... shock and awe... executions to put fear in the competition and Law enforcement officials who would get in their way!

The Mexican government had better get a handle on this quickly lest they will be seeing a caliphate emerging within their borders! Not surprising ISIS "IS" is establishing a base in Mexico in which to launch operations against the USA and to establish a Caliphate in Mexico...and little known to the cartels they will be the first to go under the knife by their new buddies in crime...they also are infidels according to Islam!

What will liberals say now? How can they argue that not securing the border is in our best interest?

Former CIA covert operations officer Mike Baker said that he believes there is “a lot of communication” between ISIS and Mexican drug cartels given past efforts by al Qaeda to do likewise on Thursday’s “Laura Ingraham Show.”
“We’ve had good intel over the years about al Qaeda, about their efforts to coordinate with, as an example, Mexican cartels…in an effort to try to exploit our southern border” he reported, adding that a terrorist group like ISIS “absolutely” knows about the lack of security on the border.
Baker stated he believes there is “a lot of communication” between ISIS and drug cartels. And “the cartels are a business … if there’s a revenue stream they can exploit, then they will, and the extremists understand that.” 

Continue Reading on ...

Gun-Hating Bloomberg Tried To Destroy This Pro-Gun Sheriff And It Blew Up In His Face

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, Jr. triumphed in a recent primary as a New York Mayor hopeful, gaining favor as a strong pro-gun advocate. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a known anti-gun crusader, donated $150,000 in support of Clarke’s opponent, hoping it would aid in Clarke’s defeat. Clearly, he was mistaken.
Via TheBlaze

Appearing on “Fox & Friends” Thursday, Clarke said Bloomberg’s plan to “spread a few hundred thousand dollars” in his “anti-gun crusade” to beat him failed miserably. Bloomberg’s super PAC, Independence USA, spent about $150,000 to air ads attacking Clarke’s pro-Second Amendment views.
“Mayor Bloomberg made a huge miscalculation,” Clarke said in the interview. “He didn’t understand the political climate on the ground here in Milwaukee County. I have a lot of support for my position on support for the Second Amendment, for people to be able to defend themselves and the pro-gun movement.”
Clarke has been rising in popularity ever since he publicly encouraged citizens to protect themselves by owning firearms. Additionally, his speech at the NRA convention this year on the Second Amendment gained him a standing ovation and many supporters.

2nd Amendment Map: Where ‘Open Carry’ is Legal

  • By
  • Rani Molla 
  • As people on both sides of the debate regarding open carry—the practice of carrying firearms in plain view—have been turning up the heat, more companies are being forced to take a side.
    Gun-rights advocates see the practice as a way to normalize gun ownership and deter crime, while gun-control activists believe carrying guns in stores and restaurants is disruptive to the public and encourages violence.
    Recently, TargetStarbucks and Chipotle have asked their patrons not to bring their guns. After petitions by gun-control groups such as Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, Kroger said it would uphold local and state laws in the 34 states it operates.
    Carrying a firearm in a concealed manner is legal in all states, but open carry has more restrictions, especially for handguns. Though federal law doesn’t restrict the open carrying of handguns in public, several states—including California, Florida, Illinois, New York, South Carolina and Texas—ban the practice, according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Thirteen states require a special permit or license to open carry. The remaining 31 states don’t require one. The laws are different for long guns, which are commonly associated with hunting.  

    In a Thursday, Jan. 12, 2012 photo, Rick Ector carries his Smith and Wesson 9mm as he prepares to pump gas in Detroit. Ector is pushing to make Detroit an “open carry” city and organizes public dinners and picnics where each legally licensed attendee wears a handgun. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
    Why is open carry causing so much of a stir when concealed carry is so widespread?
    “Concealed carry—you don’t know who’s doing it and it doesn’t cause as much concern as open carry,” said Laura Cutilletta, senior staff attorney at the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. “One is a danger you know, and one is a danger you don’t know.”
    According to Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action,”The National Rifle Association strongly supports conceal carry and open carry, and we will continue to lead the charge to protect and expand the right to self defense for law abiding Americans throughout the country.”

How Responsible Are Michael Brown’s Parents for His Demise?

Patricia Dickson 

As the events in Ferguson, MO, continue to unfold, we learn yet again that a young black teenager tragically lost his life. While we do not have all the facts as to the events that transpired just before the Ferguson police officer shot and killed young Michael Brown, it is clear from what the media is reporting that all the blame for his death will be placed on Officer Darren Wilson.  To my knowledge, neither his mother nor his father has been asked publicly about their whereabouts or their son’s actions on that day. Do the parents not share the bulk of the blame for the demise of this young man? While we wait for all the facts to come in, can we at least have an honest discussion about the role that parents play in the untimely demise of young men like Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin?
It is clear by the video images showing Michael Brown grabbing a much older and smaller store clerk by the throat that the young man did not have respect for authority. The fact that there was some kind of confrontation with a police officer reveals that this young man had issues with authority. The first authority figure in a child’s life is the parent. If parents do not teach and demand that children respect them, there is a good chance that the child will not respect any other person in authority (e.g., teachers, police, and other adults).

No one in the media dare ask Lesley McSpadden, Michael Brown’s mother, about the video images of her son while she’s making the rounds on all the network shows demanding justice for his death. Sybrina Fulton, Trayvon Martin’s mother, is back on the scene to offer her advice to Brown’s mother. Instead of asking these women some straightforward questions about their role in their son’s behavior that led up to their tragic deaths, the media is portraying them as Mary, the mother of Jesus. Even Brown’s grandfather has been on a network show asking President Obama to meet with him and demanding justice for his grandson.
Where was he when his grandson was stealing cigars from the corner store? With all of these parental figures coming forward, it would seem that someone would have taken the time to discipline this young man. Growing up as a child, my parents told me that they whipped my behind so that the police would not have to. The Bible states in Proverbs 29:15: The rod and reproof give wisdom, but a child left undisciplined brings his mother to shame.
The parents are the ones that failed young Michael Brown.

The media, along with the likes of Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and the New Black Panthers, are doing a disservice to young black men by portraying those like Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin as martyrs and saints. Attorney General Eric Holder wanted to keep Michael Brown’s robbery videos hidden from the public. Pointing the finger at police officers and painting them as racist, while at the same time not condemning or even mentioning the young man’s behavior, sends a message to other black teens that Brown’s and Martin’s actions are appropriate.
In other words, it is irresponsible for the media and race baiters to create false narratives portraying undisciplined young black teens as angels in order to push their agenda. How is that helpful to other poor single black mothers trying to raise young boys? Ignoring criminal behavior in order to point fingers at others only encourages other young black teens to emulate the same behavior. How is it beneficial to the black community for parents not to be held accountable for their child’s behavior?

It is obvious that the the media and the likes of Sharpton don’t care anything about the dead black teenager or his parents. If they are genuinely concerned, where are they when hundreds of poor black teenagers are killed monthly in the inner cities across America?  How many more black teens do we want to see killed by not only the police, but also by other blacks?
I am tired of reading and listening to all the media pundits blaming everything and everybody except the parents for the death of young Michael Brown. He was not an orphan. I do not doubt that he could have had a bright future. However, we cannot gloss over his criminal behavior by claiming that the police are trying to damage his reputation. The video images speaks for themselves.  We cannot continue to excuse criminal behavior by claiming poverty and inequality. It is long past time for parents to take responsibility for their children’s behavior instead of showing up demanding justice and blaming others after their deaths.

ISIS Strategizing To ‘Blow Up’ U.S. City

Wonder if this would get Obama to pay attention?

The ranking Republican on the Armed Services Committee in the U.S. Senate is warning that ISIS terrorists, those who this week beheaded an American journalist, are trying to develop the capability of blowing up an entire American city.
The comments from Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., came in an interview with the Fox affiliate in Oklahoma City.
He said the U.S. now is in “the most dangerous position we’ve ever been in.”
Responding to questions about terror and the threat facing Americans, he said: “They’re crazy out there. And they are rapidly developing a method of blowing up a major U.S. city. You just can’t believe that’s happening.”

He told the station the threat is significant, and he blamed it on the cuts in defense spending made by President Obama.
“He’s going to have to come up with something we’re going to do because they’re holding another hostage … and the problem is the president, he says all these things and he never does them.”
ISIS members, he said, are “really bad terrorists.”
“They’re so bad that al-Qaida’s afraid of them.” 

Continue Reading on ...

Foley Rescue Attempt Failed Because Obama ‘Dragged His Feet’

Obama doesn’t have the backbone to lead America.

Thursday morning, Shaffer appeared on WMAL radio in Washington, D.C., to discuss the ISIS execution of American journalist James Foley earlier this week.
He told me and co-host Brian Wilson that the recently revealed rescue attempt led by Special Forces earlier this summer failed because President Obama was slow to give the go-ahead:
I’m hearing from my friends in the Pentagon, they are giving him every single option way ahead of time. And let me give you a little secret here: The reason that raid into Syria failed to get Foley and those guys was because the president drug his feet. He waited too long, the intel got stale, and by the time we actually gave the “go” word it failed because we just didn’t react quick enough.  

Continue Reading on ...

The Rise of Anti-Semitism Among Liberals

"The paradox of anti-Semitism is that it is invariably up to the Jews to explain away the charges.  The anti-Semite simply has to make them."  --Jack Schwartz
Leon Klinghoffer & an Anti-Semitic Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing
Leon Klinghoffer was a Jew shot by terrorist members of the Palestinian Liberation Front aboard the passenger liner Achille Lauro and dumped from his wheelchair into the Mediterranean.  He was murdered for being Jewish.
“The Death of Klinghoffer” is an anti-Semitic American opera.  It was first produced in Brussels, Belgium, and New York City, USA, in 1991.  It is based on the hijacking of the Achille Lauro in 1985 and the Klinghoffer murder that took place on board, but it is anti-Jewish revisionism that depicts the evil Palestinians as the real victims and accuses Klinghoffer’s wife of being the true slayer of her husband for insurance money. 

Liberal Hate Speech
This money-hungry stereotype of Jews will endear this opera to Islamists, and its American origin will legitimize it, since liberals, such as the writers of this opera, are surely broad-minded and fair on the subject of Jews, right?
The truth is that “liberals” are anything but philo-Semites: witness the anti-Semitism of Occupy Wall Street and the Obama Administration's repeated naming of Israel as an apartheid state.
All of this has worked to embolden CAIR (the American face of Hamas) and its efforts in its BDS campaign (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) against Israel.  The failure of Democrats to speak out against these harms, coupled with liberal media failure to report them, has left American Jewry at a tremendous disadvantage.

Progressive Art: Renewing the Legitimization of Evil
On November 15th, 2014, the Metropolitan Opera, the largest classical music organization in North America, had plans for simulcasting “The Death of Klinghoffer” to 66 nations!  Eventually, the Jewish outrage brought to bear was just enough to shut the simulcast down.  However, the Met is going forward with the rest of its production plans, no holds barred!
This is truly a sad state of affairs, as it will spread, once again, the false Palestinian claim that Klinghoffer’s widow is a greedy, Jewish murderess.  The Islamic world uses these fictionalized dramatizations to legitimize the writing of anti-Semitic revisionist history.  This latest anti-Jewish libel will, eventually, have an impact on the entire Jewish people.  How immoral, and how tragic!  It was bad enough that this opera was written in the first place, without the Metropolitan Opera's becoming a messenger for Islamist ideals.

Following the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, the Boston Symphony Orchestra cancelled a performance of excerpts from the opera scheduled for November 2001, because a member of the Tanglewood Festival Chorus had lost a family member on one of the hijacked planes.  But in the current environment of an ultra-liberal, anti-Semitic media, this opera is eminently doable.  Letting it go forward, without any denunciation from any liberal Democrat anywhere, also sends a strong message to anti-Semitic Islamists (now a growing community of voters): We, the Democrats, are your party. 

With Great Freedom Comes Great Responsibility
We have a near-unfettered freedom of speech in our country, a good thing to be sure, but with great freedom does come great responsibility.  And the subject matter for this opera is beyond irresponsible; it is no less than the beginning of a cultural suicide within the Met.  All of the values being expressed are upside-down with regard to any civilized ethical standard.  There is a romanticization of Jew-hatred deeply embedded in this opera.

Anti-Semitism & Anti-Americanism, Brought to You by Team Obama
occupyToday, in an America where 34% of the country approves of President Obama’s release of the Taliban Dream Team from Guantanamo Bay, we are all in trouble.  Anti-Semitism is on the rise, and President Obama has been giving weapons to Qatar, Hamas’ weapons supplier, to thwart the efforts of Israel in its war against terrorists.  As anti-Semitism increases, so does the endangerment of traditional American values, those values whose dissemination protects all Americans from the injustices now being fueled by liberal progressives against Jews.
Also, the growth of the Islamic State has been brought about by its leader, Caliph Ibrahim, who was a prisoner at Camp Bucca, Iraq, until Obama had him released.  With anti-Americanism in his eyes, he told his former captors, as he was leaving, “See you guys in New York!”

Responsible Information & Enforcement of the US Constitution
The best defense of American Jews against anti-Semitism's bubbling up into government is for Jews to inform themselves responsibly and to insist on the Constitution's being enforced as the law of the land.  A dictatorial chief executive who goes around the Congress to make law should be rebuked by the Jewish community.  The Constitution is important as a limitation on government, to ensure that ideas such as anti-Semitism are not allowed any kind of official status.  An anti-Semitic government, unhinged from the Constitution and headed by a scofflaw chief executive, can only be a nightmare government, not only for Jews, but for all Americans.

Supporting traditional American values is, in fact, a very Jewish thing to do, since these values all have as their basis ethical Judaism (thus the term Judeo-Christian values).  Haym Solomon was an early American patriot who helped to finance the American Revolution.  He immigrated to New York from Poland and helped to convert French loans into ready cash by selling bills of exchange for Robert Morris, the Superintendent of Finance. 

Solomon advanced direct loans to the government and gave generously of his own resources to pay the salaries of government officials and army officers.  It appears that Solomon never requested repayment of the loans.  His early support of American ideals played an important role in the establishment of the country, ultimately helping to lay the foundation for the encoding of its highest ideals in the US Constitution.
America has, historically, been exceptional in its promotion of what is good and right.  Let us all strive together as Americans to make sure that this tradition continues.  And, for a fact-based opera about a Jew, might I suggest somebody write “The Haym Solomon Story”?


America Now Ruled by Rioters?


It's apparently official.
America is no longer governed by the Rule of Law, but by political intrigue and media hype.
Rioters in Ferguson, Missouri, are pulling the strings which may, in fact, ensnare an innocent police officer, who encountered a 6' 4" 290 pound marijuana-laced young man, who minutes before had assaulted and robbed a convenience store worker. Not many outside the NFL could defend effectively against that size person.
The governor of Missouri, a Democrat, made a video statement apparently pushing for - "...prosecuting..." the police officer, even though the facts are not yet known. This pleases the black population, who use riots and violence to demand no violence be done to them under any circumstances. 

Black "leaders," Democrats -- really men who make their living shaking down opponents while riling up the Democratic vote - were on scene sympathizing.
US Attorney General, a Democrat, ignores the murder capital of the US, Chicago, where young black men are killing other young black men at record rates - seven last weekend. But that doesn't involve any whites so it is dismissed. But he goes to Ferguson to do what? the notion that a white police officer, dealing with a difficult situation was motivated by racism, rather than fear for his life.

The US southern border is thrown open to terrorists, criminals/illegals and anyone else who has a desire to break into the USA, against its laws, to steal  - or kill. This pleases the 20-30 million criminals/illegals, most from Mexico, already being supported by US taxpayers, who will continue to vote for the Democrats.
These criminals/illegals themselves subvert the law as they undermined many aspects of US custom and civility. Their reaction to a gang member being killed by police two years ago in Anaheim, CA, was the same as in Ferguson...riots. That's the one is liable for his/her actions....the police are always overreacting. And maybe they are sometimes. However, these days certain groups favored by the Democrats are always right, even when they are clearly not.
Meanwhile, Los Angeles professional basketball fans were delighted to join in the raucous celebration by the Clippers new owner, who purchased the team even though the previous owner did not want to sell. A liberal media, combined with political correctness gone berserk, publicly flayed Donald Sterling.

donald sterling
Somehow, former Clippers owner Donald Sterling's personal benign comments, in his own home, on who he didn't want his girlfriend to bring to games, which she illegally recorded and made available to sleazy TV gossip show, caused his property to be confiscated. And sold off - at a profit, to be sure, but none the less, against Sterling's will.
Americans need to focus on this  - an American citizen's property was essentially confiscated through political pressure to punish him for private thoughts and comments in his own home.
Great outrage ensued because his comments were deemed, by the commissioner and others in his camp, as racist. Sterling did nothing illegal. In fact, his comments were odd, and rather bland.

The commissioner of the professional basketball league expressed profound outrage at Sterling's private - not public - comments and acted immediately to ban Sterling from participation in the league, fined him more than a million dollars, and caused him to ultimately surrender his property - the Clippers basketball team.
However, there apparently was little outrage by the commissioner or professional basketball in general, over the culture of criminal off-the-court behaviors by players as illuminated in news reports and the well-researched book, "Out of Bounds."
Those accused of various crimes were not forced to surrender their property nor did they lose their jobs. But then, they are members of one of the favored groups that support Democrats.
It should be noted...that while the current administration focuses attention on Ferguson, the myriad of administration's scandals - IRS, NSA, Benghazi, etc., are pushed off the front pages of media reporting.
And for Democrats, that's a good thing.
Not so much for America and its citizens.

jihadi subculture after beheading video

By Kate Holton and Raheem Salman

LONDON/BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A British Muslim leader called for action on Thursday to tackle a jihadi sub-culture after an Islamic State video showed a suspected Briton beheading U.S. journalist James Foley, held hostage in Syria. 

In Washington, U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the threat from Islamic State was "beyond anything we've seen" and the U.S. Justice Department opened a criminal investigation into the death of Foley on the video, which featured a masked man speaking English with a British accent.

As Western officials tried to identify the man, the Muslim Council of Britain denounced Foley's "abhorrent murder" and one of its advisers urged anyone who knows the killer's identity to contact the police.
Horror at the video spanned from the West to Baghdad, where Iraqis asked why the United States and its allies had not cracked down on Islamic State fighters long before they captured large areas of Syria and Iraq.
Foley, 40, was beheaded by an Islamic State militant in the video that surfaced on the Internet on Tuesday, and officials in Washington revealed that U.S. special forces had tried unsuccessfully to rescue him along with other American hostages earlier this summer.

A firefight between the U.S. forces and Islamic State militants during the rescue attempt appeared to be the first direct ground engagement between the two sides.
The video caused particular shock in Britain, which is home to about 2.7 million Muslims, although the hundreds of British men fighting alongside the militants in Iraq and Syria have created concern for some time.

Iqbal Sacranie, an adviser to the Muslim Council of Britain, said Britons from across the country's communities had to stop young men being seduced by radical ideologies.
"This sub culture of this 'jihadi-cool' - as they call it in the media - within the margins of society ... that is the real challenge," he told BBC Radio. "This is a problem that affects all of us and it will only be dealt with more effectively if all of us are working together on this."
Sacranie said the Muslim community was pushing the message that "this is totally alien to Islam" and families were reporting to the authorities when they discovered their sons had headed to the Middle East to fight. He also told London's Evening Standard newspaper that anyone who recognized the man in the video had a duty to contact police.

The Guardian newspaper said a former hostage had identified the masked man as the leader of three Britons who guarded foreign hostages in the city of Raqqa - Islamic State's stronghold in eastern Syria.
The BBC also reported that hostages had nicknamed their three captors John, Paul and Ringo, after members of the Beatles pop group.

Ghaffar Hussain, managing director of the counter-extremism Quilliam Foundation, said it was almost inevitable that men who had fought in Syria would return to plan attacks in Europe.
"It is disturbing that people born and raised in Britain and who have gone to the same schools as us could have been essentially indoctrinated to the extent where they can justify raping women and chopping heads off," he said.
Four British Islamists - two of whom had been to al Qaeda training camps in Pakistan - killed 52 people in suicide bomb attacks on London in July 2005, and Britons have previously appeared in graphic Islamist videos.

Until recently, Islamic State concentrated on establishing its self-proclaimed caliphate in areas of Syria and Iraq it had seized rather than on attacking the West, like al Qaeda - the group from which it split.
But U.S. President Barack Obama's decision to order air strikes on its fighters in Iraq appears to have changed this. The beheading video also showed images of another U.S. journalist, Steven Sotloff, whose fate the group said depends on how the United States acts in Iraq. "The life of this American citizen, Obama, depends on your next decision," the masked man says.
In a Washington briefing on Thursday, Hagel said Islamic State was as sophisticated as any group the United States had seen and posed an imminent threat "to every interest we have, whether it's in Iraq or anywhere else."

"They are beyond just a terrorist group. They marry ideology, a sophistication of ... military prowess," Hagel said. "They are tremendously well-funded. This is beyond anything we've seen."
General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, suggested Islamic State would be a danger until it could no longer count on safe havens in Syria.
"This is an organization that has an apocalyptic, end-of- days strategic vision and which will eventually have to be defeated," Dempsey said.

"To your question, can they be defeated without addressing that part of their organization which resides in Syria? The answer is no. That will have to be addressed on both sides of what is essentially at this point a non-existent border."
In Baghdad, Iraqis expressed their horror at the video of Foley's killing and questioned Western strategy on Islamic State, which advanced out of Syria in June to capture several major Iraqi cities, including Mosul, before the United States intervened militarily.
"The killing is the crime of all crimes, whoever the victim is," said Kareem Jamal, 55, an Arabic language teacher at a secondary school.
"I wish the world superpowers had fought these criminal groups in their incubators. The U.S. should have hit Islamic State when they first appeared in Syria. Why didn’t they hit them when they first entered Mosul and other cities?"

Ali Mohammed Saeed, a 35-year-old doctor, called for deeper Western involvement, almost three years after U.S. troops pulled out of Iraq. "Air strikes are not enough, those criminals need ground troops to kill them and kick them out."
British Prime Minister David Cameron has ruled out sending troops to step up Britain's military involvement in Iraq, which has so far been focused on delivering supplies to Kurdish forces fighting Islamic State and using jets to conduct surveillance.
(Additional reporting by Julia Edwards, Missy Ryan, Steve Holland and David Alexander in Washington and William James in London; Writing by David Stamp; editing by Philippa Fletcher and Gunna Dickson)

Americans among 12,000 foreign fighters in Syria: US

A jihadist believed to be a 20-year-old man from Cardiff, Wales, speaks in an online jihadist recruitment video on June 19, 2014. (AFP)
Washington (AFP) - Some 12,000 foreign jihadists from 50 countries, including Americans, have gone to fight in Syria since the conflict began, the US State Department said Thursday.
A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, estimated that more than 100 US citizens have traveled or tried to travel to Syria to join the conflict. 

They have traveled to join radical groups including the Islamic State (IS), militants fighting the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria who have expanded into neighboring Iraq.
"We think that there are approximately 12,000 fighters from at least 50 countries in Syria -- foreign fighters, including a small number of Americans -- that may have traveled to Syria since the beginning of the conflict" more than three years ago, said deputy State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf.
"They may all not still be there," she said, without revealing an estimated number of Americans.
US officials have been unable to identify an organized recruitment effort aimed at US citizens, as is the case in Europe. 

Washington has publicly stated that Western fighters pose an especially dangerous risk, especially when they return to their countries of origin.
In late September, President Barack Obama is scheduled to host a Security Council summit with other heads of state focusing on the acute threat posed by foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq.
During his August 12 visit to Sydney, Secretary of State John Kerry said that Washington and Australia agreed to take concerns about the threat posed by jihadist foreign fighters in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere to the United Nations.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Eric Holder Just Proved, In His Own Words, Why He Should Butt Out Of The Ferguson Investigation

Should AG Eric Holder be fired?

“I am the Attorney General of the United States, but I am also a black man.” With that revealing statement, as reported in USA Today. Eric Holder showed exactly why he should not be involved in any way with the racially charged Ferguson incident. Holder is, by his own admission, too emotionally invested in the racial aspects of this disturbing investigation.
As the nation’s chief law enforcement officer, the Attorney General of the United States should be completely impartial and unbiased. Yet this Attorney General — who has freely and proudly acknowledged that he is an “activist” — now clearly thrusts himself, personally and provocatively, into the Ferguson mess.
This excerpt from the article in USA Today, entitled “Holder’s Stop in Ferguson is Deeply Personal”, should be enough for any thinking person to call for Holder to disqualify and distance himself from the animosities in Ferguson:

“I am the Attorney General of the United States, but I am also a black man,” Holder told Ferguson residents at a community meeting. “I can remember being stopped on the New Jersey turnpike on two occasions and accused of speeding. Pulled over. … ‘Let me search your car’ … Go through the trunk of my car, look under the seats and all this kind of stuff. I remember how humiliating that was and how angry I was and the impact it had on me.”
It is transparently ridiculous for Holder to bring his race-based prejudices into a situation that, in light of the heightened tensions, calls for a squeaky clean, fair, and impartial administration of justice.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Nonwhite Cop Kills Unarmed, White Youth – National Media, AG and POTUS Ignore

A brutal natural experiment is underway demonstrating the role of race, riots, and radicals in determining whose death is noted, and whose ignored in racialized America when unarmed young men are shot and killed by police.  While American and world media, along with the President and Attorney General of the United States,  obsess over the death of Michael Brown at the hands of the Ferguson, Missouri police, few people outside of Utah have heard of the remarkably parallel and contemporaneous death of Dillon Taylor, an unarmed young man (and father-to-be) from a gun shot by a Salt Lake City policeman, whose name has not been released, but who has been identified the SLC chief of police as nonwhite.
Here are the bare facts of the death of Dillon Taylor, via KUTV, Salt Lake: 

Dillon Taylor, 20, who is from Salt Lake, was exiting 7-Eleven with his brother and cousin, Adam Thayne, around 7 p.m. on Monday, when Salt Lake City police arrived, responding to a report of a man waving a gun in the area.
The officers ordered the men to the ground. Two of them complied, but Dillon, who police say matched the suspect’s description, did not go down.
“It came in as a 911 call that there was a man with a gun,” said South Salt Lake Police Sgt. Darrin Sweeten. “He was verbally challenged and ultimately was shot.”
Sweeten did not release further details on the shooting….

No one has suggested that Taylor was involved in the commission of any crime, unlike Brown who was captured on surveillance camera robbing a convenience store shortly before his death.
Read More: 

Dillon's brother and cousin claim they were on their way to visit his parents' graves and that Dillon was surprised by the police presence. He was not aggressive, they said.

"He had headphones in, and he couldn't hear [anything], and then they finally surrounded him," Jerrail said. "They're like, 'Get on the ground,' and [he] pulled up his pants and [they] shot him."

Thayne believes police might have thought his cousin was reaching for a gun when, in reality, he grabbed his cell phone.

"I was in shock, because he was wearing a white t-shirt and there was blood all over it," Thayne said. "They ran up and handcuffed him. He wasn't moving."

A witness's video shows police yelling for the two men to remain on the ground as Thayne repeatedly screams that they have shot his cousin.

The two men were taken to the police station, but released hours later without being charged or cited. 

Unlike the Ferguson Police, Salt Lake City Police wear body video cameras, so footage of the entire incident is available to the police and the chief of police has watched it.  But so far there has been no release of the tape.
[Chief of PoliceChris] Burbank has watched the video but would not comment on whether he thought the Aug. 11 shooting in a 7-Eleven parking lot was justified. Burbank also would not comment on whether the 20-year-old Taylor had a gun. The man's family has said he was not armed.
And while friends of Taylor and some others have protested the shooting, there have been no riots or violence, no radicals streaming in to agitate, no national media interest at all, and complete indifference from the AG and POTUS, in stark contrast to their concern for the late strong-arm robber Michael Brown.
It is hard to escape the conclusion that some unarmed victims of police shooting are more important to the political and media leadership of America than others.
For the record, Taylor is what the New York Times would call a “white Hispanic”:
Taylor's brother, Jerrail Taylor, raised issues last week about racial profiling. He said his brother was Hispanic.

As with the case of George Zimmerman, Hispanic grievance groups have remained silent.
Hat tip: Jack Hellner

THE BRITISH BUTCHER: Hunt For The Masked Muslim Butcher Identified as ‘John’ In James Foley Video

A member of ISIS from the UK? Well, that’s where tolerance gets the Brits. See below…
The British fanatic who beheaded an American journalist will be identified and the SAS will be sent to Syria to ‘bring him to justice’, a former MI6 chief said today.
Richard Barrett, who was head of counter-terrorism for the security services at the time of 9/11, said he is convinced the murderer – now considered the world’s most wanted man – will be arrested and taken back to Britain for trial ‘sooner or later’.
The suspect was last night named as ‘John’ one of a gang of British jihadis known as ‘The Beatles’ who are guarding western hostages for ISIS.

Mr Barratt told the Today Programme: ‘They will be able to identify him, although there are four or five hundred people who have gone from all over the United Kingdom many of them have made their presence there known, and I think the community will be able recognise this person and I am sure many in the community will be keen to do so.
‘I mean the intelligence community certainly but also the community from which this man comes, he will have had many acquaintances and friends in the United Kingdom and those people will wish to see him brought to justice.’
He agreed that once he is identified the course of action would likely be to send special forces to grab him.
oped: or terminate the SOB! 

He added: ‘This is probably a relatively young man and he has a relatively long life ahead of him, perhaps, if he doesn’t get killed quickly in Iraq or Syria and therefore sooner or later he is going to be vulnerable to arrest or some sort interdiction and brought before the “I don’t think anyone is prepared to forget this sort of crime and therefore the long arm of justice will eventually catch him.’
Read more: Daily Mail

THE GOLFER-IN-CHIEF: Outrage Over Obama Golfing 4 Mins After Condemning The Beheading Of James Foley

Screen Shot 2014-08-21 at 8.20.16 AM
oped: Enough is enough of the poser POTUS...he and his ship mate Michelle have milked the US treasury enough on their Royal Welfare vacation over the last is past due time for congress to remove this fraud before anymore damage can be done to the USA
Must we endure another 911 before congress and the people wake up to the fact that his entire presidency has been a fraud, filled with scandal after scandal ?...and the enabling of radical Islam to thrive..Obama  has 6 MB cabinet Czars in his administration for God's sake...are ya all that dense?

Why doesn’t this bother Liberals?  They had a fit when Bush went to his ranch even though he quit golfing after the surge. .  
President Barack Obama reacted to the on-camera slaying of photojournalist James Foley for five minutes on Wednesday, telling a global audience that ‘when people harm Americans, anywhere, we do what’s necessary to see that justice is done.’
Almost immediately after leaving the podium Obama teed-off and was seen laughing with friends and fist-bumping them during a five-hour round at Farm Neck Golf Course on Martha’s Vineyard – his seventh 18-holes in ten days.

The decision brought a chorus of condemnation from TV commentators, journalists, conservative partisans and Twitter users.
Retired U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Peters could hardly contain his anger Wednesday night on the Fox News Channel as he discussed Obama’s reactions to the ISIS terror network’s beheading of Foley, an American who had been missing since 2012.
‘There is no way the president should be stupid enough to go play golf’ after such a somber speech, Peters said.
‘Not only did he insult the Foley family; he sent a message to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (the leader of ISIS) and all of the other jihadi terrorist militants – now soldiers of a jihadi army – that he doesn’t take it all seriously.’
Read more: Daily Mail

An Open Letter to Captain Ronald S. Johnson~From a former St. Louis Metro Area police chief

by: Chief Ed Delmore 
I have to call you out.
I don’t care what the media says. I expect them to get it wrong and they often do. But I expect you as a veteran law enforcement commander—talking about law enforcement—to get it right.
Unfortunately, you blew it. After days of rioting and looting, last Thursday you were given command of all law enforcement operations in Ferguson by Governor Jay Nixon. St. Louis County PD was out, you were in. You played to the cameras, walked with the protestors and promised a kinder, gentler response. You were a media darling. And Thursday night things were better, much better.
But Friday, under significant pressure to do so, the Ferguson Police released the name of the officer involved in the shooting of Michael Brown. At the same time the Ferguson Police Chief released a video showing Brown committing a strong-arm robbery just 10 minutes before he was confronted by Officer Darren Wilson.

Many don’t like the timing of the release of the video. I don’t like that timing either. It should have been released sooner. It should have been released the moment FPD realized that Brown was the suspect.
Captain Johnson, your words during the day on Friday helped to fuel the anger that was still churning just below the surface. St. Louis County Police were told to remain uninvolved and that night the rioting and looting began again. For much too long it went on mostly unchecked. Retired St. Louis County Police Chief Tim Fitch tweeted that your “hug-a-looter” policy had failed.

Boy did it.
And your words contributed to what happened Friday night and on into the wee hours of Saturday. According to the St. Louis Post Dispatch, you said the following regarding the release of the video: “There was no need to release it,” Johnson said calling the reported theft and the killing entirely different events.
Well Captain, this veteran police officer feels the need to respond. What you said is, in common police vernacular—bullshit. The fact that Brown knew he had just committed a robbery before he was stopped by Officer Wilson speaks to Brown’s mindset. And Captain, the mindset of a person being stopped by a police officer means everything, and you know it.
Let’s consider a few examples:
On February 15, 1978 Pensacola Police Officer David Lee conducted a vehicle check. He didn’t know what the sole occupant of the vehicle had recently done, but the occupant did. Who was he? Serial killer Ted Bundy. Bundy attempted to disarm Lee. Lee was able to retain his firearm and eventually took Bundy into custody.
On April 19, 1995 Oklahoma State Trooper Charlie Hangar stopped a vehicle for minor traffic violations. He didn’t know that 90 minutes earlier the traffic violator, Timothy McVeigh, killed 168 people with a truck bomb at the Murrah Federal Building. But McVeigh sure knew it, didn’t he? Fortunately, given his training and experience Hangar was able to take McVeigh into custody for carrying a concealed firearm. It was days later before it was determined that McVeigh was responsible for the bombing.

On May 31, 2003 then-rookie North Carolina police officer, Jeff Postell, arrested a man digging in a trash bin on a grocery store parking lot—an infraction that would rise to about the level of jaywalking. Postell didn’t know that he had just captured Eric Rudolph, the man whom years earlier had killed and injured numerous people with bombs and was on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list.
So now, let’s consider Ferguson Officer Darren Wilson’s stop of Michael Brown. Apparently Wilson didn’t know that Brown had just committed a strong-arm robbery. But Brown did! And that Captain, is huge.
Allegedly, Brown pushed Wilson and attempted to take Wilson’s gun. We’re also being told that Officer Wilson has facial injuries suffered during the attempt by Brown to disarm him. Let’s assume for a moment those alleged acts by Brown actually occurred. Would Brown have responded violently to an officer confronting him about jaywalking? Maybe, but probably not.
Is it more likely that he would attack an officer believing that he was about to be taken into custody for a felony strong-arm robbery? Absolutely.

Officer Wilson survived the encounter with Brown as did Lee, Hangar, and Postell. Michael Brown didn’t survive and it’s too soon to say if Officer Wilson’s use of deadly force was justified and legal. You and I both know that not all officers survive such confrontations. Officers die in incidents like this Captain Johnson, including a couple that I remember from your own organization:
On April 15, 1985 Missouri Trooper Jimmie Linegar was shot and killed by a white supremacist he and his partner stopped at a checkpoint; neither Trooper Linegar nor his partner were aware that the man they had stopped had just been indicted by a federal grand jury for involvement in a neo-Nazi group accused of murder. The suspect immediately exited the vehicle and opened fire on him with an automatic weapon.
Just a month before, Missouri Trooper James M. Froemsdorf was shot and killed—with his own gun—after making a traffic stop. When the Trooper made that stop he didn’t know that the driver was wanted on four warrants out of Texas—But again the suspect knew it.
So Captain Johnson, I guess the mindset and recently committed crimes of the suspects that murdered those Missouri Troopers didn’t mean anything. The stops by the Troopers, as you have said, are entirely different events right?
Some information contained in this article came from the Officer Down Memorial Page (ODMP).

Ferguson Witness: Government is Planting Provocateurs in Neighborhoods

Outrage In Missouri Town After Police Shooting Of 18-Yr-Old Man
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." 
― Vladimir Lenin  

A video has surfaced in which a man in the Saint Louis area, who has been involved in the protests in Missouri tells viewers that agent provocateurs are infiltrating legitimate protests in Missouri, all for the sake of the government growing its militarized presence in the area.   

The videographer wrote in the description of the video:
"I debated with myself over an hour about whether I should post this or not. Earlier, while on the 2nd shift of our U. City protest, a guy pulled up, called all of us over, and said he worked with the government. He asked if we had a cell phone or something we could record him with. He said he was on his way out of here and wanted this recorded. I shid you not, and between my research on this government, & history, I'm inclined to believe him. Watch, like, share, tag, flood the news fb pages, WE ARE ALMOST OUT OF TIME!!!"

*Warning – Graphic Language*  

We have had numerous reports that there are infiltrators in many of these protests and we have seen the police stand down against actual lawbreakers while at the same time throwing flashbang grenades, firing tear gas and rubber bullets at peaceful protesters. And what makes me sick about this is that "conservatives" cheer this on. I'm not one that will back lawbreakers, but honestly people, since when is simply protesting a bad thing?
I couldn't make out that guy's name on the video because it was so mumbled. However, he began by stating that the protests were a "beautiful thing." However, he quickly spoke out infiltrators among the people that were "plants."
"What they doing is bringing these national guards in today," he said. "By next week, we will have St. Louis locked down. I'm trying to tell ya'll that these protestors that they plant in these neighborhoods, they gonna plant them in Chesterfield… they gonna plant them in Clayton… they gonna plant them in Florissant… they gonna plant them in Hazelwood."

"They gonna have people standing outside that's paid," he continued. "They gonna walk up to bums, paying 'em hundreds of dollars to stand and hold a sign to say 'Free my people' or 'No fighting' or 'No shooting.'"   

"But that sh*t is propaganda," he said. "It's an agenda. They putting ya'll in the hood. And in three days, it's gonna be a big-ass group of people around here, and next thing you know, there's gonna be some troops at the end of that light and some troops at the end of that light. They tryin' to do this so they can get in these cribs."   

I confess that after watching the video, he was reminiscent of what I told Bradlee Dean on his Sons of Liberty Radio show yesterday. This is all about stirring up a rebellion, so that the government can come in and be the savior and drop the hammer on these people.
But there was more to be said. The guy in the video said that he believes this is being done so that the government can get into people's houses.
"Obama signed martial law in 2012," he said. "The sh*t is gonna go down. There is no peace from here."
He concluded by saying, "Get your family, get your loved ones and love them. This is the heart of America. They chose this state for a reason."

"They plant people in our neighborhoods who look just like us. Niggas wearing Jays and saying 'Go out there and protest' and then they gonna have a nigga shoot in the air and then they gonna have assault rifles shooting at everybody on the block. That's how they do it and that's how the news gonna present it… the agenda is to shut St. Louis down. We the heart of America."
As I told Dean yesterday, I do believe that this entire event is being orchestrated by the federal government, not local government. We have seen how DHS has provided provocateurs and the New Black Panthers, who are very tight with Barack Obama and Eric Holder, have also been in Ferguson to incite more violence.

Probably the best thing the people in the area can do at this point is arm themselves and simply stay inside. By doing so, they take away any advantage to use and manipulate them from their would be oppressors. Furthermore, if they protests continue, the people should be wise enough to root out infiltrators. Anyone that is not known to the crowd, should be immediately suspect and ostracized from their protests.
While the Michael Brown shooting may have been the start of this issue, that is not the story here. The story is how the militarized police of the area are allowing the lawlessness of rioting and looting, while at the same time making criminals of peaceful protestors. Just watch the video below.

Russian Government Gets Sick Of Muslim Violence, Has Police Officers Search Veiled Women And Islamic Schools


Russia, being fed up with Muslim violence, will be passing a law, by 2015, that will prohibit certain Islamic literature deemed as extremist and dangerous to society. As of now, Russian police are already searching Muslim schools (madrasas) and stopping veiled Muslim women to interrogate them in Crimea.   

It is the Russian Inquisition, and I can already hear the empty leftist and modern-minded Christians complaining about it. Eider Ismailov, the assistant mufti of Crimea, said:
This shows that Russian police do not trust headscarfed women, and see them as a separate group in the general public … This is nothing but an insult against our beliefs as Muslims
One report informs us:
Recently, Muslim women in the capital Simferopol and Bakhchysarai have accused Russian police of pulling women with Islamic hijab over for passport checks.

Women added that they were being treated as if they were 'enemies' on their Facebook profiles.

Security check did not target women only.

Over the past few days, Crimea religious schools, or madrassahs, have been searched for banned Islamic literature.
Three madrasas were searched during August 13, ahead of the law that will come into force in 2015 that bans a number of popular Islamic books, another assistant mufti, Esadullah Bairov, said.

"The books are removed as a warning, as the law is not in force in Crimea yet. Still, no extremist literature was found in Crimean madrasas that were searched," Bairov said. 

Russia needs to continue and pursue such laws. Thank God for the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian government, working together to fight and suppress this evil. Let the Two Swords of St. Peter, that is, the Church and the State, be unleashed on the forces and principalities of darkness that so wish to destroy Christianity.
This is part of militancy: having the state to obliterate the works of Satan.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Rick Perry Should Wear Indictment Charge as a Badge of Honor


There’s one thing you can say about Democrats – they never quit. They will use every tactic – moral or immoral, right or wrong, justified or not – to win.
When they couldn’t beat Gov. Scott Walker in an election, they attacked him in the streets and the capital building. When that didn’t work, they tried to defeat him in the courts:

“Prosecutors believe Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a potential 2016 Republican candidate for president, was at the center of a nationwide ‘criminal scheme’ to illegally coordinate fundraising with outside conservative groups, according to previously secret court documents. . . .”
The attack on Walker was to sully his reputation even though the governor did nothing wrong. Two judges reviewed the charges and dropped the case against him.

“‘The facts are pretty clear. You’ve had not one, but two judges – a state judge and a federal judge … have both looked at this argument in the past, not just recently, remember this is not new news it’s just newly released yesterday,’ Walker explained.”
Liberals did a similar thing to Tom DeLay.
They are doing the same to Gov. Rick Perry. They see him as a threat to their steam rolling of American politics so he has to be taken out.
Rick Perry Mugshot cropped
[Gov. Rick Perry 'Mug Shot']
Even liberals consider what the Austin liberals are doing to be a big mistake. 

Perry’s doing the right thing. He’s going to use the indictment as a way to draw attention to the failed policies of the Democrats. That may be one of the reasons so many Democrats are stepping away from the indictment charge. They believe it’s going to harm the Democrats. 

Here are some of Perry’s comments:
“I’m here today because I did the right thing. I’m going to enter this courthouse with my head held high, and not only were the actions that I took not only lawful and legal, but right. And if I had to do so, I would veto funding for the integrity unit again. You think any governor, Democrat or Republican, would expect this important unit with jurisdiction over state officials, be led by someone who lives up to the high standard of conduct and personal integrity. 

“And this issue is far bigger than me. It is about the rule of law, about the constitution that allows not just a governor but every citizen to speak their mind free of political interference or legal intimidation.
“This indictment is nothing but an attack on the constitutional powers of the governor. There are important fundamental issues at stake, and I will not allow this attack on our system of government to stand. I’m going to fight this injustice with every fiber of my being, and we will prevail. And we’ll prevail because we’re standing for the rule of law.” 

Perry's indictment is really about Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg's DWI arrest last year. Lehmberg is known for pursuing corruption charges against former U.S. House Majority Leader DeLay and other Republicans.
Perry wanted her removed because of her unethical behavior. A Republican would have been forced to resign on the spot. Here's her extended drunken mug shot for all the world to see: