Shakil Afridi has languished in jail for years — since 2011, when the
Pakistani doctor used a vaccination scam in an attempt to identify
Osama bin Laden’s home, aiding U.S. Navy Seals who tracked and killed
the al-Qaida leader.
Americans might wonder how Pakistan could imprison a man who helped
track down the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. Pakistanis are apt to ask
a different question: how could the United States betray its trust and
cheapen its sovereignty with a secret nighttime raid that shamed the
military and its intelligence agencies?
“The Shakil Afridi saga is the perfect metaphor for U.S-Pakistan
relations” — a growing tangle of mistrust and miscommunication that
threatens to jeopardize key efforts against terrorism, said Michael
Kugelman, Asia program deputy director at the Woodrow Wilson Center in
Washington.
The U.S. believes its financial support entitles it to Pakistan’s
backing in its efforts to defeat the Taliban — as a candidate, Donald
Trump pledged to free Afridi, telling Fox News in April 2016 he would
get him out of prison in “two minutes. … Because we give a lot of aid to
Pakistan.” But Pakistan is resentful of what it sees as U.S.
interference in its affairs.
Mohammed Amir Rana, director of the independent Pakistan Institute of
Peace Studies in Islamabad, said the trust deficit between the two
countries is an old story that won’t be rewritten until Pakistan and the
U.S. revise their expectations of each other, recognize their divergent
security concerns and plot an Afghan war strategy, other than the
current one which is to both kill and talk to the Taliban.
“Shakil Afridi (is) part of the larger puzzle,” he said.
Afridi hasn’t seen his lawyer since 2012 and his wife and children
are his only visitors. For two years his file “disappeared,” delaying a
court appeal that still hasn’t proceeded. The courts now say a
prosecutor is unavailable, his lawyer,Qamar Nadeem Afridi, told The Associated Press.
“Everyone is afraid to even talk about him, to mention his name,” and
not without reason, said Nadeem, who is also Afridi’s cousin.
In Nadeem’s office, the wind whistles through a clumsily covered
window shattered by a bullet. On another window, clear tape covers a
second bullet hole, both from a shooting incident several years ago in
which no suspects have been named. Another of Afridi’s lawyers was
gunned down outside his Peshawar home and a Peshawar jail deputy
superintendent, who had advocated on Afridi’s behalf, was shot and
killed, said Nadeem.
Afridi used a fake hepatitis vaccination program to try to get DNA
samples from bin Laden’s family as a means of pinpointing his location.
But he has not been charged in connection with the bin Laden operation.
He was accused under tribal law alleging he aided and facilitated
militants in the nearby Khyber tribal region, said Nadeem. Even the
Taliban scoffed at the charge that was filed to make use of Pakistan’s
antiquated tribal system, which allows closed courts, does not require
the defendant to be present in court, and limits the number of appeals,
he said.
If charged with treason — which Pakistani authorities say he
committed — Afridi would have the right to public hearings and numerous
appeals all the way to the Supreme Court, where the details of the bin
Laden raid could be laid bare, something neither the civilian nor
military establishments want, his lawyer said.
Tensions have grown between Pakistan and the U.S. since Trump’s New
Year’s Day tweet in which he accused Pakistan of taking $33 billion in
aid and giving only “deceit and lies” in return while harboring Afghan
insurgents who attack American soldiers in neighboring Afghanistan. Days
later, the U.S. suspended military aid to Pakistan, which could amount
to $2 billion.
Infuriated by Trump’s tweet, Pakistan accused Washington of making it a scapegoat for its failure to bring peace to Afghanistan.
The Wilson Center’s Kugelman advocated a “scaled-down relationship”
between the two countries. He said both sides need to agree to disagree
on some issues and instead focus on those areas where they can agree to
cooperate against terror groups that both regard as threats, including
the Islamic State group and al-Qaida.
Pakistan and the Taliban sanctuaries it provides are a big part of
the insurgents’ success in Afghanistan, but it’s only one of many
factors, Kugelman said.
“It’s foolish to suggest that if the Pakistani sanctuaries were
eliminated, the insurgency would magically go away and the U.S. would be
able to prevail in Afghanistan,” he said. “The Taliban has persevered
because the U.S. still struggles to fight wars against non-state actors,
and because the Afghan government has remained a weak and corrupt
entity that has failed to convince a critical mass of Afghans that it’s a
better alternative to the Taliban.”
Afridi spends his days alone, isolated from a general prison
population filled with militants who have vowed to kill him for his role
in locating bin Laden, said Nadeem. Still, Nadeem said authorities are
treating Afridi well and he is in good health, according to those who
have seen him.
There was a no indication whether U.S. Acting Assistant Secretary of
State Alice Wells brought Afridi’s case up in recent meetings in
Pakistan. But in a statement, the U.S. State Department told the AP that
Afridi has not been forgotten.
“We believe Dr. Afridi has been unjustly imprisoned and have clearly
communicated our position to Pakistan on Dr. Afridi’s case, both in
public and in private,” it said.
In the past, Pakistan has compared Afridi’s dilemma with demands for
the release of Afia Siddiqui, a Pakistani woman who is in U.S. custody
convicted of trying to kill an American soldier in Afghanistan.
“To America, she (Siddiqui) is a terrorist,” said Kugelman. “To Pakistan, she is a wrongfully imprisoned innocent.”
The Associated Press contributed to this article.
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
