Friday, April 3, 2015

Gay Group Demands Christian Churches Be SHUT DOWN for Opposing Same-Sex Marriage

<br /><b>Warning</b>:  Illegal string offset 'alt' in <b>/home/visiontoamerica/public_html/wp-content/themes/responsive-childtheme-master/v2a-responsive-email-template.php</b> on line <b>218</b><br />h

by Jason DeWitt
It has begun. LGBT “activists” have gone full fascist since the passage of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
Now — right before the holiest days in the Christian calendar — one gay group is attacking Churches who dare to believe that homosexuality is wrong.
The largest gay group in one Western state is demanding that Churches who follow the Bible be shut down by the government.
Jeran Artery, the chairman of Wyoming Equality posted that stunning statement to his Facebook page. When Christians reacted with outrage, the cowardly Artery deleted it. No apology, just hoping it would go down the memory hole. No such luck. 

The folks at Conservative Colorado got a screen shot of the post before Artery deleted it.
Today, in a stunning statement, Jeran Artery, Chairman of Wyoming Equality argued that churches who do not support same sex marriage should lose their tax exempt status.
Churches that lobby to have freedoms and rights taken away from ANYONE should absolutely have their 501(c)3 status revoked!!”
Talk about tolerance, freedom of speech, and religious freedom. Disagree with Artery’s views of same sex marriage and your church will be shut down.
Gone are the days of pluralism. This is what tyranny looks like.
501c3 gays

This should come as no surprise, as it reflects the vile militancy the LGBT movement is known for. Just as they unleashed threats of violence and arson against a tiny pizzeria in Indiana when they dared to express a very mild opinion against gay marriage, so they want to punish Christians who dare to preach, well, Christianity.
Revocation of exempt status is a financial death penalty for most churches, as an estimated 85% of them barely break even or operate at a loss, with most of their efforts geared toward helping the needy. It makes perfect sense that a far-left gay group would advocate this, as it is how Obama used IRS official Lois Lerner to silence conservative groups.
But notice who he did not mention: mosques. Gays never criticize Islam, even though it is only Muslims who are hanging gays from cranes and throwing them from buildings every sngle week. 
Get ready. With weak-knees like Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R) already backing down, you can expect the pink mafia to step up their aggressive action against Christians who dare to exercise their 1st Amendment rights.

Post Continues on

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Obama’s Social Security Number Fraud Evidence Goes to Judge Who Blocked Illegal Amnesty

Judge Andrew Hanen

oped: Oh Oh appears as if the Grim Reaper is on the horizon...Congress failed to a Judge will review:)

Judge Andrew Hanen is the Texas judge who has stood in the way of Barack Obama's illegal executive amnesty, even going so far as to threaten Obama's Justice Department with perjury, which would have provided many of his donors with cheap labor and was an obvious violation of the law. As a result of his actions, Americans have benefited from increased wages. However, the attorney that first filed an amnesty challenge before Judge Hanen has now submitted 150 pages of documented evidence concerning Obama's fraudulent Social Security number before the judge.

Attorney and medical doctor Orly Taitz, who has been involved in numerous cases involving Obama's fraudulent documentation, submitted the very first challenge to Obama's illegal executive amnesty, long before the twenty-six states, which most people have heard about in the media, filed theirs. By the time those states had issued challenges before the court, Taitz already had two injunction hearings before the Texas judge and got an order to show cause, which was issue by Judge Hanen.

Following her efforts, Taitz also filed a motion which seeks to amend her complain to include new additional facts. Among those facts are that many of the illegal aliens that are in the united States are using fraudulent identification, including stolen Social Security numbers. In fact, Taitz claims that she has been the victim of identity theft. Her Social Security number was stolen, according to an admission of by the Internal Revenue Service.
"When I sought a copy of the fraudulent tax return and request for refund filed by the thief with the IRS, I was denied my request," wrote Taitz. "I could get the identity of the thief by the bank account number which the thief attached to his request for a refund."
"The IRS is aiding and abetting criminals by refusing to provide victims with information," Taitz told Freedom Outpost.

This led to her then providing Judge Hanen with 150 pages of evidence concerning the fraudulent identity of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah. After all, if illegal aliens are doing this, and the idea is to help hold them accountable under the law, why is the chief law enforcer in the country involved in the same criminal activity.
Obama is using a stolen Social Security number, as we have documented previously. There has been absolutely no credible rebuttal of that fact.
His Social Security number is 042-68-4425 and was issued by Connecticut, though he never lived in the state. In fact, that number was actually issued to one Harry Bounel, who was born in 1890!

Taitz recently called on actor George Clooney's wife, Amal Almuddin Clooney, to investigate Obama's fraudulent identification.
Taitz told Freedom Outpost that her efforts were in large part due to the fact that many of the illegals coming across the border were not only are stealing identifications, but they are coming into the US with infectious diseases. Part of one of her motions was to deal with that issue. As a medical doctor, Taitz confirmed what Border Patrol has been telling us concerning those with infectious diseases crossing the US/Mexico border.
Now the question remains how Judge Andrew Hanen will rule once he sees all of the evidence. It appears we are not going to see any constitutional efforts to impeach Barack Obama by Congress, though that would be the rightful remedy in this matter. However, a Texas judge taking a stand against the usurper-in-chief has already drawn many Americans to his aid. I wonder if he would do the same thing regarding the crime of identity theft that the current occupant of the White House is engaged in.

Attention GOP candidates..A little less talk more action please...!

Ok GOP the party left me way back 1994 I became a conservative independent...bottom line quit begging for donations ...we have been down this road way too many times...ya begged and got both houses...and what did we the people get ? Squat/ ya go again begging for more...hello let's see a little action more money until we start seeing some positive results...I have had it with false me then maybe just maybe I will cut into my meager budget and help... until then KMA! Get it?  #Impeach #Obama and his entire seditionist cabinet crew for a start

Hit it :  

John Kerry and Barry Barack Obama drive Iran treaty deal Again

Yes indeed we have two old pot heads cutting deals with radical  Mullahs and Imams...just *SMH*  
All I can say is mama told me not to come...this would benefit all Liberals,Libertarians,and old Blue Dog Dems to do... #WalkAway

Limbaugh: What About Freedom to Love If ‘I Love Jesus’?

One of the rallying cries of opponents of Indiana’s religious freedom law is that people shouldn’t be discriminated against because of “who they love.”
But radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh flipped that around on his show on Wednesday.
Critics of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act say it allows people to use their religious beliefs to discriminate against gay people. Proponents say it only allows business owners to refuse to perform their services, such as at same-sex weddings, if doing so is a violation of their faith.
Limbaugh noted that gay-rights advocates argue against the law saying, “Why are you so upset just because of who people love? … It’s discriminatory to care about who people love . . . Why are you objecting to it?”

How Radical Leftists Use Psychological Twitter Tricks to Make Themselves Look Like the Majority

Liberals are good at making themselves the squeaky wheel.
Check it out:
The Obama campaign and the radical left have been using this for years to not only mislead the public, but to intimidate people.
My point is, they are not gigantic in numbers. They are not a majority of people. It’s not a majority of people ticked off at the state of Indiana, folks. It’s not the whole country outraged over what’s happening in Indiana. It’s made to look like that. And the media, of course, is part of the game, so they go right along with this. They know this whole thing is ginned up. You can tell them the truth, just like the story on global warming that I just had here: “Scientists Say New Study Is A ‘Death Blow’ To Global Warming Hysteria.” No, it’s not, because it isn’t about global warming.

The global warming proponents are not gonna be stopped by science that disproves their claims ’cause it isn’t about the science in the first place. There isn’t any science. Everything that you think is true about global warming has only been established to exist in a computer model. There isn’t one shred of data anywhere that can conclusively predict what the climate is gonna be next year, much less in the next 50. The only way that they can do that is computer models, and those are only as good as the input data. There is no scientific data. All there is is a so-called consensus of scientists. Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree. Well, science is not a consensus. 

But here’s the point. You can respond to all of this with fact after fact after fact after fact that destroys claim after claim after claim after claim, and it’s not going to stop because the agenda is not about global warming. Global warming is the vehicle, just like Obamacare was not really about health care. It’s about something much larger and much more insidious, as is all of the left-wing agenda. And because they still remain a minority, a true minority, a numerical minority because they are not the majority of people in this country, and they are not the majority of thinking, but they have captivated certain elements of pop culture media, and these tricks they play on Twitter and elsewhere to make themselves look like they are so numerous and so large that you and everybody like you ends up thinking you’ve lost your country and there’s only 10 or 20 of you left, and there’s no way to beat ‘em back.
It’s a total psychological ploy. They are not a majority. They’re nowhere near a numerical majority, and this is the only way that they can hope to have any success with their agenda is to impugn the opposition, intimidate, and defame, frighten, and paralyze the opposition. That is exactly what they’re engaged in. And that’s how they seek to win, because they can’t win in the arena of ideas. They are nowhere near enough people to win.
Continue Reading on ...

Christian Asks Thirteen Gay Bakeries To Bake Him Pro-Traditional Marriage Cake, And Is Denied Service By All Of Them

Funny when the shoe is on the other foot!
Check it out:
Say that “Bestiality Is Wrong” or “Polygamy Is Wrong” and it’s not considered hate speech, but if you have the opinion that “Gay Marriage Is Wrong” the whole world jumps up and down screaming “racism” “bigotry” and “hatred”.
This is becoming the politically-correct norm, but no matter what one argues, this is suppressing free speech.
No one targeted pro-gay bakeries, but gay activists target Christian bakeries. “Support Gay Marriage” is what one Christian bakery was sued for refusing to put that slogan on a cake for an event to support the gay agenda. Yet Christian bakeries that refuse to make pro-homosexual marriage cakes are getting sued left, right, and center. They get fined, they get death threats, and they lose their businesses. This experiment proves beyond doubt that the gay agenda is not just about their freedom to practice a sexual orientation, but the suppression of free speech. 

Continue Reading on ...

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Barack Obama : Caption this...

Being that a picture is worth 1000 words and all...let's see what ya be thinking!

And this, HT Shifra.

Obama Does the Impossible – Unites Israel and Neighboring Allies Against US Policy

King Obama is systematically taking control of every aspect of our ...
[King Obama has F'd up the world...however the Gay Mafia/LGBT worships his accomplishments!]
Onan Coca 
On MSNBC with Thomas Roberts NBC Foreign News correspondent Richard Engel continued his dogged war on Obama’s horrible foreign policy.
Amazingly, President Obama has finally done the impossible. Perhaps this is the foreign policy achievement upon which he can hang his hat? Obama has united Israel and her Arab neighbors in their opposition to US foreign policy in regards to Iran! That’s all it took. President Obama crafting a foreign policy that was so incredibly terrible that both sides of the Israel – Arab conflict stopped yelling at each other to stare incredulously at Obama.
I mean seriously. Everyone not in the Obama White House thinks that Obama’s foreign policy plans are completely nuts. Even the French are freaking out because Obama is forcing them to look like the tough guys!

Here’s what Engel had to say on MSNBC:
Israel, however, and several countries across the Middle East are watching this very closely, the Israeli government, the new Prime Minister, Netanyahu, do not believe that what is going on in Switzerland is the right thing.  

They think it is dangerous. They think it rewards Iran, and what we’re seeing now is an unusual dynamic where Israel, which has long been the pariah of the Middle East, is finding common cause with Arab states With Egypt, with Saudi Arabia, with Jordan, all coming down with a very similar line to Israel’s, that Iran should not be given the reward of a negotiation, that it shouldn’t be allowed to continue to have a nuclear program, even with constraints because the belief is, by both Arabs and Israelis that it will encourage Iran to, not only go forward with its nuclear program in a limited capacity, but also to continue its efforts to expand its influence around the region.

And what we see — what we’ve seen in the last several months is Iran very much spreading its influence, in Yemen through Iranian-backed rebels, in Iraq through Iranian-backed militia groups. And so there’s an interesting dynamic here. I can’t remember the last time I was in Tel Aviv and reporting about how Tel Aviv and so many Arab states like Saudi Arabia were singing from the same sheet about Iran and their opposition to US policy.


Why “Love Thy Neighbor” Is Not a Support for Same-Sex Marriage

[According to the Bible Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve...or Eve and Anna...Just a fact Jack!} 
Adam and Steve

I was listening to “The Herman Cain Show” yesterday morning when a caller wanted to know how Christians, who are told to “love your neighbor as yourself” (Matt. 22:39; Mark 12:31; Gal. 5:14), can stand against same-sex marriage. Herman Cain did not give a very good answer. 
I’m always amazed when liberals quote some parts of the Bible for their authority and don’t quote others.
The Bible is only fashionable for liberals when they can squeeze out some support, and once they extract what they need, it’s put back in its “Break Glass When Needed” compartment.

Chris Cuomo, from the pro-abortion Cuomo family, “browbeat the Family Research Council’s Peter Sprigg by, among other things, pretending to speak for Jesus, ‘Jesus message to you was “Love until it hurts and keep loving.” That’s not what [this Indiana religious law] is. It’s exclusion.’”
I don’t recall a verse where Jesus said what Cuomo manufactured, but it is loosely based on the Bible verses referenced above.
I’ll get back to the command to “love your neighbor as yourself” in a moment.
If I had been Herman Cain, I would have asked the caller if loving one’s neighbor means approving everything your neighbor does. What if your neighbor was beating his wife and children? What if another neighbor was stealing? Does loving one’s neighbor mean that these sins and crimes should be overlooked?

When someone quotes the Bible about loving your neighbor, that command does not stand alone. It’s in the broader context of the entire Bible. Consider this passage from Hebrews 12: 

“You have not yet resisted to the point of shedding blood in your striving against sin; and you have forgotten the exhortation which is addressed to you as sons, ‘MY SON, DO NOT REGARD LIGHTLY THE DISCIPLINE OF THE Lord, NOR FAINT WHEN YOU ARE REPROVED BY HIM; FOR THOSE WHOM THE Lord LOVES HE DISCIPLINES, AND HE SCOURGES EVERY SON WHOM HE RECEIVES.’ It is for discipline that you endure; God deals with you as with sons; for what son is there whom his father does not discipline? But if you are without discipline, of which all have become partakers, then you are illegitimate children and not sons. Furthermore, we had earthly fathers to discipline us, and we respected them; shall we not much rather be subject to the Father of spirits, and live? For they disciplined us for a short time as seemed best to them, but He disciplines us for our good, so that we may share His holiness. All discipline for the moment seems not to be joyful, but sorrowful; yet to those who have been trained by it, afterwards it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness” (vv. 6-11). 

Loving your neighbor does not mean ignoring what your neighbor is doing. In fact, according to the above passage, discipline is a sign of love: “FOR THOSE WHOM THE Lord LOVES HE DISCIPLINES, AND HE SCOURGES EVERY SON WHOM HE RECEIVES.”
The reason some of the above verses are in upper case letters is that they are based on Old Testament passages. The same is true of “Love your neighbor as yourself.” It comes from Leviticus 19:18. Most people don’t know this. They assume that “love your neighbor as yourself” originated with Jesus.
What’s interesting about the “love your neighbor” passage is that it’s found between Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, two chapters that address the subject of same-sex sexuality: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.” 

So if Chris Cuomo is going to take what Leviticus 19:18 says, then he needs to take the anti-same-sex-sexuality passages that are found in the same book as well. And once you start quoting Jesus, it’s necessary to see what He says about the candidates for marriage:
“And [Jesus] answered and said, ‘Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE [Gen. 1:27; 5:2], and said, “FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH” [Gen. 2:24; Eph. 5:31]? So they are no longer two, but one flesh [1 Cor. 6:16]. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.’" (Matt. 19:4-6).
"Wife" corresponds to "female," not another man.
If Chris Cuomo is going to use Jesus as a reference, it would be helpful if he knew what Jesus actually said.

Why Aren’t Muslim Business Owners Targeted by Gays?

King Obama
[King Obama leading his LGBT flock to slaughter]


Homosexuality in any form is not only a sin to Christians, but also to Jews and Muslims. In some Muslim nations, gays are imprisoned, tortured and executed. Homosexuality is less tolerated by Muslims than by Christians and Jews, so why aren’t gays targeting Muslim businesses? 

All we hear about is one Christian business owner after another being sued by homosexuals because they were exercising their First Amendment rights of freedom of religion by denying to be part of a same-sex ceremony. In reality, many of these lawsuits are a form of religious discrimination AGAINST Christians since there are other businesses in the area that will cater to homosexual requests. 

I’ve seen Christians forced to close their businesses and lose their livelihood over the discrimination waged against them by agenda driven gays. Such is the case with Barronelle Stutzman of Richland, Washington, the owner of florist shop. Her case was just tried in court and there was a chance that she would lose her business, and possibly all of her life savings and even her house.
The two gay men, who were long time customers and supposed friends don’t care about Stutzman’s religious rights or her wellbeing. Their lawsuit could have left the 70 year old grandmother penniless and homeless. She argued in front of the judge that a guilty decision would be financially devastating to her. Even though she was found guilty, the judge had some mercy on her by giving her 60 days to pay a $1,000 fine plus $1 in court fees.

But when have you heard about gays targeting businesses run by Muslims? In places like Dearborn, Michigan and Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Muslims have virtually taken over the area and now control local government, schools and many businesses. Aren’t there any gays with the guts to walk into a Muslim owned florist shop and place an order for their same-sex ceremony? 

Are gays afraid of Muslims because they are far less tolerant than Christians and may retaliate against them? Or are they purposely targeting Christians since America was once a Christian nation and many of our laws, traditions and morals are based upon Christian teaching? If that’s the case, what will homosexuals do once Obama has completed his conversion of America to Islam? Will these same gays hold to their sinful and perverse agenda and start targeting Muslims?
Somehow I think not. Muslims don’t roll over and surrender like Christians have been doing over the past 50 years. Muslims fight for their way of life and if they do gain control of America, homosexuals, transgender and otherwise sexually confused people had better make plans to leave the country because Muslims in control will discriminate against them more severely than Christians are accused of.
Thus we have the story of the cowardly hypocrisy of gay rights advocates who attack Christians but avoid attacking Muslims for treating them the same.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Apple CEO Tim Cook Is a Bigot Who Does Not Believe in Religious Freedom

<br /> <b>Warning</b>:  Illegal string offset 'alt' in <b>/home/godfatherpolitic/public_html/wp-content/themes/godfatherpolitics/gp-responsive-email-template.php</b> on line <b>217</b><br /> h

Tim Cook is the CEO of Apple. He has sex with men. I’m not revealing anything about him that he has not revealed about himself. Here’s what he said: 

“While I have never denied my sexuality, I haven’t publicly acknowledged it either, until now. So let me be clear: I’m proud to be gay, and I consider being gay among the greatest gifts God has given me.”
“Proud to be gay”? What does that mean?
Cook’s statement reveals something about how the same-sex sexuality movement defines itself. Cook states that he never denied his “sexuality.” A pedophile and an adulterer could say the same thing. There are millions of people who argue that that they are “proud” of their behavior.

By the way, homosexuals get very upset when pedophilia is used as an example of another form of “sexual preference.” Consider the following:
"‘Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,’ said the presentation. ‘At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.’
“The statement that paedophilia is ‘natural and normal’ was made not three decades ago but last July [2013]. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge. 
“Other presentations included ‘Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,’ and ‘Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.’
“Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds.”
Could the day come when discriminating against pedophile behavior and pedophile marriages will bring about leftist outrage? Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Barbara Boxer, Harry Reid, and 93 other senators signed the national Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in 1993. That was only 22 years ago. A lot could change in another 22 years. Pedophilia could be mainstreamed.
I and millions of other people believe same-sex sexuality is immoral, anti-science, and irrational. The Bible states that it is “unnatural” (Rom. 1:26-27) in terms of biology and thereby irrational.

Those who reject the Bible have nothing from which to argue in order to make their case for anything. In fact, in evolutionary terms, same-sex sexuality is contrary to evolution. Tim’s Cook’s DNA will stop with him. If he attempts to find a surrogate, he will only be admitting that same-sex sexuality is “unnatural.”
Religious freedom laws protect everybody. They are not about discriminating against anybody. The word “homosexual” does not appear anywhere in any of the religious freedom laws, and that includes Indiana’s law which is very similar to the national law that was signed by Bill Clinton in 1993 with almost unanimous consent from Congress (only three no votes).

It’s not surprising that Tim Cook “does not quote a single word from any of the religious freedom laws he denounces” which are an extension of the First Amendment, you know, that pesky right from the Constitution that has served our nation well for more than 230 years.
To do so will lead to a lot of explaining. Better to throw the elephant.
Why were these new state laws necessary? Because of people like Tim Cook who wants to cut down the Liberty Tree of clear thinking and impose his will on the vast majority of Americans by force of law. Cook is a bigot and hypocrite who wants to force people to believe like he does and at the same time call for a boycott of those who don't.

liberty tree
This is done by forcing people to accept certain behaviors they believe are contrary to their worldview. Everybody should have this freedom. Cook and others are calling for a boycott of Indiana saying they refuse to do business with the state. They are free to do so, but if a baker wants to boycott a same-sex wedding, it’s a criminal offense.
The irony is thick with these people.
These religious freedom laws were written for people like Barronelle Stutzman, owner of Arlene's Flowers, “who declined to provide flowers for a same-sex wedding because of her Christian belief in traditional marriage.” She “has been fined $1,001 by a Washington court and will be held liable to pay the legal fees incurred by the gay couple, which could ‘devastate’ her financially. . . . Stutzman is still at risk of losing her retirement savings and business as she will be responsible for paying the legal fees and damages incurred by Ingersoll and Freed, who were represented by the ACLU.”

Her “crime”? Not agreeing that same-sex marriage is legitimate marriage. So who’s the bigot? It’s multi-billionaire Tim Cook who will not allow people like Barronelle Stutzman to believe in a way different from him.
UPDATE from the Gateway Pundit: "Cook may believe Indiana’s new law is very dangerous towards gays… But it’s not as dangerous as the several countries Apple does business with where they execute gays."
Four of the ten countries where they kill homosexuals Apple does business with:
  1. Uganda
  2. Nigeria
  3. Qatar
  4. Saudi Arabia

Gay Bakery May Have to Close

Funny Friday – May 2, 2014

Food for thought...exercise in futility coming from the gay mafia! 

The year is 2015. It's late August in Indianapolis, Indiana. There's a buzz in the air about the Colts who are undefeated thus far in preseason. 

Judging by the mainstream press, this is not the only exciting thing emerging from the state. The press is still reporting on the nationwide sigh of relief, as just a few weeks ago Governor Mike Pence came to his senses, and facing extreme pressure, used a state executive action to rescind the narrow minded, and bigoted Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

On that day a reporter visited a lovely homosexual couple, Fred and Ethel (his name was Eddie - he changed it to Ethel. The reporter didn't ask why), owners of a local bakery in Indianapolis who were thrilled by the news. Evidently, ever since they heard the news they have been giving away rainbow frosted cupcakes to patrons in celebration.
During the interview, Ethel said that despite being homosexual they were also Christians and said they believe God loves them as much as He loves heterosexuals (which, by the way, He does).
Fred added that despite their Christian beliefs, they didn't care for Indiana's RFRA and were glad Gov. Pence came to his senses. They heard from many sources in the media that the Indiana law was just one more obstacle to equality.

Now weeks since the ruling, the intrepid reporter decided to pop back to Fred and Ethel's Bakery to see how they were getting on. Much to his surprise, he found the couple in a rather dour mood. Upon investigation, the reporter found that members of the Westboro Baptist Church had just days ago descended on the couple's bakery demanding that Fred and Ethel design and craft a mock wedding cake with two men perched atop it and the words "All Fags Can Go to Hell."
When asked why they couldn't just refuse, Fred exclaimed, "We are a for-profit business and the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act doesn't apply to us. Yes, we are homosexual, but we are Christians and our belief that God loves us all is directly at odds with what the swine at the Westboro Baptist Church want. They said they would sue us and force us to close our shop if we don't comply."

As the couple was lamenting to the reporter, a woman walking by overheard the conversation. She walked up to the couple and said, "Excuse me, but I couldn't help overhearing your dilemma. I was wondering if you two were glad that our governor did what he did in striking down Indiana's religious freedom law."
Ethel replied, "Yes, yes, we are glad. We don't need any more obstacles in our path for equality. As homosexuals, we understood the state law to be much more exclusive than the federal."
To that the woman said, "May I read you something?"
"Sure," replied Fred.

The woman then read the provision of the Indiana law that differed from the federal and was said to be such an obstacle.
“A person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened, by a violation of this chapter may assert the violation or impending violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding, regardless of whether the state or any other governmental entity is a party to the proceeding.” 
Ethel said, "Well, what does that mean?"

The woman answered, "In other words, the Indiana law explicitly allows any for-profit business to assert a right to the free exercise of religion. The federal RFRA doesn't contain that language."
Astonished, Fred exclaimed, "What are you telling me -- that if Mike Pence would have stood his ground and not knuckled under the pressure, we as Christian business owners would not be in the trouble we're in? We could have simply refused those bast*rds’ request?!"
"Yep -- that's what I'm telling you," the woman replied. She added, "Be careful what you wish for and who you listen to," and walked away.

Judge Bans Constitution

This judge needs to be removed and banned from public service... definite violation of her oath of office! Check it out:
A judge in Xenia, Ohio said “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” during a trial of a journalist who is charged with a misdemeanor after he was cited for protesting against an anti-panhandling ordinance.
Judge Kathryn Barber laughed when the defendant, Virgil Vaduva, argued his protest on a public sidewalk outside the Xenia police station constitutes free speech.
The exchange between Barber and Vaduva occurred after a prosecutor said mentioning the Constitution during the trial would “confuse the jury.” 

Widespread Ignorance of Constitution
Many Americans are surprisingly ignorant of the Constitution and the founding principles of the United States.
An informal ABC News poll conducted in 2011 revealed that 70 percent of 1,000 people surveyed could not identify the supreme law of the land (the Constitution).
“Sixty-one percent didn’t know that the length of a U.S. senator’s term is six years, 63 percent couldn’t name the number of Supreme Court justices on the bench (nine), and 86 percent didn’t know that 435 members fill the U.S. House of Representatives,” ABC News reported. 

Continue Reading on ...

Monday, March 30, 2015

BillOreilly's : "The Killing of Jesus"

Well I watched the Killing of Jesus on the NatGeo channel ...The Passion it was not...The Passion of Christ was a definite A-flick right up there with Moses,Spartacus,The Robe... while the Killing of Jesus was a good documentary it was  not a great one...had it been released as a movie it would have been a weak B-flick.
I have to give it a C on the documentary side as it was not any different then the many many documentaries on the life of Jesus released over the followed the same time and story lines as all the others...nothing new, inspiring ,shocking or chair grabbing!

I also found it a tad bit on the patronizing /PC side when Bill O'reilly, prior to the airing, and during the teaser stage stressed the main Character playing Jesus was a Muslim why did he find it necessary to stress that? To increase the viewing audience? Probably and a little patronizing to Islam and  the Muslim religion !
I found the character playing Jesus to be a good actor but not a great one and not all that convincing however he did look the part as Jesus would have looked during this era minus the long locks...during Jesus time Jewish men sported shorter hair than depicted!

Anywoo...thats my review of the documentary The Killing of Jesus...and I'm sticking to it!
You be the judge:

Bill O' Reilly, author of Killing Lincoln and Killing Kennedy, declared that Jesus merely started "a philosophy" and much of the biblical narratives are allegorical and symbolic—not real history. He also suggested that Christians do not worship Jesus Christ but worship the "spirit of Jesus." He's convinced that Christ's main undertaking was to teach men how to live.

Jewish Rabbi Compares President Obama to Evil Haman who Tried to Kill all the Jews

The evil Haman was prime minister of the Persian Empire, but Mordecai ...
[The evil Haman was prime minister of the Persian Empire from the book of Esther] 
Haman Cartoon

For American Christians the story of Queen Esther and Mordecai in the Old Testament is one that reminds us that the entire history of the Jewish people has been filled with persecution and attempts at genocide. Haman was a vizier in the Persian (Iran) Empire under Xerxes I, and Haman desperately hated the Jewish people.
The story has played itself out in similar fashion several times throughout history, and while things may look bleak for a time, the Jewish people have always persevered and survived. However, some are worried that the Jewish people may have met their match in President Barack Obama.
The chief Rabbi of Efrat in Israel, Rabbi Shlomo Rifkin, recently connected President Obama to the great villain Haman. Speaking at the Jerusalem Great Synagogue Rabbi Rifkin said,
“The president of the United States is lashing out at Israel just like Haman lashed out at the Jews. I’m not making a political statement. I’m making a Jewish statement.” 

A woman in crowd rose to protest saying that the Rabbi was being disrespectful, but the crowd booed loudly in his defense. The Rabbi called for silence and told those gathered that they did not need to defend him.
“I am being disrespectful because the president of the United States was disrespectful to my prime minister, to my country, to my future and to the future of the world.” 

Haman -- The Great Enemy of the Jews

The Rabbi then went on to compare Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, favorably to Mordecai, who, along with Queen Esther, did everything he could to save the Jewish people from the evil Haman. President Obama conversely was compared to Haman for his efforts to endanger the people of Israel by strengthening their enemies and working against the state of Israel.
While President Obama battles ISIS and negotiates with Iran, he misses the key fact of the matter. In truth, there is no difference between Iran and ISIS other then the manner in which they choose to work to destroy Israel.

The Rabbi is right, and it should be to our shame that it is an American President who has done more to weaken the state of Israel than anything Israel’s true enemies could have even hoped to accomplish. President Obama is a danger to Israel, a danger to America, and a danger to the free world. The day he leaves office will be a great day for freedom and a great day for our world.

34,000 Black, Latino Churches Stand Against 'Gay' Marriage

... -Christians of the Presbyterian Church (USA) Partner With the Devil

In a walloping rebuke to the forces pushing for acceptance of homosexual "marriage," a coalition of more than 34,000 predominantly black and Latino churches has severed ties with the Presbyterian Church USA.
After a June vote endorsing homosexual marriage, the PCUSA recently officially changed its church constitution's definition of marriage to "commitment between two people," rather than between a man and a woman.
That move made it the largest Protestant denomination to pretend that homosexual marriage is a Christian institution.

The National Black Church Initiative has rightly called the Presbyterians on their departure from the Bible.
The Rev. Anthony Evans, president of the NBCI, wrote that the "arbitrary change of Holy Scripture is a flagrantly pretentious and illegitimate maneuver by a body that has no authority whatsoever to alter holy text."
NBCI includes 15 Christian denominations and over 15.7 million black and Latino members.
Evans added, in his statement published at Charisma News, "NBCI and its membership base are simply standing on the Word of God within the mind of Christ. We urge our brothers and sisters of the PCUSA to repent and be restored to fellowship."
As the saying goes, in an age of lies, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. Evans and his group can, I think, consider themselves official rebels at this point.

They're certainly putting their heads on the liberal chopping blocks, because they're not only telling the truth that the Left doesn't want to hear, but it's a specifically religious truth.
And religion is at the heart of the homosexual rights movement, particularly "gay" marriage activism.
The Left may talk about "equality" for homosexual couplings, but there really is "no there there" in that argument because homosexuals choose to be what they are, and for the most part nobody cares, unless some homosexual starts waving his lifestyle in people's faces, trying to convert schoolkids, demanding special privileges and otherwise upsetting people who don't endorse his choices.

On the contrary, it has become increasingly obvious over the years that the real motivation behind the homosexual marriage movement is to tear down biblically based religion, as several Christian bakers can now attest.
Acquiescing to political pressure to change church doctrine in order to support a fad will ultimately destroy the meaning of the Christian church.
Evans wrote, "No church has the right to change the Word of God. By voting to redefine marriage PCUSA automatically forfeits Christ’s saving grace. There is always redemption in the body of Christ through confession of faith and adhering to Holy Scripture."
If the Presbyterian Church someday sees the light and repents, it can come back. But until that day comes, it's just on a highway to hell and teaching others to follow down that road.
And that is the truth.

Gays Say Jewish Business Must Print “Death to Israel” Signs

Black Baker and KKK

The title to this article is the logical extension of protests against Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. If a baker is discriminating by refusing to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding, then a printer is discriminating for not printing a "Death to Israel" sign.
Homosexuals and their ignorant supporters are upset that Indiana has passed a freedom of religion law. I’m confused. I thought the First Amendment guaranteed that the government could not “prohibit the free exercise” of religion. That’s what it says. It does not add “unless a group that practices same-sex sex objects.”

The right is very comprehensive, that’s why I can’t understand why we ever needed a national Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). But we got one, and because the Supreme Court ruled that it did not apply to the states, states began to enact their own version of the 1993 law signed by then President Bill Clinton.
“A federal RFRA signed by President Clinton in 1993 shares language with Indiana and other states' bills, prohibiting the government from ‘substantially burdening’ individuals' exercise of religion unless it is for a ‘compelling government interest’ and is doing so in the least restrictive means.”
Sixteen additional states have introduced similar “legislation this year regarding the creation of, or alteration to, a state religious freedom law. Currently, 19 states have Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs).”

When Barack Obama was an Illinois state senator, he voted “for a version of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. It passed the Illinois Senate 56-0 and became law on July 1, 1998.” So why all the same-sex angst over Indiana’s law?
The homosexual movement is similar to the Taliban. Any infraction or any attempt to soften their version of the law will result in forceful retaliation. It’s no wonder that words like “Gaystapo” and “Gay Mafia” are often used to describe what is taking place around the country today. “Don’t go against the gaysters.”
Bakers, florists, and photographers have learned the hard way not to go against the Gay Mafia. They didn’t refuse to serve homosexuals. They only refused to service events that went against their religious beliefs as any rational person would expect them to.
Personally, I think everybody should have the freedom not to serve events they oppose. Why is this even a debatable subject?
Should a black business owner be forced to service a white supremacy group or the KKK? Of course not.

If the homosexuals and their brain-dead supporters get their way, it would not be illogical to argue that a Jewish business must print “Death to Israel” signs and t-shirts.
At the moment, homosexuals who are opposing the Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act and those in 19 other states would say that this is a ridiculous analogy. No one would ever do such a thing. Of course, that’s not the point.
Why should one group be permitted to apply his religious liberty and deny service to an ideology or event and not another?

Everybody is protected by a state’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. If a homosexual bakery is asked to make a cake for an anti-same-sex marriage conference, it should not have to make it.
If a pro-abortionist who owns a bakery is asked to make a cake for an anti-abortion event, the pro-abortionist should not be forced to make it. Such a law protects everybody equally, something homosexuals do not want.
A Muslim printer would not have to print t-shirts that read “Muhammad Was a False Prophet.”
Lawrence Meyer’s comments in Townhall are spot on:
“It is the Leftists that are bigots. To them, it doesn’t matter if the rights of other people that get trampled on in the process. It only matters when the rights of people Leftists care about get trampled on.
“The Left is so very strident against discrimination – oh, but only gays, blacks, Hispanics, illegal immigrants, and Radical Islamists need apply for the victocracy. 

“Yet they don’t care about discriminating against Christians, and will do anything they can to align themselves against the Jews and Israel, because Leftist philosophy is anti-freedom, anti-religion, and ultimately anti-human.”

Sunday, March 29, 2015

CA Democrat: Climate Change Will Force Women Into Prostitution

For the third time, California Democrat Barbara Lee has introduced legislation to the House of Representatives insisting that women will be forced into “transactional sex” if something is not done to protect them from the effects of climate change.
In a bill she first proposed in 2009, and then again in 2013, Lee claims that “women will disproportionately face harmful impacts from climate change. Food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and poor reproductive health.”

Her bill – House Concurrent Resolution 29 – urges Congress to use “gender-sensitive frameworks in developing policies to address climate change.”
Of course, Lee’s predictions are just the latest in an unending series of warmist worst-case-scenarios that never seem to materialize. While liberals in the media pound their desks in frustration whenever they are confronted with “deniers,” they seem unwilling to explain why so many of their predictions have failed. We’ve been observing the “settled” climate science long enough to have ample evidence that – more often than not – the warmist crowd is wrong when they make concrete predictions about how global warming is going to destroy the world. Yet we’re expected to greet each new dire warning with unthinking acceptance. Oh, women will be forced into prostitution because of climate change. Yes, yes, that’s definitely true, mmm-hmm. Tell me more, Rep. Lee!

Certainly, there’s no chance that her grim prediction will turn out like the 2005 warnings issued by the United Nations Environment Programme. In their report, the UNEP warned that by 2010, we could expect to see 50 million climate refugees forced to flee their homes in coastal areas, the Caribbean, and the low-lying Pacific Islands. Faced with destructive hurricanes, desertification, and rising sea-levels, these areas would turn into the first ghost-town victims of climate change.
As it turned out, though, most of the places designated by the report have actually increased their populations in the years since. The Bahamas, St. Lucia, the Seychelles, China, and U.S. cities specifically named by the report have all experienced population growth in the intervening years. There have been no climate refugees at all, much less the projected 50 million. But let’s just sweep that prediction under the rug.
What about the Pentagon’s 2003 prediction that climate change was an imminent threat to U.S. national security? In their report, it was envisioned that the world would be a global disaster zone within a decade. There would be very little polar ice left in the summers, natural disasters like hurricanes and tornadoes would increase in both frequency and devastation, California would be flooded with inland seas, and many areas of the Netherlands would be uninhabitable.

When confronted last year on the failed predictions, Pentagon report co-author Doug Randall acted as though it was a silly question to ask. “Whether the actual specifics came true, of course not. That was never the main intent,” he said.
Indeed. Just as the intent of Barbara Lee’s prediction that climate change will force women into prostitution is not to accurately foresee the future. It’s meant to generate fear, garner more money for environmental organizations and the federal government, and take more power out of the hands of the people. In other words, to achieve the same goals liberals always want to achieve.

"....more money for .... the federal government, and take more power out of the hands of the people...."
The People should stop granting power to the diety you call "government" !
Modern tyrants and their enforcers are always outnumbered (and often outgunned) by their victims by a factor of hundreds or thousands. Yet tyrants still maintain power, not because people lack the physical ability to resist, but because through prolonged brainwashing they adopted the belief in “authority”, and as a result lack the mental ability to resist.
As Stephen Biko put it : “The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.”