Saturday, January 23, 2016

Malheur SITREP: 2200L 23 JAN 2016 ...Burns, Oregon

Malheur SITREP: 2200L 23 JAN 2016

This is a Situation Report from sources on the ground in the vicinity of (IVO) Burns, Oregon, as well as from open source reporting. This SITREP includes information from a SALUTE report generated yesterday* and is augmented with more recent information.
– An estimated 200 federal vehicles are in the town of Burns, Oregon, located at the FBI compound at the Burns Municipal Airport, hotels, and on the roads.
– Including approximately 50 vehicles at the Harney County Sheriff’s Office, we concur with yesterday’s SALUTE report that 400 or more local, state, and federal personnel are on the ground IVO the town of Burns.
– Last week, the FBI compound at the Burns Municipal Airport consisted of one modular tent, a directional microwave antenna, a “cell on wheels” antenna, and a satellite dish mounted on a communications vehicle.
– In the past several days, the FBI presence has significantly increased to three modular tents, six equipment trailers, and one to two dozen mobile light towers, in addition to dozens of additional personnel. Sources on the ground say the increase consists mostly of tactical teams, as opposed to support teams.
– Multiple sources also report that the FBI and other law enforcement demeanor has changed to “almost hostile” towards the Pacific Patriots Network.

ANALYST COMMENT: Analysts concur that the ramp up of federal personnel and equipment is sufficient to put a cordon in place around the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, and possibly set up checkpoints IVO Burns, OR.  One thing missing from the area is the presence of armor, such as Bearcats, Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Proof (MRAP), Cougar or Buffalo military vehicles.  I would not expect a cordon to be put into place without armored vehicles in place, so that may be the best indicator of a future cordon.
Although the FBI now has the capability to cordon and raid the Refuge, we do not expect the FBI to choose violence as a first resort. From the beginning, the FBI has gone on the record and maintained that they want a peaceful resolution. I still believe this to be the case.
Open source media reports the presence of children at the Refuge.  Significant backlash would follow an attempt to clear the compound without first exhausting all negotiations to remove the children from the area.  If children perish during another government onslaught like Waco or Ruby Ridge, a large number of Americans have gone on the record to say that there will be the proverbial hell to pay.  I believe this to be the case, too.
A best case scenario is one that ends with Ammon Bundy and the Occupiers having gotten their point across to the American People without blood being shed by either party. 

SALUTE Report from 22 JAN 16:
SIZE: 200+ Fed vehicles, 400-500 agents/LEOs, mostly tac guys
ACTIVITIES: Shadowing militia throughout town. Hotels filling up with FBI, State Troopers, etc. Sheriff’s dept fully locked down and barricaded.
LOCATION: Burns airport. Most hotels. Sheriff’s department.
UNITS: FBI tac teams, State Troopers, and SDs from around state
TIME: No demands have been made by FBI to vacate facility. Bundy will not vacate until his demands are met.
EQUIPMENT: Multiple large army tents at airport. Approximately 1 dozen light towers, half dozen portable outhouses. Minimum 1 drone. Multiple comms trucks, satellite and antenna. 1 medical response van.
ADDITIONAL: State Police are pulling any vehicle over, including citizens, for absolutely any small violation. Was not case previously to this weekend.

Photo credit:  Harney County Mall Cops

Ex-Prosectuor Giuliani Comes Forward With Significant Prediction About Hillary Email Scandal

Former U.S. Attorney and New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani recently stated that he sees no way for the scandal-plagued presumptive Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to avoid being indicted and prosecuted over the “secretive and highly classified” material she held on her private email server while serving as secretary of state.
During an appearance on “Fox & Friends,” the former prosecutor declared, “(There are) 13 violations of federal law that she arguably committed. This is about as clear as it gets. It is a crime to negligently handle top secret material.”
Giuliani said that during his time in government he would often end up working late into the night/early morning in order to avoid removing top secret or sensitive materials from his office.

“Now, how can she put all this out there and not get proceeded against by the government,” said Giuliani, pointing to the successful prosecution and continued disgracing of retired Gen. David Petraeus, who had shared classified information with his biographer/mistress.
“They treated it — in the case of Petraeus — as a major crime, and his actions are a hundredth of hers,” proclaimed Giuliani. “She misrepresented about it. She’s lied about it. She said she had no top secret material. It’s absurd.”
As to the tens of thousands of emails reportedly deleted by Hillary and her team before the FBI seized her private email server, Giuliani noted that “that’s evidence of a guilty knowledge … the destruction is evidence of guilty knowledge, evidentiary principle that you can use against someone when they’re in a situation where who knows what’s on those 34,000 e-mails.”

He also dismissed the claim by Hillary that the FBI investigation was politically motivated, noting that the investigation’s second track into the Clinton Foundation should be “really worrying” to her team of lawyers.

Hopefully Rudy Giuliani is correct, as Hillary somehow avoiding an indictment and prosecution for her seemingly obvious crimes would only prove how lawless and corrupt our government has become under the Obama administration.
H/T Newsmax

Trump Wants to Repeal and Replace Obamacare With Government Universal Healthcare

<br /><b>Warning</b>: Illegal string offset 'alt' in <b>/home/visiontoamerica/public_html/wp-content/themes/responsive-childtheme-master/v2a-responsive-email-template.php</b> on line <b>217</b><br />h
This past Sunday GOP frontrunner Donald Trump appeared on CBS’ 60 Minutes for a one-on-one interview with Scott Pelley about the state of the race and to discuss Trump’s specific positions on certain issues. The most enlightening moment came when the discussion turned to healthcare and Trump had the opportunity to excoriate Obamacare (rightly).
“Obamacare’s going to be repealed and replaced. Obamacare is a disaster if you look at what’s going on with premiums where they’re up 40, 50, 55 percent,” Trump told Pelley.

However, instead of then arguing that we should repeal Obamacare and return our nation to a free market based healthcare alternative, Trump actually said that he believed Obamacare wasn’t socialist enough and that the government had to completely take over the healthcare industry!
Donald Trump: “Everybody’s got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, ‘No, no, the lower 25 percent that can’t afford private.’ But…”
Scott Pelley: “Universal Healthcare?”
Donald Trump: “I am going to take care of everybody. I don’t care if it costs me votes or not. Everybody’s going to be taken care of much better than they’re taken care of now.”
Scott Pelley: “But who’s going to pay for it?”
So take a minute and tell us what you think of Trump the Trickster by ...

Post Continues on

Jesse Watters Takes On Anti-Trump Conservatives

On “The Five” Jesse Watters spoke up to defend Trump’s conservative principles and takes on the anti-Trump “conservatives”

“Right now this country is down on its knees wounded, begging for real leadership and finally a real strong leader comes along”, said Watters. 

See the Five video here :
H/T Fox Nation 

oped: LOL yes we get it Jesse Mr 35 going on 15...ya be a funny dude and all...but I have a real hard time taking you serious! 
Oh and please try to stay up to speed on the Trump issues: 

At any rate quote the Jesse "I'm Watters and this is my world"...ha que: 

Senator Richard Burr said he would vote for Bernie Sanders over Ted Cruz

Senate Conservatives Fund
Richard Burr (R-NC)

Fellow Conservative:

We all know that the Republican establishment hates conservatives, but rarely do these Beltway elites admit it like Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) did yesterday.

According to the Associated Press, Senator Burr told folks at a private fundraiser that he would vote for Bernie Sanders (D-VT) for president before he would vote for Ted Cruz (R-TX).

Senator Burr denied the report, but the AP has a source who was in the room and is standing by its story. The source said Burr "did not appear to be joking."

And this isn't really a surprise. Last year, Burr absurdly instructed his staff to investigate whether Cruz had leaked classified information during a debate in Las Vegas. Burr tried to walk that back too.

So it seems that Senator Burr hates Ted Cruz so much for actually fighting for conservative principles in the Senate that he would prefer to elect a self-described "socialist" as President of the United States.

It's truly outrageous.

Senator Burr has lost his way. If this wasn't clear before, it is now.

Please make a quick phone call to one of Senator Burr's offices below and let him know what you think.
  • Washington, DC - (202) 224-3154
  • Asheville, NC - (828) 350-2437
  • Gastonia, NC - (704) 833-0854
  • Winston-Salem, NC - (336) 631-5125
  • Wilmington, NC - (910) 251-1058
  • Rocky Mount, NC - (252) 977-9522
Tell him that if he supports a liberal socialist for president over a proven conservative, then he shouldn't be surprised if Republican voters don't support him in his election.

If his office denies the report, ask them why he constantly votes with the Democrats on things like the omnibus bill and has a liberal "F" grade from Conservative Review.

Senators like Richard Burr are the reason why so many Americans are fed up with Republicans in Washington, and they need to be replaced with conservatives who believe in our principles.

Thank you for standing strong for freedom and holding our elected representatives accountable.

Ken Cuccinelli II
Ken Cuccinelli II
Senate Conservatives Fund
@KenCuccinelli / @SCF

Friday, January 22, 2016

Uh-Oh! No more cover for the Justice Department in the Fast and Furious gun running scandal. It looks as if even the Judge wants to get to the bottom of all of this.


AP Report:
A federal judge on Tuesday rejected the Justice Department’s claim of executive privilege used to withhold certain documents tied to the Fast and Furious “gun-walking” scandal from release to a congressional committee.
House Republicans sued in federal court in 2012 to obtain thousands of emails related to the botch effort by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to track guns across the Southwest border. 

Revelations of the operation created a political firestorm and set off a documents dispute between former Attorney General Eric Holder and Congress that resulted in Holder being held in contempt of Congress.
The Justice Department had already produced tens of thousands of pages of documents, but Congress continued to seek additional records that the department argued it was entitled to withhold.

Trump Could Be Subpoenaed To Testify In This Major Case For A Reason He Wasn’t Expecting

... Scrap Its Nuclear Weapons To Keep Them Away From 'President Trump


Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s defense team may call Donald Trump as a witness in their client’s court-martial proceedings, according to a court filing.
The attorneys argue that the presidential candidate’s frequent negative references to the Army sergeant are prejudicing the potential court martial panel.
“We’ve made no decision yet on whether to call Mr. Trump as a witness,” attorney Eugene Fidell told Bloomberg View on Friday. “We continue to monitor his defamatory statements.”
Bergdahl, 29, was arraigned at Fort Bragg, N.C., last month on charges of desertion and misbehavior before the enemy. The latter charge carries a potential life sentence, while the former can lead to the soldier’s imprisonment for up to five years.

Bergdahl left his post in Afghanistan in June 2009 and subsequently became a Taliban prisoner, until his release in May 2014 in exchange for the so-called “Taliban Five,” being held at the Guantanamo Bay.
Trump has been a harsh critic of the prisoner exchange of a “no-good traitor” for five top Taliban leaders, labeling it yet another example of the Obama administration’s gross failures.

The candidate “vowed last month to review the soldier’s case if elected president, adding that similar incidents in the past have ended in military executions,” The Hill reported. 
“Fifty years ago, what would’ve happened?” Trump asked during a rally in Las Vegas on Dec. 15, 2015.
“Boom,” he added, pretending to fire an imaginary rifle into the air.
Fidell wants Trump to stop speaking about Bergdahl in this light, or the public to be granted access to court documents in the case. “The court has not yet released a pretrial report by Major General Kenneth Dahl, which reportedly concludes that Bergdahl should not face any additional imprisonment related to his actions,” Bloomberg reported. 
“Mr. Trump and the echo chamber that has amplified his voice beyond all reason have a right to free speech,” Fidell wrote in his court filing. “Simple fairness demands that Sgt. Bergdahl at least be able to defend himself by permitting public access in real time to documents that put the lie to the kind of character assassination to which he is being subjected.” 
Bergdahl told investigators that he left his post to get the attention of people high in the chain-of-command, so he could air grievances about his unit, according to the Washington Post.
In an interview with Serial released last month, he said his plan was to travel from his outpost to higher headquarters, but got lost along the way.
h/t: TheBlaze

Martial Law Bill Sneaked Through By Senate

Is Martial Law how Obama plans on keeping power this fall? I don’t see him going quietly and giving up power willingly.
Check it out:
Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell is attempting to fast track a “war powers” bill that will allow President Obama nearly unlimited power to deploy the military anywhere in the world for any length of time – including on U.S. soil.
“The AUMF put for­ward by Mc­Con­nell would not re­strict the pres­id­ent’s use of ground troops, nor have any lim­its re­lated to time or geo­graphy,” Defense One reported.
In other words, the authorization allows the president to deploy the military at his discretion – both foreign and domestic.
Several senators, including Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Whip John Cornyn, were surprised by McDonnell’s decision to fast-track the bill after a year of deep in-fighting over similar measures in the Senate.
“He did?” he asked Na­tion­al Journ­al on Thursday morn­ing when reporters informed him about the bill.
Cornyn added he was unaware what McConnell was doing. 

Cruz or Tyranny: Two Important Questions Conservatives Aren't Asking for 2016

by: Carl Jackson
I feel like an "outsider" amongst my own people - not blacks, but conservatives. Conservatism is as conservatism does, or at least it used to be that way just one year ago.
President Obama missed his opportunity to strengthen America. Are we going to miss ours? Those that elected him hoped he would unite our country among racial and ethnic lines, strengthen relationships with our global allies, and fix a perceived "economic crisis," which in comparison to today's national debt and annual deficit spending seems more and more like a balanced budget. I'm convinced our generation will get one shot to fundamentally restore our constitutional values. This election is that important! Are we seriously going to choose the wrong leader at the right time? Admittedly, I'm beginning to think so.

Six months ago, I would've never imagined so many "conservatives" could potentially become as detrimental to the future of America as Obama voters - either unable or unwilling to discern effective rhetoric from reality, campaign tactics from core convictions. Amongst the so-called "establishment," "bipartisanship" has become code language for choosing a political party over principles. Likewise, and even more disturbing, many in the conservative movement have quickly fallen prey to populism despite tangible evidence of waffling convictions from our leading candidate, Donald Trump. I assumed conservatives would settle for nothing less than a proven constitutionalist in the White House this time around. Someone that would work to restore our Judeo-Christian heritage and reestablish the rule of law and our Separation-of-Powers, as outlined by our Constitution. Boy, was I wrong.
It's uniquely possible that the very movement that rose up to save America, the Tea Party, may be remembered in light of history as accomplices to her demise. I refuse to be one of them, and you can too.

Understanding how far left America has shifted under President Obama's reign, Republicans are rightfully asking "who's most capable of defeating Hillary Clinton in the general election?" It's a fair question given she'd be the third term of Obama. However, it isn't the only question we should be asking.
We have the opportunity of a lifetime! Were we to win the White House with a candidate that campaigns as a conservative but governs as a moderate, we may skip an entire generation of voters who have never seen a "real conservative" in the White House. Can you imagine an entire generation of kids who were never taught about the importance of our Judeo-Christian heritage, our Constitution, free speech, religious freedom, the Second Amendment, free market capitalism, less government intrusion, and maintaining a strong military force? Imagine no more - we're there!
The good news however, is that we're not so far removed from the Constitution that it can't be restored. The bad news unfortunately, is if a proven moderate to Progressive like Donald Trump, or socialists like Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders were to win the election, America as we've known her is done.

We all "want" our candidate to win. But at what cost? What we "need" is a devout constitutionalist. Stop and ask yourself, is your guy or gal the right one for such a time as this in American history? How can you know? You have to look beyond November! In Exodus 18:21 Moses' father-in-law, Jethro, encouraged Moses to choose good men amongst the Israelites to help him judge and settle disputes so that he wouldn't wear himself out. The criteria was as follows (ASV): " shall select out of all the people able men who fear God, men of truth, those who hate dishonest gain..."
Stop! Think! Who should that eliminate from the race? Furthermore, knowing that, consider these two questions before you choose your candidate:

1) Which candidate is most likely to begin restoring our Constitutional heritage by listening to "We The People," respecting the boundaries of the Separation of Powers, reducing the overall size of the federal government and its bureaucracies, nominate constitutional Originalist to the Supreme Court, and abide by the 10th Amendment, leaving all decisions to the states that are not outlined in the Constitution?
2) Which candidate has the proven moral leadership over a long period of time, as well as the training and expertise to utilize our three branches of government effectively without over stepping their bounds?
We all want a fighter, but what about a Constitutionalist? Have you asked that? A good president won't be good enough this year! A good president, without a fundamental understanding of who God is and why He matters, as well as why our founding documents are exceptional, may cut taxes for a spell, build up our military, defeat ISIS, build walls on our borders, but yet and still neglect to change the trajectory of our out of control federal government. Can you say George W. Bush?

Have we become so blinded by our disgust with the GOP "establishment," that we've become more anti-establishment than conservative? Let me be Frank, Ted Cruz is everything Donald Trump is portraying himself to be. It is the difference between a man campaigning and a man with core convictions. We could get as many as four Supreme Court picks during the next presidency. Ted Cruz is the only one with the expertise to make sure we get Originalists on the bench. I hoped we conservatives learned our lesson after Obama won the White House.
"Hope and change," has been replaced by "Make America Great Again." I don't want a "great America!" I want an "exceptional America." There's a huge (say huge like Trump) difference! When are we going to start choosing morality over mantra? Thus far, apparently not in 2016.

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Back to square one with Donald Trump 'Carnival Barker'

So take a minute and tell us what you think of Trump the Trickster by ...
Alrighty then IMHO Donald Trump has crossed the proverbial line of  campaigning on merit to one of pure trash talk and slogans akin to the King of Spam Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is.  
I'm sorry but it has become tiring to say the least! 


I have been up and down on Donald Trump since he announced running for POTUS so now I am back to the first article I posted when he announced! "Carnival Barker" : 

The Marine Corps Times Is Calling for Veterans to Violate Their Oath

<br /><b>Warning</b>: Illegal string offset 'alt' in <b>/home/freedomoutpost/public_html/wp-content/themes/politicsisdirty/fo-responsive-email-template.php</b> on line <b>216</b><br />h


Taking a position which opposes the very oath that veterans swore to uphold, the Marine Corps Times is advising veterans to "… lead the push for more secure gun laws," in a tweet sent out earlier this week: a story first covered by Breitbart. It is stated on their website that the Marine Corps Times does not officially represent the US Marines, and I can tell you for certain that their views on this issue do not represent ANY of the former marines I know, and I know a few pretty well.

I'm not sure where the guy's head was when he penned his article, but one can only assume that he was merely posing as a patriot when he took his oath to defend the Constitution. And from what I understand by talking to my numerous friends in Oath Keepers, the oath that is sworn to the US Constitution is one that remains in effect until death, even if you become a writer on a big website.

Although the aforementioned Breitbart article covered the story nicely, they didn't go nearly far enough to admonish the Marine Corps Times writer, in my opinion; the writer is basically calling for stricter gun control in a time where guns are the only thing keeping us out of chains, literally. As I said earlier, I'm sure that this "patriot poser" does not represent many actual Marines, but one cannot deny the possible psychological impact of his article.
In conclusion, I wanted to re-post an interview that I conducted while broadcasting for The Liberty Brothers Radio Show. The interview is with Chris "Tonto" Paronto, who is one of the soldiers abandoned by Hillary Clinton's State Department in the Benghazi scandal, a story that has now been recently made into a major motion picture. Although I have yet to meet Chris personally, I have had the pleasure of speaking to him by phone numerous times and interviewing him twice. I wanted to post the video below as a counter-balance to the trash proposed by the Marine Corps Times….enjoy

Article reposted with permission from NorthWest Liberty News,

The Washington Cartel Lines up behind...Trump?

Reigniting the Promise
Dear Conservative,

To say that Ted Cruz is under attack would be an understatement.
What we’ve witnessed in the past few days is the establishment coming at Ted with everything they have. And Donald Trump is their lead spokesperson.
Let me explain.
Donald Trump has positioned himself as a Washington outsider, taking no flak from anyone. Unfortunately, many conservatives have been seduced by his fierce rhetoric without vetting his credentials and record.
The truth is, Donald Trump is deeply entrenched within the Washington Cartel, and he has been for years.
He began showing his true colors this week when he attacked Ted Cruz for his promise to end all taxpayer-funded subsidies to oil, ethanol, and sugar lobbies. Instead, Trump proposed to double subsidies to the ethanol industry in order to win their support of his Iowa campaign.
 Nothing says “crony capitalism” more than government handouts to cherry-picked corporations. Yet Donald Trump embraces them, and even wants to expand them beyond what Barack Obama has done.
Donald Trump actually went so far as to call Ted Cruz “worse than Hillary Clinton” because he wants to stop sending our tax dollars to crony capitalists in the ethanol industry.
Trump then went on to boast, “We’ve been contacted by all of the Establishment types. They all want to know how do they get involved with the campaign.”
When Donald Trump begins to brag that the Washington Establishment is clamoring to work with him, it can mean only one thing… they are more terrified of Ted Cruz than they are of Donald Trump.
Need proof? Just yesterday, Bob Dole – a Republican who opposed Ronald Reagan in 1980 - said that Donald Trump would be a better choice than Ted Cruz because he could “work with” the Democrats in Congress. “He’s kind of a deal maker.” 
The Washington Cartel is making their move. They are abandoning Marco Rubio because they know he can’t win, and they are moving their support to Donald Trump, their new favorite “deal maker.”
Once again, the Establishment is trying to silence us and hand-pick a nominee who will cut deals with the liberals, rather than fight to bring our nation back from the brink.
Thankfully, grassroots conservatives are coalescing behind Ted Cruz because they know he is the proven conservative we can trust to take down the Washington Cartel - not cut deals with them.
If you haven’t already, check out our recent video on the stunning array of conservative leaders that have endorsed Ted - the most amazing nationwide convergence of conservatives since Ronald Reagan.
The choice is clear. “We the People” can either nominate Donald Trump, the choice of the Washington Cartel, or Ted Cruz, the proven conservative we can trust to keep his word.
Here at Reigniting the Promise, we’ve chosen Ted Cruz. We can count on Ted to reignite the promise of America.
Will you join us?
We are a group of dedicated conservatives fighting against the Washington Establishment. We currently have boots on the ground in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina helping to get Ted Cruz elected president.
Unlike Donald Trump, we don’t receive limitless funds or free airtime. But we do have a solid ground game that’s charging ahead to ensure victory for Ted Cruz in key primary states. Are you ready to join us?
If you can’t volunteer, then please consider a financial contribution. Remember, every dollar you give goes toward defeating Donald Trump and the Washington Cartel and helps send Ted Cruz, the proven conservative we can trust, to the White House in 2016.
Thank you so much for your generous support.
For America,
Reigniting the Promise

Paid for by Keep the Promise III PAC (
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Stacey Dash BLASTS Black History Month, BET And Spike Lee & Jada Smith’s Oscar Boycott

Stacey Dash is ticking off A LOT of people on the left with her comments about The Oscar’s and Black History Month.
Stacey Dash criticized those who have come out against the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences over the complete absence of non-white acting nominees at this year’s Oscars – and called for the elimination of Black History Month and the cable channel BET.
Dash called the actions of stars like Jada Pinkett Smith and Spike Lee to boycott the Oscars ‘ludicrous,’ and then took things a step further. 

‘We have to make up our minds,’ Dash said during an appearance on Fox & Friends.
‘Either we want to have segregation or integration. And if we don’t want segregation, then we need to get rid of channels like BET [Black Entertainment Television] and the BET Awards and the Image Awards where you’re only awarded if you’re black.’
She then added: ‘If it were the other way around, we would be up in arms. It’s a double standard.’ 

Dash did not stop there either, saying later in the interview when again asked if BET should be on air: ‘No, I don’t think so, no. Just like there shouldn’t be a Black History Month. You know? We’re Americans. Period. That’s it.’
Read more: Daily Mail
Here’s how BET responded:
BET then chimed in via Twitter, linking to a gallery produced by its website titled “Every Time Stacey Dash Proved She Was Clueless.” The network featured some of Dash’s recent controversies, including her comments from Wednesday morning. “She thinks there needs to be a white history month too, since, you know, our ancestors apparently fought for nothing,” BET’s caption read. “Clueless indeed.”

Every Time Stacey Dash Proved She Was Clueless:

Judge Rules against Obama’s Use of Executive Privilege on Fast and Furious

It appears that Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah has once again acted wrong in the keeping of records about the notorious and criminal Operation Fast and Furious from Congress by executive privilege.  
On Tuesday, US District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson determined that Obama's use of executive privilege was not necessarily one of impropriety, but said that in light of other information the Justice Department had already released could not be sustained.
"This ruling is not predicated on a finding that the withholding was intended to cloak wrongdoing on the part of government officials or that the withholding itself was improper," Judge Jackson wrote.

"There is no need to balance the need against the impact that the revelation of any record could have on candor in future executive decision making, since any harm that might flow from the public revelation of the deliberations at issue here has already been self-inflicted," Jackson added. "The Department itself has already publicly revealed the sum and substance of the very material it is now seeking to withhold. Since any harm that would flow from the disclosures sought here would be merely incremental, the records must be produced."
She ordered the administration to release all of the documents Congress requested from former Department of Justice Attorney General Eric Holder that pertain to Fast and Furious. 

The Hill reports:
The ruling also requires the administration to release to Congress all "segregable portions" of records they are withholding that are considered "attorney-client privileged material, attorney work product, private information, law enforcement sensitive material, or foreign policy sensitive material."
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), chairman of the House oversight committee, issued a statement on the ruling saying, "While the decision doesn't give us access to all the documents, it is an important step forward. We will continue investigating until we get to the truth."   

Rep. Chaffetz, we know the truth about Fast and Furious. We know that the Obama administration has illegally put guns in the hands of Mexican drug cartels, which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of Mexicans and at least two federal agents. We know that they used it to demonize American gun shops and gun owners and attack the Second Amendment. We know that the authorization for this lawless operation was signed off by Eric Holder. We know and it so does your committee, but getting at the truth and bringing forth justice doesn't seem to be what Congress is after.
Personally, I think all of this is nothing more than political maneuvers in an election year. My goodness, it was this same WWE Smackdown scenario that was taking place during the 2012 elections! That was four years ago!

Though Holder has been held in contempt of Congress because he would not turn over the requested documents, nothing has come of it. It is past time for the American people to deal not only with the criminal in the White House, but also the criminals in Congress who are covering for him by their inaction (and no, hearings and findings are not action). Let's bring about resolve for a change.


Machine Gun Jihadists Met 72 Virgins REAL Fast When This SNIPER Whacked Him

WARNING: This video is GRAPHIC.
These Muslim Jihadists were in for a big surprise when they decided to start shooting their machine guns. This sniper came in at just the right time.

Share if you think this is awesome

#OathKeepers :" WACO: A NEW REVELATION... Redax Clinton/Obama/Trump ?

waco never forget
While the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is taking it on the chin in the western States the current occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon has prompted Oath Keepers Founder and President Stewart Rhodes to issue a cautionary warning which is going viral across America:

“Warning to U.S. Military and Federal LEOs: Do Not Follow Orders to “Waco” Ammon Bundy Occupation, or Risk Civil War”

Of particular interest to me is Stewart’s use of the name “Waco”.
On April 19 in 2016 the nation will reflect once again on Waco. The date will mark the twenty-third anniversary of one of the most cruel, insane, and even demonic actions ever perpetrated by the U.S. government upon its own citizens. It is not the only cruel and insane event done by government to the governed, but it is one of the most horrendous.

As an older man I recall seeing the burning of that church in Texas while at a restaurant in Georgia. The entire restaurant was glued to the TV screen in disbelief. All we had heard was that the church had been molesting little children and manufacturing illegal drugs. That, a sickened nation would later learn, was a pack of lies made up by the ATF and presented to the Pentagon in hopes of getting military aid in resolving the standoff which resulted from the botched raid on the church.
The church had been assaulted by the ATF in a very stupid raid to garner support for the ATF’s increased budget requests due before Congress, a fact we learned in retrospect from the Dallas Morning News. As it turns out, the ATF had notified the press that there would be a newsworthy event at Waco and the ATF actually requested media coverage. Why? 

The ATF felt they needed something big in “the news” to push through their requested budget increases. So goes the logic of government agencies, because government agencies, as our nation’s Founders well knew, by their very nature become ruthless infrastructural mechanisms of self-perpetuation.


So Waco has become an undying testament to the inherent abusive nature of government. The recognition of that nature, by our Founders, has much to do with why there is a Bill of Rights attached to the Constitution. But the ATF could not care less about the original intent of the Founders. Nope! The ATF marches to the beat of its own drums, fully-well knowing that according to the Constitution the agency does not even have any legitimate authority to exist, much less the authority to murder scores of women and children in horrible fiery deaths over some alleged “gun violations”. My God! The document says “...shall not be infringed.”  All the ATF does is infringe, and it cares not one whit about your or my unalienable rights or our Constitutional protections as American citizens. Nope. The ATF is hell-bent on tormenting anyone who would dare stand up for the fuller meaning of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
But while most readers here already know such truths, I would like to invite everyone to carefully view a movie which has been around for more than fifteen years. Those who have seen this film will learn yet more by watching it again, as I do each time I review it. Those who have not seen this owe it to themselves to inform themselves with the ghastly truth of the outright evil and domestic terror perpetrated by the ATF on a church full of good American citizens. The movie reveals the government’s feeble and vain attempts to cover-up the ATF’s sins in Congressional hearings.

Charles Schumer
Pay close attention to Charles Schumer’s wicked facial expressions.

After watching this film, allow oneself to reflect upon what is behind Mike Vanderboegh’s famous statement, “No more free Wacos”. Then one will more fully understand why Stewart Rhodes alluded to Waco in his open letter to the military and enforcement agents who are being pulled into a possible confrontation with American citizens at Burns, Oregon. 

Elias Alias, editor

Joe Biden: “The Second Amendment Says You Can Limit Who Can Own a Gun”

Biden Makes a Gaffe - Funny Joe Biden Picture


Vice President Joe Biden is at it again, putting things in the Constitution that aren't there and then attempting to go after guns just like he and his partner in crime, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah, has done. Only this time, he is actually stating, "The Second Amendment says you can limit who can own a gun." 
Uncle Joe Biden makes funny....
This week, he was interviewed on CNN by Gloria Borger.
"The Second Amendment says you can limit who can own a gun," he said.
Biden told Borger, "People who are criminals shouldn't have guns. People who are schizophrenic and have mental illnesses shouldn't have guns."

Actually, the Second Amendment doesn't say anything about limiting who can own a gun at all. In fact, it speaks clearly about not infringing on the right to keep and bear arms.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." 

While one can see that when a criminal engages in a violent crime, they are relinquishing rights due to their criminal activity. However, the issue of mental health and other things like that do not give government a reason to remove those people's rights. That is an issue that family should be involved in, but for government to do that would be tantamount to a clear violation of due process. It would be the same kinds of action that the Obama administration has proposed regarding keeping people from buying guns who they put on the No Fly list for whatever reason them see fit.   

I'll just remind everyone that this is the same Joe Biden that told everyone, following Sandy Hook, that there was no "time to prosecute everybody who lies" on background checks to obtain a gun. Yet, it is the administration of Barack Obama that has not only been pushing for more ridiculous restrictions regarding background checks that fails to prosecute those who lie their way through the process.
Not only that, but we discovered that the feds are using the NICS system to build an illegal gun registry.
No, Joe. There is nothing in the Second Amendment that says what you just said. In fact, there is everything in that Amendment that contradicts what you just said.

Obama Claims to have taught Constitutional Law, but Here’s What He Really did at the University of Chicago

Constitutional quandary - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR DOESN'T ...
During a townhall meeting on guns, which I wrote about here, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah said, "I believe in the Second Amendment. It is there, written on the paper. It guarantees a right to bear arms. No matter how many times people try to twist my words around — I taught constitutional law, I know a little bit about this — I get it." However, one writer has sought to clarify that Obama was not actually a professor, which means he never taught constitutional law.   

Karin McQuillan writes at American Thinker:
Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturerHe did not have the qualifications to be a professor.  Obama never published a single law paper.  He was hired by the University of Chicago when they learned he had been given a book contract on race and law directly after graduating from Harvard.  There was no book – just the contract, which he later reneged on.  This is not the normal level of accomplishment for a University of Chicago professor or even lecturer.
Well, I suppose Obama's deception and outright lies are par for the course. So, no one is surprised by them. In fact, many have questioned his mental stability as a result of his chronic lying. The irony is that he has used the mental health issue to go after people's guns, especially our veterans.
So, if he didn't actually teach constitutional law as he claims, then what did he do?

McQuillan continues:
Obama did not specialize in the Constitution.  Obama cared about and taught only one subject: race.  One course was about race in the Constitution.  It is on this flimsy basis that he attempts to pawn himself off as a constitutional scholar.As the New York Times explains, Obama the lecturer taught three subjects only: "race, rights and gender."
His most traditional course was in the due process and equal protection areas of constitutional law. His voting rights class traced the evolution of election law, from the disenfranchisement of blacks to contemporary debates over districting and campaign finance. …His most original course, a historical and political seminar as much as a legal one, was on racism and law…

Well, that certainly explains what he has promoted, doesn't it? Each and every one of those things that he lectured on was nothing more than the very things he has used to divide our country in order for his criminal administration to take advantage of the people and oppress them.
I'm thankful to Ms. McQuillan for pointing this out. It's just another reason that Congress should be drawing up articles of impeachment, but because they are too cowardly to do it because they'll be called racist, they are just as guilty of covering for the liar-in-chief and are no more trustworthy than he is.


Tuesday, January 19, 2016

BREAKING: It Looks Like Sarah Palin’s About To Endorse Trump
oped: .@SarahPalinUSA .@AllenWest just a little advice from a soldier from the past...slow down and smell the flowers before y'all jump on the Trump' Little Red Wagon' [like the country song]...his past is what it is...he trained #Obama on "Yes we Can" a matter of fact this was the slogan 'The Donald' gave to Barry 2008 while supporting John McCain & Sarah Palin and yes The Donald was a progressive Dem and voted for Obama's 2nd term . 
I'm not saying people can't change ( and I truly hope the Donald has~ but the skeptic and soldier in me remains guarded)...therefore  be very careful before you put your credibility at risk and jump through the proverbial hoops based on 'YES We Can' a real leader leads...first one in last one out akin to LTC Moore (LTC West should be familiar with this)..I have not seen this in the Donald yet! Talk and diatribes are what #Obama campaigned on (False Promises)...#THINK

It looks like everything is lining up for Sarah Palin’s endorsement of Donald Trump.
I’ll admit it — when this speculation began mounting yesterday, I wasn’t remotely sold on the idea that Palin was poised jump aboard the Trump Train when so many influential figures within the conservative talk radio constellation are at long last blasting The Donald and rallying to Cruz. The Palin speculation seemed even less plausible when this rumor leaked:

Steve Deace @SteveDeaceShow
Multiple little birdies tell me Jerry Falwell, Jr. is going to endorse Trump for president and come to Iowa with him tomorrow.
Matt Popsicle @mpopv
Wow. Palin's jet following Trump campaign; endorsement imminent. Broken via flight records: 

 Interesting. But so what if there’s a private jet bound from Anchorage to Iowa? That could be a coincidence. Or…uh, maybe not:

Liam Donovan @LPDonovan
Something perfect about the Palin-Trump story being broken by enterprising freepers stalking flightaware