Homosexual Hate Campaign Targets a Woman who Doesn’t Know Her Place
I missed this amazing and sickening piece when it came out—written by Janna Darnelle, a wife and mother whose marriage ended when her former husband left her for a man—or really a string of men (see below on the nature of their alleged “marriage”).
A couple of quotations:
I missed this amazing and sickening piece when it came out—written by Janna Darnelle, a wife and mother whose marriage ended when her former husband left her for a man—or really a string of men (see below on the nature of their alleged “marriage”).
A couple of quotations:
Try as I might to save our marriage, there
was no stopping my husband. Our divorce was not settled in mediation or
with lawyers. No, it went all the way to trial. My husband wanted
primary custody of our children. His entire case can be summed up in one
sentence: “I am gay, and I deserve my rights.” It worked: the judge
gave him practically everything he wanted. At one point, he even told my
husband, “If you had asked for more, I would have given it to you.”
I truly believe that judge was legislating
from the bench, disregarding the facts of our particular case and
simply using us—using our children— to help influence
future cases. In our society, LGBT citizens are seen as marginalized
victims who must be protected at all costs, even if it means stripping
rights from others. By ignoring the injustice committed against me and
my children, the judge seemed to think that he was correcting a larger
injustice.
And then this:
My ex-husband and his partner went on
to marry. Their first ceremony took place before our state redefined
marriage. After it created same-sex marriage, they chose to have a
repeat performance. In both cases, my children were forced—against my
will and theirs—to participate. At the second ceremony, which included
more than twenty couples, local news stations and papers were there to
document the first gay weddings officiated in our state. USA Today did a
photo journal shoot on my ex and his partner, my children, and even the
grandparents. I was not notified that this was taking place, nor was I
given a voice to object to our children being used as props to promote
same-sex marriage in the media.
At the time of the first ceremony,
the marriage was not recognized by our state, our nation, or our church.
And my ex-husband’s new marriage, like the majority of male-male
relationships, is an “open,” non-exclusive relationship.
Yeah, that’s the role model you want to
have partial custody of your children. (Yes, they are his children too,
but he left them and is only hanging on to them as set pieces for his
fantasy role playing game.)
After our children’s pictures were publicized, a flood of comments and posts appeared. Commenters
exclaimed at how beautiful this gay family was and congratulated my
ex-husband and his new partner on the family that they “created.”
But there is a significant person missing from those pictures: the
mother and abandoned wife. That “gay family” could not exist without me.
As far as I know this story was ignored in the mainstream media. However, it was virulently attacked through the internet, and at the writer’s place of employment. Yesterday, this post
was published at the Public Discourse blog of the Witherspoon Institute
(which also published the original piece). It is a response to the hate
campaign: “I will comment not only as a former child who was once all
smiles in those pictures, but also as an academic, a woman, a mother,
and a feminist.”
Here we learn that the un-named
ex-husband and current sodomite put out his ex-wife’s full legal name on
the internet so that she could be targeted for harassment.
For those of you who avoid the
subterranean landscape of online same-sex parenting debates, it is
useful to be introduced to Scott “Rose” Rosenzweig, a virulently
misogynistic LGBT activist. As soon as Darnelle’s essay was published,
Rose went into action, darting from the blog Good As You to other sites
in an effort to destroy her personally. (Rose’s obsessive internet
commenting has attracted attention at other news outlets as well.) […]
Janna Darnelle wrote under a pen name
in order to protect her family. Unfortunately, her ex-husband’s
comments helped Scott Rose embark on a campaign of harassment and
intimidation.
Rose even contacted her employer to get her fired.
Sadly, all of this conforms to a
predictable pattern of attack. If you study the routine that plays out
whenever Jeremy Hooper and Scott Rose conspire to take someone out, you
will see seasoned patterns. Four steps comprise their usual character
assassination.
First, they call the individual a
liar and say the person’s existence cannot be verified without more data
about him or her. Second, once Hooper and Rose have such data, they
write to the person’s employer to get him or her fired or professionally
destroyed. Third, if they cannot get the person fired, Hooper and Rose
go after the family members. Fourth, if they cannot turn the person’s
family against him or her, Hooper and Rose blast endless broadsides
against the person, trying to make him or her feel afraid or unsafe at
all times.
I have only pointed to a small portion of this amazing expose. It demonstrates that the incredible hate and intolerance displayed by homosexuals in public is only a small part of what they are capable of.
This second piece is more than a report
on homosexual hate; it also dissects the values embodied in male
homosexual advocacy. For example:
The “unfit mother” trope is very
important to men like Hooper and Rose, because it helps justify taking
women’s children, eggs, or the use of their uteri. Darnelle is right.
Many families headed by gay male couples are built upon exploitation of
women. Practically speaking, Jeremy Hooper, Scott Rose, and their
compatriots have formed a men’s rights group that seeks to use women as
breeders. These egg donors and surrogate mothers supply infants for a
bustling market full of same-sex couples, for whom reproduction is
naturally and biologically impossible.
In the name of equality, groups such
as GLAAD (which employs Jeremy Hooper) have pushed through gender
identity laws that have legally erased women. The term “woman” now
legally can refer to the way that a man chooses to identify himself.
Once women have been erased legally as a group and as individuals, it is
not hard to erase “mothers.” This lends support to the practice of
using one woman’s eggs and another woman’s womb to supply children for
gay male couples, obscuring the concept of motherhood and making it seem
dispensable.
This is an interesting way to think of the
phenomenon of men “coming out” after years of marriage, when a woman
has lost her youth in part due to her willingness to bear a man’s
children on the mistaken premise that he will stay true to her and them.
He gets to satisfy the urge to reproduce and then goes off into a happy
hunting ground of lawless sexual experiences. The ex-wife exists to
give him the privilege of parenting part-time.
No comments:
Post a Comment