by
House Bill 603 requires any government to get a probable cause-based warrant before anyone’s electronic devices can be spied on. The law passed the Montana State Senate in April and was signed into law in May. It never really made any headlines, because it was all done before anyone heard the name Edward Snowden. I mean, most of us knew that the government was spying on everybody, but that was all a conspiracy theory until the media admitted it and then tried justifying it on “national security” grounds. So, H.B. 603 has been Montana law for several weeks now. Here’s what the law states:
Section 1. Location information privacy -- civil penalty. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a
government entity may not obtain the location information of an
electronic device without a search warrant issued by a duly authorized
court.
(1) "Electronic communication
service" means a service that provides to users of the service the
ability to send or receive wire or electronic communications.
(2) "Electronic device" means a
device that enables access to or use of an electronic communication
service, remote computing service, or location information service.
So, basically, cell phones, laptops and tablets are off limits from
the government’s nosy ears. Unless, of course, they obtain a warrant.
And yes, there are a few other exceptions listed in subsection (2). They
can track your location if any of these conditions is met:
(a) the device is reported stolen by
the owner;
(b) in order to respond to the user's call for emergency
services;
(c) with the informed, affirmative consent of the owner or
user of the electronic device; or
(d) there exists a possible
life-threatening situation.
(3) Any evidence obtained in
violation of this section is not admissible in a civil, criminal, or
administrative proceeding and may not be used in an affidavit of
probable cause in an effort to obtain a search warrant. (4) A violation
of this section will result in a civil fine not to exceed $50.
Will the NSA even care about Montana’s new law? Probably not. They
can do whatever they want, and they’ll even claim that they’re within
the state law’s limits under subsection (2)(d). They’ll claim that there
exists a “possible” life-threatening situation with the possibility of a
terrorist attack. I’m sure the Department of Justice will sue Montana
on the grounds that it is “obstructing” their investigation of
Montanans.But at least it’s something. What we need are laws like this except with real teeth and state representatives and governors who will stand their ground against the feds.
No comments:
Post a Comment