by
Ryan Hunter
The topic of gun-control has spurred countless debates about whether
or not eliminating guns will lower crime. School shootings are cited,
eliciting emotions that urge us to protect our children at all costs.
Crime rates are posted, with pleas to give up this one little freedom so
we can have more security.
Most of us don’t hunt for our food or belong to a militia, so why the
debate over gun-control? Because gun control isn’t just about the guns.
We know for a fact that gun control does not lower crime. Researchers
from the University of Melbourne, concerning Australian gun laws, have
said, “There is little evidence to suggest that it had any significant
effects on firearm homicides or suicides.” In fact, suicides by other
means actually increased after the ban.
The British Shadow Home Secretary, Oliver Letwin, made a similar
statement, “Despite the street crime initiative, robbery is massively
up. So are gun-related crimes, domestic burglary, retail burglary, and
drug offences.”
We’ve even tried a form of gun control ourselves with the assault weapon ban of 1994, which did nothing to deter gun violence.
Wise men learn from the mistakes of others, so why is the federal
government refusing to look at the facts and drop the issue? Because
they’re after something more than our firearms.
In 1788, one of our founding fathers, George Mason, said, “To disarm
the people – that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”
To enslave is to make subservient, to submit or subdue, to subjugate;
and to subjugate is to bring under control, to conquer. And governments
all over the world have used it to conquer their own.
During World War I officials in each Armenian district were ordered
to surrender their firearms. If they did not surrender enough to fill
the quota, they were executed for conspiracy. In March of 1938 the Nazis
established new gun laws targeting Jews. Eight months later they
started a riot against the Jews in which they looted their homes and
businesses.
Journalist Edward Wimberley stated, in an article in Naples News,
“Those regimes seeking to assert and maintain absolute control over the
citizenry will always try to disarm them first by means of confiscation,
regulation, taxation, and through controlling markets for firearms and
ammunition. Without exception, an unarmed citizenry is one that can be
effectively bullied and coerced and are readily controlled by the
government.”
Is the federal government truly seeking to subjugate Americans?
In searching history, the news, and archives, each story of
gun-control ends in higher crime rates, more government control over the
people and abandonment of freedom by the people. Abandonment, because
if the Citizens of the United States don’t stand up for what they
believe, they will be coerced into giving up their freedoms one at a
time until there is nothing left. If that’s allowed to happen, the
government will, indeed, have complete control.
We’re not only seeing this type of dominion in gun-control, but in
the loss of other freedoms, losses which are claimed to provide more
safety and security, but only guarantee enslavement to fear, and to the
government. As I stated in my novel, inDIVISIBLE, “They control us with
fear of terrorism, fear of pandemics, fear of travel, fear of
ourselves.”
One has only to look around to see our basic freedoms being denied,
stripped away from us, and gun-control is just one more step forward in a
push to eliminate the freedoms granted in the constitution.
If left up to the government to decide for us, the American people
will one day be entirely accountable to a government that seeks only to
satisfy its own greed.
Speaking up makes a difference. Writing a
physical letter to your representatives forces them to pay attention. We can’t sit back and watch our nation destruct.
Even the Lord has instructed, in Galatians, 5:1, “Stand fast
therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not
entangled again with the yoke of bondage.”
If we’re instructed to remain free spiritually, doesn’t it make sense we remain free physically?
No comments:
Post a Comment