H R McMaster: Muslim Jihad Groups are "Really Un-Islamic" & "Irreligious"

oped: General McMaster is in need of a refresher course on the Myth of Islam...making excuses will by no means bring this 7th Century Theocracy into the 21st Century...education on what it is all about will...the Catholic church went through this transformation in the 17th Century by stopping the practice of 6th century Cannon law~ separating religion from governance of public law....Islam must do this in order to move into the 21st century...Sharia law must go!
Let me help you begin the journey: 
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2017/06/attn-all-jihad-boys-and-girls-out-there.html



by:Tim Brown 
Seriously, why is this man in the Trump administration?  From a 2014 speech on the Middle East, White House National Security Adviser H. R. McMaster stated that Islamic jihad organizations are “really un-Islamic” and are “really irreligious organizations” who cloak themselves in the “false legitimacy of Islam.”
Like Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah, McMaster is engaged in whitewashing the reality of what Islam actually is and what its 1400-year track record is and what its Koran and founder taught.
Take a listen to the 2014 speech and see if this doesn't sound like BHO's taqiyya claims of Islam.
McMaster's claims about these groups being un-Islamic begin around 9:08.

See video: http://freedomoutpost.com/h-r-mcmaster-muslim-jihad-groups-really-un-islamic-irreligious-video/

"War is profoundly human," McMaster said.  "What do all of these conflicts have in common? Of course, there are a lot of differences, right? And we have to be sensitive to local differences and realities that drive conflict."
"But what you see is you see these really irreligious organizations," he continued.  "These criminal organizations, who cloak themselves in this kind of false legitimacy of Islam. But they are really un-Islamic."
"They want to portray themselves as patrons and protectors of aggrieved parties," added McMaster.  "So their strategy has been to pit communities against each other. Get them to fight each other and then come in as patron and protector and gain control of a chaotic situation and then establish control through brutality, through intimidation. Use control of populations and resources to conduct more attacks, more mass murder of innocent people to drive retribution attacks like you saw maybe these Shia militias conduct this execution in the mosque in Diyala province. That is what they want. They want this kind of cycle of violence to accelerate–to get more and more destructive."

Instead of sighting religious beliefs for the cause of their jihad, which these jihadis do quite often, McMaster mused his on thoughts of motivation behind the attacks.
"And so the drivers of conflict is what we have to remember," McMaster stated.  "What is driving a conflict? Sometimes when we look at very quick and easy military solutions to problem sets, we are not thinking about what is the nature of this conflict. What is the nature of this war? What are the human factors? Really, people fight, I think, for the same reasons the Greek philosopher and historian Thucydides identified 2,500 years ago: Fear. Honor. You might say sense of honor. And interest. So understanding those human dimensions and being able to affect them is important, and we have to remember that."

Really?  He's comparing a Greek philosopher to the ideology of those who follow Muhammed?
No wonder this man is in opposition to everything that President Donald Trump wants to accomplish.
He isn't even on the same page with who the enemies of America are.
Then again, he does have a history with a George Soros funded group and has his own "Huma Abedin" in Dina Habib Powell to help further sanitize the religion of pieces.
He is defended by designated terror organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and fires those who have done their homework on Islam and jihad while allowing known liars and disinformation agents to maintain their top security clearance.

McMaster is bad.  He's bad for the Trump administration, and he's bad for America.

Attn: All Jihad Boys and Girls out there...

Before you strap on your suicide bomb...grab your bazooka,trusty knife and gun please educate yourself on the Myth of Islam... Christianity and Judaism predates Islam by many centuries and went through a period of turmoil... moving forward in time and became truly peaceful... both religions stepped out of the past during the 17th century...being that Islam was established during the 7th Century it is now time to move forward to the 21st century...let me help you:

UpDate The Life and Times of Muhammad..Prophet,Man,King or Myth?

      
oped:
The time has come to revisit Ancient History 101...Islam is not and never will be a religion of Peace...it is nothing more than a 7th Century 'Theocracy' ...The Mullah's,Imams and Clerics of this so called religion of Peace adhere to the teachings of 'Muhammad' only for the power aspect...they could give a hoot less what the Quaran' says or doesn't say as long as the teaching keeps the Serf's in line and under their control. Islam never created anything for the betterment of mankind...they try to claim they are the One and only True' religion...when in fact Muhammad stole from Ancient Sumerian/Syrian text and teachings on the 'One God' [City Temple] Moon and Sun God as well as Egypt's old 'Sun God'...and also from the Old 'Jewish' Torah [Bible] as well as the Christian 'New Testament'...however Muhammad twisted the old teachings to meet his unscruptulous lust for power and perversion !
Ancient Sumeria/Syria produced scientific principles,math,language,advanced farming techniques as well as beer brewing...Islam has produced religious confusion,hate,perversion,intolerance,greed and lust ! You be the Judge...take the time to research on who and what Muhammad and the practice of Islam is all about...
Islam tries to claim what ancient Sumeria/Syria accomplished thousands of years before Islam came into being:

SEE: http://history-world.org/sumeria.htm  http://www.timemaps.com/history/syria-2500bc/ 
http://www.krysstal.com/display_inventions.php?years=3%2C000+BC+to+2%2C000+BC

Click on all of the links and begin your journey to find the truth!

Begin your Journey here the condensed version of the links provided: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/History.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Myths of Muhammad

Muslims often complain of the "misconceptions" about their religion in the West, yet very few seem to know all that much about the true history of Islam and its founder, Muhammad.  As a result, the biggest misconceptions about Islam are often those originating from (and sincerely believed by) Muslims themselves.
As a service to Muslims and infidels alike, we hope to refute the contemporary mythology of Muhammad (popular in the West) by referring to the earliest and most reliable Muslim historians, who based their writings on the narrations of those who actually knew their revered prophet.  The historical compilations of Ibn Ishaq (compiled by Ibn Hisham), al-Tabari, Bukhari and Sahih Muslim are greatly respected in the Muslim academic community as a priceless source of biographical information and the details of Islam's origin and rise to power.  These writings also provide the context for the Qur'an.
 
Understand that it is the Hadith (traditions), Sira (biography of Muhammad) and the Qur'an together that provide the true Islamic counterpart to the Christian Bible and Jewish Torah.  The Qur'an is simply the purported words of Allah arranged in no particular order.  It makes little sense outside of the context provided by the other two sources, and it even explicitly refers devout Muslims to them.
Articles posted here will occasionally be revised and improved, and new ones added.  Readers not familiar with the life of Muhammad may want to consider approaching these myths through our brief article on the history of his life: The Life of Muhammad: An Inconvenient Truth.  It has been updated to include most of the same links found below, and it will help place these debunked myths into historical context - even though it is written from the Muslim point of view. 

Muhammad in Mecca

MYTH: Muhammad was Persecuted for Preaching Islam

MYTH: Muhammad was Tortured by the Meccans

MYTH: The Muslims Suffered Many Deaths at the Hands of Meccan Persecutors

MYTH: The Meccans were the First to Draw Blood in the Conflict with Muslims

MYTH: Muhammad Traveled to Jerusalem

MYTH: Persecution Forced Muhammad and the Muslims to Flee Mecca for Medina

Muhammad in Medina

MYTH: Muhammad was under Persecution by the Meccans in Medina

MYTH: Muhammad Raided Meccan Caravans to Retrieve Stolen Property

MYTH: Muhammad Fought the Battle of Badr in Self-Defense

MYTH: Muhammad was a Brave Warrior who Trusted Allah to Protect Him (Uhud)

MYTH: Muhammad Lived at Peace with the Jews (Part 1 - the Banu Qaynuqa)

MYTH: Muhammad Lived at Peace with the Jews (Part 2 - the Banu Nadir)

MYTH: Muhammad Lived at Peace with the Jews (Part 3 - the Banu Qurayza)

Muhammad the Conqueror

MYTH: Muhammad Only Waged War in Self-Defense

MYTH: Muhammad Never Approved of Rape

MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed Children

MYTH: The Meccans were the First to Break the Treaty of Hudaibiya

MYTH: Muhammad Always Chose Peace over War

MYTH: Islam Made Mecca a More Tolerant City

MYTH: Muhammad was Attacked by a Byzantine (Christian) Army (Coming Soon) 

Muhammad the Moralist

MYTH: Muhammad Never Approved of Murder

MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed Captives

MYTH: Muhammad Condemned Pedophilia

MYTH: Muhammad took Multiple Wives as a Favor to Them

MYTH: Muhammad Never Approved of Dishonesty

MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed Women

MYTH: Muhammad was an Abolitionist

MYTH: Islam Did Away with Superstition

MYTH: Muhammad Never Approved of Torture

MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed the Elderly

MYTH: Muhammad Never Approved of Forcing Conversions to Islam

MYTH: Muhammad was a Forgiving Man

Please remember to check back later as we will be improving and adding to this page.

TheReligionofPeace.com Home Page

©2009 -2010 Site developed by TheReligionofPeace.com  All Rights Reserved

‘Progressive’ Homosexual Activists Say ‘Good’ or ‘Bad’ Doesn’t Matter, It’s the Guns

https://www.oathkeepers.org  

oped: I for one have had enough of the #LGBTQ movement. It is nothing new it dates back to the Roman Empire under Caligula...It had a big resurgence in the 1920's-1945 Germany under Hitler's "Pink Swastika Party" labeled as Democratic Socialists/Nazi Party! See: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html  
More:
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+pink+swastika+party
The Taliban/ISIS  of today are the same as they were during WWII fighting alongside Hitlers elite SS troops in the Middle East campaign...they hate women (used only to procreate to fill the ranks) and prefer raping boys...same as Hitlers Brown Shirts! 

As for #POTUS44 Barry Barack Hussein Obama... he is not only the New Anthony Johnson but also the new leader of the Pink Swastika Party! See: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/barry-barack-obama-is-new-anthony.html 
Click on all of the links posted and let your journey for the truth begin!

As for ISIS/Taliban/CAIR nothing new here same ol' same ol' 7th Century Barbaric Theology See:
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+myth+of+islam




by: David Codrea 


“Don’t Take Your Eyes Off the Issue of Our Time – Gun Control,” The Advocate, self-identifying as a “the world’s leading gay news source” urges. Springboarding off the massacre at the “gun-free” Pulse nightclub by a bigoted Islamist (who some reports have identified as a club patron who had hookup sex with men, and whose former wife claimed the FBI tried to bury that information), authors Igor Volsky and Mark Glaze unintentionally do gun owner rights supporters a service. That’s because by taking off the mask, they show the “common sense gun safety laws” they demand resemble nothing so much as the state monopoly of violence needed to rule with an iron fist.

Understanding who the authors are helps in understanding how their article advances their agenda. Both are homosexual activists and “progressive” gun-grabbers. Volsky is “Deputy Director for the Center for American Progress Action Fund and former LGBT Editor for ThinkProgress.” Glaze is former executive director of Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown, a senior adviser to GunsDown, and interestingly, the son of a licensed gun dealer.
“LGBTQ people must fight for their safety against the epidemic of gun violence, just as hard as they have fought for equality,” they insist, citing a Southern Poverty Law Center anecdotal “report” on alleged harassment that says nothing about guns, but instead quotes from a handful of unsubstantiated and subjective accounts to smear Donald Trump supporters as intimidating haters.

That’s pretty much SOP for SPLC.
“Already at least seven transgender people have been killed this year — six of whom were killed with a firearm, according to media reports,” Volsky and Glaze continue. “This puts 2017 on a pace to exceed 2016, when at least 27 transgender people were killed. And just like in previous years, the violence has fallen disproportionately on trans women of color.”
Unexamined beyond the listing of names are issues of high-risk associations or that anti-“LGBTQ” hatred has not been proven as a motivating factor.
And instances of killers being “prohibited persons” also means total ban “gun control” edicts were already being violated. That doesn’t matter to Volsky and Glaze.

“Legally obtained or not, whether by ‘good guys’ or ‘bad guys,’ guns are the problem,” they insist. “If we’re serious about saving lives, we need to build a bolder, broader movement that finally tackles the problem at its core. We need to go after guns themselves.”
Actually, if they were serious about saving lives, they’d be out there warning that the greatest threat to health and life among the various sexual practitioners they claim to care about is behavioral and self-inflicted.
“Donald Trump won’t stand in the way. Congress won’t stand in the way,” Volksy and Glaze  promise, casting blame everywhere but on choices and actions. “We can. And together, we must.”
What they plan on doing to the rest of us “standing in the way” is left unsaid, but chances are they’re expecting armed men who took an oath to support the Constitution to carry out their disarmament fantasies for them.

If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work.  You can donate HERE.

There is no Constitutional ‘RIGHT’ to immigrate to America

Let’s end the argument of a RIGHT to immigrate to the United States to rest once and for all. That right does NOT exist. There is no requirement for us to open our borders to anyone and that IS in the Constitution. Groups and nations have been excluded from entering this nation since its founding. Many modern era Presidents have exercised this option. There is NO comparison to any other immigrant event in recorded history. Did you know that Islam is a political system, not a religion? 
oped: Yes indeed...The Myth of Islam...it is a Theocracy masked as a religion...here let me help the dumbed down ones: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-life-and-times-of-muhammad_5191.html 

As Written By Bruce Walker for American Thinker:
There is no right to immigrate to America, and there is no duty America owes the world to accept refugees.  The pathos of leftism on this phony moral obligation invariably reverts back to the tragic efforts of German Jews to leave a Nazi world in which they were horribly mistreated.  The connection to the Holocaust, however, is utterly phony.  The overwhelming majority of German Jews did successfully leave Germany and find new homes in other lands.
Almost all the victims of the Holocaust were East European Jews – Polish, Ukrainian, Hungarian, Romanian, Russian, and Lithuanian – and the most open borders imaginable to these wretched victims would hardly have made a dent in the six million murdered by the Nazis and their allies.  The only help for these people was to conquer and occupy the lands they lived in as quickly as possible and then to impose relentlessly the superior values of America and Britain in these conquered lands.

That is, of course, always the only true answer to problems of refugees.  The first mass immigration to America was from persecuted German Catholics and Jews.  The “No Knowing Party” was formed to stop this influx, but what actually did the trick was the unification of Germany into a confederation (misnamed an “empire”) that granted completed social policy to the individual states.  Those German Catholics and Jews whose fathers thought about fleeing instead became patriotic and loyal Germans.
Irish immigration stopped when Ireland gained independence, and Italian immigration stopped when Italy was finally united.  Indeed, in both cases, as their homelands became safe, free, and relatively prosperous, there was a reverse migration of the children and grandchildren of …..
FULL STORY CONTINUES HERE:
Articles: Refugees and the Right to Immigrate

Prosecute #GeorgeSoros #ACLU under the Smith Act (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2385, 2387)

Enough is enough...the time has come to protect our Republic from the onslaught of sedition...that being the destruction of our Constitution/Bill of Rights by George Soros and the ACLU...We have the Congress/Senate and POTUS along with appointed cabinet heads DOJ/FBI etal
See : http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2017/01/soros-funding-airport-protests-ban.html 

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/04/real-agenda-of-aclu-exposed-at-last.html

The High Court has protected the speech of racial supremacists and separatists, labor organizers, advocates of racial Integration, and opponents of the draft for the Vietnam War. However, it has refused to declare unconstitutional all sedition statutes and prosecutions. In 1940, to silence radicals and quell Nazi or communist subversion during the burgeoning Second World War, Congress enacted the Smith Act (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2385, 2387), which outlawed sedition and seditious conspiracy. The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the act in Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, 71 S. Ct. 857, 95 L. Ed. 1137 (1951). 


Sedition prosecutions are extremely rare, but they do occur. Shortly after the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City, the federal government prosecuted Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, a blind Egyptian cleric living in New Jersey, and nine codefendants on charges of seditious conspiracy. Rahman and the other defendants were convicted of violating the seditious conspiracy statute by engaging in an extensive plot to wage a war of Terrorism against the United States. With the exception of Rahman, they all were arrested while mixing explosives in a garage in Queens, New York, on June 24, 1993.
The defendants committed no overt acts of war, but all were found to have taken substantial steps toward carrying out a plot to levy war against the United States. The government did not have sufficient evidence that Rahman par ticipated in the actual plotting against the government or any other activities to prepare for terrorism. He was instead prosecuted for pro viding religious encouragement to his cocon spirators. Rahman argued that he only performed the function of a cleric and advised followers about the rules of Islam. He and the others were convicted, and on January 17, 1996, Rahman was sentenced to life imprisonment by Judge Michael Mukasey.

Following the September 11th Attacks of 2001, the federal government feared that terrorist networks were very real threats, and that if left unchecked, would lead to further insurrection. As a result, Congress enacted the Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272. Among other things, the act increases the president's authority to seize the property of individuals and organizations that the president determines have planned, authorized, aided, or engaged in hostilities or attacks against the United States.
The events of September 11 also led to the conviction of at least one American. In 2001, U.S. officials captured John Philip Walker Lindh, a U.S. citizen who had trained with terrorist organizations in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Lindh, who became known as the "American Taliban," was indicted on ten counts, including conspiracy to murder U.S. nationals. In October 2002, he was sentenced to 20 years in prison. 

Further readings

Cohan, John Alan. 2003. "Seditious Conspiracy, the Smith Act, and Prosecution for Religious Speech Advocating the Violent Overthrow of Government." St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary 17 (winter-spring).
Curtis, Michael Kent. 1995. "Critics of 'Free Speech' and the Uses of the Past." Constitutional Commentary 12 (spring).——. 1995. "The Curious History of Attempts to Suppress Antislavery Speech, Press, and Petition in 1835–37." Northwestern University Law Review 89 (spring).
Downey, Michael P. 1998. "The Jeffersonian Myth in Supreme Court Sedition Jurisprudence." Washington University Law Quarterly 76 (summer).
Gibson, Michael T. 1986. "The Supreme Court and Freedom of Expression from 1791 to 1917." Fordham Law Review 55 (December).
Grinstein, Joseph. 1996. "Jihad and the Constitution: The First Amendment Implications of Combating Religiously Motivated Terrorism." Yale Law Journal 105 (March).
Levinson, Nan. 2003. Outspoken: Free Speech Stories. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Weintraub, Leonard. 1987. "Crime of the Century: Use of the Mail Fraud Statute Against Authors." Boston University Law Review 67 (May).

Cross-references 

CITE..

Cold War; Communism; Freedom of Speech; Socialism.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.