If not Congress, Obama should reject bill on concealed-weapon permits

[What part don't y'all get?]
oped: listen up LA Times... Kawlifornia et al...we the people of most states within the union are fed up with Kawlifornia, NY,Ma, and Il dictating to the remaining 46 states on how to think,regulate and live our lives under the Constitution/Bill of Rights. First and foremost I was born and raised in California and my families heritage in California dates back to the 1840's under the Spanish land grants...related to General Castro on dads moms side who was the Spanish Governor of California during this period in time and seceded California to Captain Fremont without a fight...water under the bridge. 
California was a great state while I was growing up..the 1950-1960's then low and behold carpet baggers' from NY,Ma,and Il started moving in and started taking over the politics of the state...now Kawlifornia is bankrupt morally as well as fiscally under the perversion of progressive politics [CPUSA]...Just a fact Jack!   

We the people are sick and tired of your Sodom and Gomorrah mentality,amnesty for illegal aliens,royal welfare for all, attacks on the Constitution/Bill of Rights,over regulation,high taxes and piss poor service to your residents and guests. 
I saw the writing on the wall way back in 1994 and bailed from my former beloved state...moved to Northern Nevada (Conservative)...Southern Nevada (Liberal) now being taken over by California,NY,Ma and Il progressives and has become Kawlifornias smoking zone, re population and takeover to corrupt Nevada as well! 

Y'all don't play well with other states you want other states to recognize your perverted local laws,regulations and licenses but refuse to recognize other states if they don't agree with your interpretation of the Constitution/Bill of Rights
How about if we the 'other' states stop recognizing Kawlifornia,Ma,Ny and Il drivers licenses,rules, laws and regulations as they are now being issued to illegal aliens ! Enough said for now as y'all make me sick! 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A bill in Congress would require states to honor concealed weapons permits issued in other states. Above, a California Department of Justice official holds a confiscated handgun. (Daniel Karmann / EPA)

By The Times Editorial Board contact the reporter 

California has some of the nation's toughest gun-control laws, but proposed legislation in Congress would force the state to let people with concealed-weapon permits issued elsewhere carry their guns here. The Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2015 would be bad law and bad policy, and if it passes — which it very well could — President Obama ought to add it to his growing list of bills to veto.

Gun lobby misfires again with guns-on-campus proposal

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), one of the bill's main backers, compares a concealed-carry permit to a driver's license. “If you have a driver's license in Texas, you can drive in New York, in Utah and other places, subject to the laws of those states,” Cornyn said. Why, he asks, shouldn't the same be true for guns?
But that's an inapt comparison. Guns have a unique and troubling place in American society, and the rules that govern them differ significantly from state to state.
Variations of the reciprocity act have cropped up in previous legislative sessions as part of a push by the gun lobby and its supporters to loosen what few sensible restrictions exist in the country. This latest proposal would force states with higher hurdles for issuing concealed-carry permits to recognize permits issued by states with lower requirements, a move that critics argue is a “race to the bottom.” Apparently, states' rights is one of those principles that conservatives are all for — but only when it suits their purposes.

Federal gun-control laws are a good idea, in our view. But states, which have a responsibility to maintain public safety, also should be able to set their own, tougher standards without worrying that they'll be undermined by those of a more permissive neighbor. California, for instance, requires people to pass a gun safety course to qualify for a concealed-weapon permit; South Dakota does not.
Do we really want politicians in South Dakota, Texas or South Carolina determining the rules on who may carry a concealed weapon here? Clearly, what might be a sensible gun law in rural Nevada would not necessarily be sensible in California, with it's urbanized areas and its urban problems.

Previous incarnations of this bill easily cleared the House but stalled in the Democratic-controlled Senate. With Republicans now in control of both chambers, and with some rural-state Democratic senators backing the bill, it has a much better chance of reaching the president's desk. If Congress does the gun lobby's bidding and approves this, the president not only should veto it, but should help wrangle fellow Democrats in Congress to ensure the veto is not overridden.