by
Gary DeMar
A meme is going around by a number of people claiming that the Second
Amendment — “the right to bear arms” — was put in the Constitution to
protect slavery. The following is from actor Danny Glover who spoke to a
group of students at a Texas A&M University:
“‘I don’t know if you know the genesis of
the right to bear arms,’ he said. ‘The Second Amendment comes from the
right to protect themselves from slave revolts, and from uprisings by
Native Americans.
“‘A revolt from people who were stolen
from their land or revolt from people whose land was stolen from, that’s
what the genesis of the second amendment is,’ he continued.
If this is true, then it’s obvious that gun ownership was for
protection against what people believed was a threat. If there were
fears of Indian uprisings and slave revolts, then you would think that
Glover would be lobbying for the right of the people to keep and bear
arms rather than for the government to restrict gun ownership. Blacks
are as much victims of crimes as are whites. Why should they be left
defenseless? It doesn’t matter what the perceived threat is.
That threat today consists of marauding thugs and a potentially
power-grabbing and rights-denying federal government that one day might
use unrestricted force to impose its agenda on the American people.
Unfortunately for Glover and other mythstorians, the history of the
Second Amendment is not rooted in the slave trade. It’s rooted in the
threat of political tyranny going back centuries.
“The right to have arms in English
history is believed to have been regarded as a long-established natural
right in English law, auxiliary to the natural and legally defensible
rights to life.”
The 1689 English Bill of Rights included a provision that there would
be “no royal interference in the freedom of the people to have arms for
their own defence.” Under James II, Protestants were denied the right
to bear arms. The 1689 Bill of Rights stated: “Subjects which are
Protestants may have Arms for their Defence.
Debates and laws over bearing arms have a long history in England for
some of the same reasons we are debating the topic today. The great
English jurist William Blackstone (1723–1780) wrote:
“In these several articles consist the rights, or, as they are
frequently termed, the liberties of Englishmen. . . To preserve these
from violation, it is necessary that the constitution of parliaments be
supported in it’s full vigor; and limits certainly known, be set to the
royal prerogative. And, lastly, to vindicate these rights, when actually
violated or attacked, the subjects of England are entitled, in the
first place, to the regular administration and free course of justice in
the courts of law; next to the right of petitioning the king and
parliament for
redress of grievances; and
lastly to the right of having and using arms for self-preservation and defence.
And all these rights and liberties it is our birthright to enjoy
entire; unless where the laws of our country have laid them under
necessary restraints. Restraints in themselves so gentle and moderate,
as will appear upon farther enquiry, that no man of sense or probity
would wish to see them slackened.”
You can see echoes of our own Constitution in these words. For
example, in addition to the right to bear arms, the First Amendment uses
the phrase “redress of grievances.” These were viewed as “liberties of
Englishmen” that were their “birthright to enjoy.”
Notice that nothing is said about slavery.
Danny Glover and other mythstorians on the Second Amendment should read Stephen P. Halbrook’s
That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right:
“Halbrook traces the right to bear arms
from ancient Greece and Rome to the English republicans, then to the
American Revolution and Constitution, through the Reconstruction period
extending the right to African Americans, and onward to today’s
controversies.”
Also see Halbrook’s
The Founders and the Second Amendment: The Origins of the Right to Bear Arms
that’s “the first book-length account of the origins of the Second
Amendment, based on the Founders’ own statements as found in newspapers”
from 1768 to 1826.
It didn’t take me long to find these facts. They are available to anyone
who wants to take the time to do the research. Glover knows that he’s
appealing to low-information voters.
No comments:
Post a Comment