The following was written in response to Bob Unruh’s recent WND
article (“Democrat Demands Eligibility Hearing Now”) on the petition by
Attorney Larry Klayman on behalf of Democrat Plaintiff Michael C. Voeltz
for determination by the court as to the eligibility of Democrat
candidate Barack Obama.
Think of the absurdity of all of the endless debating and legal
maneuvering (on the part of the judges and the Obama defense team) when
all that is needed, and all that has been needed from the beginning of
this insulting charade, is for a judge to simply require the obvious –
that his “original” birth certificate be examined. Is there a sentient
being on the planet who would not admit that this would end the
so-called “side show” once and for all? No, of course there isn’t…not an
honest one (or one who registers brain-wave activity), at least.
Instead, even if a judge were to order this, Jill Nagamine, the
Hawaii Deputy Attorney General whose husband is somehow closely tied to
Obama, would twist the law – as she already has on numerous occasions –
to protest that showing the birth certificate (a “bonafide” copy of
which he has supposedly posted on his official White House website for
all the world to see) would violate HI state law. Even though the very
statute that she has quoted ad infinitum (HRS 338-18: b-9) specifically
allows that a “court of competent jurisdiction” can order examination of
such a document.
In addition, according to the same statute (HRS 338-18: g-4): “A
private or government attorney who seeks to confirm information about a
vital event relating to any such record which was acquired during the
course of or for purposes of legal proceedings” can request “a
verification in lieu of a certified copy” of the validity of specified
facts from the record. In other words, Mr. Klayman himself could by this
very statue request that the State of Hawaii verify that the virtual
birth certificate posted at whitehouse.gov is an exact replica of the
original birth certificate in their vault. (AZ Secretary of State Ken
Bennett asked for this to be verified, and HI State Registrar, Alvin
Onaka, did not verify that it was, but in a carefully crafted response
said only that “the information” on the document posted at
whitehouse.gov “matched” the record in their files. Attorney Klayman
could, in fact, demand that the precise question be answered – unlike
Mr. Bennett, who was only pretending to comply with the request of this
author and others and therefore did not press the matter – shamelessly
accepting a deliberate non-answer as sufficient when it clearly was
not.)
Once again, is there anyone who would pretend that if Mr. Obama
actually had a legitimate birth certificate he wouldn’t have simply
turned it over (or allowed a forensic examination thereof)? No, once
again there is not…but the sovereign People of this country are expected
(told, by Republicans no less) to simply sit back and mindlessly accept
that he has nothing to hide!
Read More:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment