I have decided to address the issue of Gay Marriage and Homosexuality..it can be traced back to the Roman and Greek Empires..and as we all are aware both Empires failed the test of time..!
Homosexuality/Pedophilia was common practice and accepted within Hitlers elite SS also... hello do we want this to begin again?
Plato wrote that same-sex lovers were more blessed than ordinary mortals. But then he changed his mind, describing the act as 'utterly unholy' and 'the ugliest of ugly things'.
Concerning Roman homosexuality, Bruce W. Frier in a 1999 book review for Bryn Mawr Classical Review wrote:
Nathaniel Blake wrote concerning Roman homosexuality:
Homosexuality/Pedophilia was common practice and accepted within Hitlers elite SS also... hello do we want this to begin again?
Plato wrote that same-sex lovers were more blessed than ordinary mortals. But then he changed his mind, describing the act as 'utterly unholy' and 'the ugliest of ugly things'.
Concerning Roman homosexuality, Bruce W. Frier in a 1999 book review for Bryn Mawr Classical Review wrote:
| “ | In Rome of the early Empire, there were many men who threw off the conventions of traditional Roman manhood and instead assumed an "effeminate" appearance and manner, thereby, in the usual case, advertising their eagerness for sexual encounters with other males. These were the "softies" (molles), the cinaedi. Their numbers cannot even be guessed, but, in a city of a million persons, they might easily have numbered in the tens of thousands; Juvenal saw them flocking into Rome on every available transport (9.130-133)....The Apostle Paul...adduces overt homosexual behavior as his chief example of the capital's decadence (Romans 1.26-27).[1] | ” |
| “ | The Roman Empire has
often been portrayed as possessing a moral tolerance of homosexuality,
and there is some truth in this. But, the Roman conception of same-sex relationships was very different than that of the modern West. The most important factors in the Roman view seem to have been the status and role of the partners.
The Romans did not consider homosexual or heterosexual identities as exclusive from one another. While bisexuality was common, strict homosexuality was all but unknown.
Unlike the modern view, social class mattered a great deal in the acceptability of homosexual relations. The upper classes were much more likely to indulge in homosexual acts, and masters had the sexual use of their slaves. But homosexual relations between freeborn Romans were regarded as disgraceful.... There was no equality between the sexes in regard to homosexual acts. While subject to certain strictures, male homosexuality was tolerated in many cases. Lesbianism, however, was much less common and seems to have been universally considered as reprehensible. Finally, many of the differences between the imperial Roman view of homosexuality and the modern perception of it can be traced to the rise of Christianity. Christian views shaped the West for almost two millennia, suffusing the perspectives even of those who now reject its sexual morals.... Today, little to no distinction is made between partners or the sex of homosexual couples. Many of these differences can be traced to the influence of Christian views on Western culture. In addition, Nathaniel Blake states that in Roman homosexuality the "preservation of a man’s masculinity" was predicated upon his taking the masculine role in every sexual encounter and that "the slur was to have taken on the woman’s role in such acts." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Being of the Christian belief it is written that homosexuality is a abomination in the eyes of God (Plato also)...now one either believes in the writings or not...it was also written in the Holy Book to not add to nor take away from the writings...! So now let's look at the scientific approach to homosexuality...there is no magic bullet called a 'gene' that would add credence to the 'Gay Mafia' claim that one is born that way..the only exception would be the rare case of being born a 'hermaphrodite'~having both sexual parts~this would be the only true definition of being a 'born' homosexual!...on the contrary one is born male or female...even if one does not want to accept the Christian belief one must consider Natures Plan...males were given the parts to enter the female womb for the act of procreation...now one can argue that 'God' or 'Mother Nature' created the 'pleasure' so this act would take place. Since there is absolutely no scientific proof that one is 'Born' homosexual...the only logical conclusion is the behavior is learned...one could also come to the conclusion that it is nothing more nor nothing less than sexual immaturity/ultimate masturbation and or a simple fetish...no different than shoe,golden showers,foot,S&M or any other weird fetish...none of which is worthy of the act of marriage So for the looney left and the Gay Mafia to rant /rave accuse and call those who disagree with their immature lifestyle as being haters and or bigots...just shows how immature they really are, which leads to the conclusion of resting ones case against all this nonsense...Most people could care less what consenting adults do in private...but to take it to the level of being natural and normal behavior worthy of marriage rights takes it beyond the pale! Hate me if you want..I just call em' like I see em'! I don't hate Homosexuals nor would I ever be mean to them...I just disagree with their trying to force their private habits on others! | ” |
No comments:
Post a Comment