Pages

Saturday, February 21, 2015

SHOULD KING BARACK BE ABLE TO BLOW OFF COURT DECISIONS AGAINST HIM: Guess What Women, Black & Young Voters Said

Screen Shot 2015-02-21 at 8.33.54 AM
oped: Well this certainly proves the point that the *Progressive* democrat party is in fact the CPUSA...hell bent on transforming the United States into a communist state...folks if this in not treason I have no idea what treason is! What needs to be done at this time is for the old guard blue dog democrats to unite with the GOP and conservative independents in the house and senate and vote on bills which make Obama irrelevant with a veto proof margine...then write a bill making the CPUSA as well as the ACLU/SPLC enemies of the state and prosecute for sedition/treason! Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is should then be Impeached for sedition/treason arrested and prosecuted for crimes against the state . 

Contrary to the basic principles of checks and balances in our government, more than a quarter of likely U.S. voters think that Obama should be able to override federal court rulings. This is good news for King Obama.
More than one-quarter of likely U.S. voters think President Obama should ignore federal court rulings “if they are standing in the way of actions he feels are important for the country,” according to Rasmussen Reports polling data released Friday.
An even bigger segment of Americans polled — 31 percent — said they believe Obama should take action overriding Congress on “important” issues and that it’s more important that American government operate “efficiently” than it is to preserve America’s checks and balances.

There was a distinct partisan split among the 800 likely voters polled.
On the issue of Obama ignoring court orders, 81 percent of Republicans and 67 percent of unaffiliated voters said the president should not be able to disregard inconvenient court cases, but among Democrats, 43 percent said Obama should be able to brush aside judges’ decisions that don’t go his way.
Read more: The Blaze

No comments:

Post a Comment