Speaker John Boehner isn't ready to let the dream die.
On Tuesday, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell told reporters immigration is just not in the cards in 2014. Last Thursday, rank-and-file House members sent a loud message at that President Obama is not the partner for legislation, spooking even top proponent Paul Ryan.
The editors from National Review, Weekly Standard, and numerous other top conservative pundits have urged the Ohio Republican to cut it out.
However, since the GOP retreat last week, Boehner has just kept marching along.
“I think leadership's focus and my focus
is to get [immigration] done as early as possible,” said Rep. Jeff
Denham of California, who Boehner recently met with on the issue.
“It's part of our conference agenda right
now. It doesn't go on the agenda without scheduling bills and
scheduling time on the floor,” Denham added.
“Clearly, the draft principles we
outlined, members seemed to be supportive of them,” Boehner said at a
press conference Tuesday morning in response to a question from
Breitbart News, adding, “no decisions have been made” on whether to move
forward.
“I wouldn't be surprised” if immigration
legislation came to the House floor as early as this spring, one
well-connected GOP member said.
Boehner's office has released several
documents touting the GOP principles since the retreat, some of which
include almost cartoonish defenses of a proposal.
The “principles” would “eliminate the ability for any administration to arbitrarily decide which laws to enforce,” a Q&A posted on Boehner's website says.
Meanwhile, top amnesty proponents outside
Congress say they were relatively pleased with the principles and how
they were received by the GOP.
"What has surprised me is how few people
in House Republican caucus have stood up and opposed the policy," said
Frank Sharry, founder and executive director of America's Voice and one
of the nation's leading proponents for immigration reform. "Now maybe
the concern about timing, and Obama's trustworthiness are excuses, ways
to get to 'no' without seeming to be in league with the hardliners. For
us, watching it from our somewhat distant perspective, it's the dog that
didn't bark," he continued.
"This is the party that voted against the
DREAM Act in Dec. 2010. Republicans backed Mitt Romney and his call for
self-deportation in 2012," Sharry added. "And now in early 2014 the
House Republicans are saying citizenship for DREAMers and legal status
with no special path for the rest. That's a pretty significant shift, it
seems to me."
In the House, immigration is still going to be a tough slog, no matter what Boehner wants.
For example, the push back from conservatives has caused significant tremors of doubt within Boehner's leadership team.
GOP Whip Kevin McCarthy, who on a
personal level strongly supports moving forward on the issue, is feeling
the heat back home, Republicans familiar with the matter say. The
California Republican represents a highly conservative district with a
lot of anti-amnesty sentiment. But it also has a significant percentage
of Hispanics and pro-immigration bill activists have staged sit-ins in
McCarthy's district offices.
Majority Leader Eric Cantor has put major
effort into a GOP version of the DREAM Act, which grants amnesty to the
children of illegal immigrants. But he is also keeping an eye on his
right flank in the event Boehner retires at the end of this Congress,
leaving the seat open for Cantor to claim.
Responding to Denham's claim that floor
time has already been scheduled for immigration bills, Cantor spokesman
Rory Cooper said, “There has been nothing scheduled as of now.”
Ryan, meanwhile, confirmed Tuesday that
he had met secretly with top Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer on immigration
but dismissed the importance of the session, which he said occurred last
year.
After raising serious doubts about whether immigration could come to the floor this year in a Sunday television interview, Ryan was more optimistic in remarks to reporters Tuesday.
“It wasn't really bad,” Ryan said about
the immigration showdown in Cambridge, MD. “The substance of our
document people really appreciated. It's just, like I said, the
lawlessness of the White House makes us lose confidence that the
President will enforce the laws,” Ryan said.
What took place in the meeting has emerged as a point of debate among Republicans.
GOP sources who participated in the
meeting – both those who support moving on the issue and those who don't
– said in the hours afterwards that about 80 percent of the lawmakers
who spoke were against bringing a bill forward this year.
“I would say that's ridiculous,” Denham said Tuesday about their accounts.
The issue is complicated because some of
the lawmakers who spoke in favor of the substance of the principles were
not in favor of moving forward on legislation. In many cases, members
only implied their stance on the underlying question rather than
explicitly stating it. They also mostly only had one minute to speak
each.
Still, conservative heavyweights like
Reps. Tom Price and Jeb Hensarling came out strongly against moving
forward, and the result of the meeting seemed to change Ryan's tone in
the days afterward.
One conservative lawmaker who said the
meeting was deeply lopsided against bringing forward legislation in 2014
warned Boehner: “I think he is out for a walk with nobody tagging
along.”
“At this point I don't anticipate
legislation will come to the floor,” said Rep. Tom Cotton, a freshman
member running for Senate in Arkansas.
A top immigration proponent from the
upper chamber, meanwhile, pitched a new argument for why Republicans can
trust Obama to enforce any immigration bills they send him.
"80 percent of Americans, if not 90, want
to secure the border. So, lets say that for some reason the Obama
administration backed away from what Congress mandated – fellow
Democrats would get killed," said Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina
Republican up for reelection this fall. "He's not running again, other
people are. This scenario that he could just unilaterally back away from
border enforcement and politically that not be damning to the
Democratic party… the reason I know that we could move forward with
securing the border is the Democratic party would get killed if they
didn't,” Graham said.
Senator Marco Rubio, another Gang of Eight member, was more pessimistic.
Asked if the House should move forward in 2014, Rubio said, “That's not
my role to give them advice on. They're working on what is a very
difficult issue. The resistance they're running into is a lack of
confidence that this president and the federal government will enforce
the security measures no matter what they're written as.”
No comments:
Post a Comment