By
Wagging The Dog (media, citizens) Operation Confirmed
By CPT Pamela Barnett, USA Retired* (Author Obama Never Vetted:The Unlawful President) Copyright 2012
Obama lied to every American and the rest of the world about the date of the alleged Osama Bin Laden killing, according to recently released Department of Defense emails. (Email redactions by DOD) According to a live speech (White House link and alternate link) given to the country late night on May 1, 2011, Obama stated “Today at my direction the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound (where Osama allegedly was) in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a fire fight they killed Osama Bin Laden and took custody of his body.”
The emails in my possession received directly from the Department of Defense as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request for Osama Bin Laden’s killing and burial related documents, reveal that the mission to allegedly “kill Osama” occurred April 28, 2011 or earlier, not May 1, 2011, as Obama claimed.
In one of the emails with a date time of April 29, 2011, 4:58 AM, Rear
Admiral (Lower Half) Samuel Perez asks an unidentified email sender
(Redacted) regarding the “burial”: “Do I need any special
religious/ceremonial preparations?” Email strings that were released
concerning the alleged burial of Osama go back to April 28. This means
that “Osama” (or possibly someone else) was killed April 28, 2011 or
earlier.
Obama continued to lie to the American people two other times in his speech that Osama was killed that day – May 1, 2011.
At 6.13 minutes, Obama stated “Tonight I called President Zardari and
my team has also spoken with their Pakistani counterparts. They agree
that this is a good and historic day for both of our nations,” stated
Obama.
At 8.37 “Today’s achievement is a testament to the greatness of our country,” stated Obama.
So why did Obama lie about the date that Osama was killed? Was it timed to further control the media by giving them a new, sexier story than a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals hearing the next morning in Pasadena, CA, that confirmed that Obama’s real, unforged Constitutional credentials had/have NEVER been vetted by any court or anyone in any State or Federal government agency? The court eventually ruled that no one had standing after the 2008 election, except possibly a candidate; and Ambassador Allen Keyes was not running for President again, so the case was dismissed. This video is very important in understanding how the federal courts continue to fraudulently weasel out of hearing Obama ineligibility cases and how the federal courts have taken away our right to petition the federal court regarding unconstitutional issues.
For the first time, the major news networks were going to cover an actual court hearing on Obama’s ineligibility and fraud crimes the very next morning. Obama and his operatives saw this coming and wanted to further keep the American people and the media in the dark regarding his ineligibility, forged documents, and use of a Connecticut social security number never assigned to him. (See related story Was “Osama Killing” Obama Wagging The Dog?)
Surprisingly, or not surprisingly, Rear Admiral (Lower Half) Samuel Perez and other high level military and other government officials let the lie on Osama’s alleged day of death stand. What else is being lied about by Obama and military officials regarding the alleged death of Osama Bin Laden?
On a boat of over 6,000 sailors, only a handful of witnesses? Where were all of the on-duty sailors?
Did those unnamed men in leadership even look in the body bag? Anything or anyone could have been in the bag.
Also,
the Department of Defense, in their Freedom of Information Act
response, stated that the USS Carl Vinson (the carrier in which Osama’s
body was allegedly dumped) had no documentary evidence of Osama’s
burial. However, in the released emails RDML Charles M. Gaouette
stated: “The paucity of documentary evidence in our possession is a
reflection of the emphasis placed upon operational security during the
execution of this phase of the operation.”
Paucity means a small amount. So the military leadership in coordination with Obama’s DOD stated that there is no documentary evidence (a lie), even though RDML Gaouette had said there was a “paucity” of evidence.
Was Rear Admiral (lower half) Charles Gaouette relieved from command because he did not like that the U.S. military and Obama were lying to the American people? Was the admiral being set up by the Obama administration for not wanting to keep the Osama lie quiet? From mynorthwest.com.
Navy Admiral kicked off his ship, sent back to Bremerton. Why?
A man who climbed the Navy’s ranks over a long career has been unceremoniously removed as commander of the USS Stennis Carrier Strike Group and sent back to the homeport in Bremerton.
A U.S. Navy spokesperson is not giving an explanation for the change, other than to say that questions had arisen about Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette’s “leadership judgment.” …….
……..NBC News interviewed Neal Zerbe, a retired Navy Captain, who says, “The particular commander being relieved, and you know translating that to just moving him back to a continental U.S. base while the investigation continues, is unlike anything I’ve ever seen before.”
If you plan on going to see the new Osama killing movie Zero Dark Thirty this weekend, citizens of this country and the world should consider taking the movie more as a work of fiction to prop up Obama than a work of non-fiction. The Obama administration’s lies continue.
*Use of military rank is NOT an endorsement by the Department of Defense or Department of the Army.
Wagging The Dog (media, citizens) Operation Confirmed
By CPT Pamela Barnett, USA Retired* (Author Obama Never Vetted:The Unlawful President) Copyright 2012
Obama lied to every American and the rest of the world about the date of the alleged Osama Bin Laden killing, according to recently released Department of Defense emails. (Email redactions by DOD) According to a live speech (White House link and alternate link) given to the country late night on May 1, 2011, Obama stated “Today at my direction the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound (where Osama allegedly was) in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a fire fight they killed Osama Bin Laden and took custody of his body.”
The emails in my possession received directly from the Department of Defense as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request for Osama Bin Laden’s killing and burial related documents, reveal that the mission to allegedly “kill Osama” occurred April 28, 2011 or earlier, not May 1, 2011, as Obama claimed.
In one of the emails with a date time of April 29, 2011, 4:58 AM, Rear
Admiral (Lower Half) Samuel Perez asks an unidentified email sender
(Redacted) regarding the “burial”: “Do I need any special
religious/ceremonial preparations?” Email strings that were released
concerning the alleged burial of Osama go back to April 28. This means
that “Osama” (or possibly someone else) was killed April 28, 2011 or
earlier.
Email From Rear Admiral Kurt Tidd Morning Of April 28 to RDML Perez Regarding BurialWith Daily Update (27 APR 2011) Subject Header
Obama continued to lie to the American people two other times in his speech that Osama was killed that day – May 1, 2011.
At 8.37 “Today’s achievement is a testament to the greatness of our country,” stated Obama.
So why did Obama lie about the date that Osama was killed? Was it timed to further control the media by giving them a new, sexier story than a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals hearing the next morning in Pasadena, CA, that confirmed that Obama’s real, unforged Constitutional credentials had/have NEVER been vetted by any court or anyone in any State or Federal government agency? The court eventually ruled that no one had standing after the 2008 election, except possibly a candidate; and Ambassador Allen Keyes was not running for President again, so the case was dismissed. This video is very important in understanding how the federal courts continue to fraudulently weasel out of hearing Obama ineligibility cases and how the federal courts have taken away our right to petition the federal court regarding unconstitutional issues.
For the first time, the major news networks were going to cover an actual court hearing on Obama’s ineligibility and fraud crimes the very next morning. Obama and his operatives saw this coming and wanted to further keep the American people and the media in the dark regarding his ineligibility, forged documents, and use of a Connecticut social security number never assigned to him. (See related story Was “Osama Killing” Obama Wagging The Dog?)
Surprisingly, or not surprisingly, Rear Admiral (Lower Half) Samuel Perez and other high level military and other government officials let the lie on Osama’s alleged day of death stand. What else is being lied about by Obama and military officials regarding the alleged death of Osama Bin Laden?
On a boat of over 6,000 sailors, only a handful of witnesses? Where were all of the on-duty sailors?
Did those unnamed men in leadership even look in the body bag? Anything or anyone could have been in the bag.
Also,
the Department of Defense, in their Freedom of Information Act
response, stated that the USS Carl Vinson (the carrier in which Osama’s
body was allegedly dumped) had no documentary evidence of Osama’s
burial. However, in the released emails RDML Charles M. Gaouette
stated: “The paucity of documentary evidence in our possession is a
reflection of the emphasis placed upon operational security during the
execution of this phase of the operation.”Paucity means a small amount. So the military leadership in coordination with Obama’s DOD stated that there is no documentary evidence (a lie), even though RDML Gaouette had said there was a “paucity” of evidence.
Email Where RDML Gaouette Stated That Documentary Evidence of “Osama’s Burial” Existed
Was Rear Admiral (lower half) Charles Gaouette relieved from command because he did not like that the U.S. military and Obama were lying to the American people? Was the admiral being set up by the Obama administration for not wanting to keep the Osama lie quiet? From mynorthwest.com.
Navy Admiral kicked off his ship, sent back to Bremerton. Why?
A man who climbed the Navy’s ranks over a long career has been unceremoniously removed as commander of the USS Stennis Carrier Strike Group and sent back to the homeport in Bremerton.
A U.S. Navy spokesperson is not giving an explanation for the change, other than to say that questions had arisen about Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette’s “leadership judgment.” …….
……..NBC News interviewed Neal Zerbe, a retired Navy Captain, who says, “The particular commander being relieved, and you know translating that to just moving him back to a continental U.S. base while the investigation continues, is unlike anything I’ve ever seen before.”
If you plan on going to see the new Osama killing movie Zero Dark Thirty this weekend, citizens of this country and the world should consider taking the movie more as a work of fiction to prop up Obama than a work of non-fiction. The Obama administration’s lies continue.
*Use of military rank is NOT an endorsement by the Department of Defense or Department of the Army.
No comments:
Post a Comment