By
1. One the part of an officer of the court;The ruling states there are “at least two instances of conduct by defendant’s counsel that, in the court’s view, provide indication that fraud on the court has occurred here.”
2. That is directed to the ‘judicial machinery’ itself;
3. That is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth;
4. That is positive averment or is concealment when one is under a duty to disclose;
5. That deceives the court.
FOX News reported additional details:
Allegra’s
ruling also documents other alleged wrongdoing. When Tom Atteberry, new
ATF Agent in Charge of the Phoenix office, tried to reopen Dobyns’
arson case, Justice Department attorney Valerie Baker told him not to
because it would damage her defense against Dobyns. Atteberry was a
witnesses in the case, but the judge didn’t hear about the DOJ effort to
silence him until trial. Allegra ruled that the DOJ action may amount
to ‘fraud upon the court.”
“It’s very,
very serious,” said Dupree. “Judges don’t make allegations like this
cavalierly. It’s only after they have looked at the evidence and they
have deep concerns that something that is not quite right. This is not
by any means a run-of-the-mill, routine order.”
Last summer, Judge Allegra awarded Dobyns $173,000 in damages and rebuked the ATF for
failing to adequately protect Dobyns and his family. The Justice
Department appealed that ruling, but in another highly unusual move,
Allegra successfully had the case remanded to his court, so he can
pursue the seven government lawyers for concealing evidence. Recently
unsealed documents obtained by FoxNews.com show that the DOJ disagrees with Allegra’s decision to keep the lawyers out of his court.
Judge Allegra wrote that, “The record indicates that there is much more
involved here than a simple misstatement of fact, a fraudulent filing,
or a failure to advise the court of a critical fact. Rather, it appears
that there is significant evidence that defendant’s conduct may actually
have subverted the judicial process…”
Eric Holder, the head of the Obama DOJ, is the first sitting attorney general in U.S. history to be held in contempt of Congress, receiving the rebuke in bi-partisan fashion for his lies in the Fast and Furious Obama gun-running scheme to Mexican warlords.
Eric Holder, the head of the Obama DOJ, is the first sitting attorney general in U.S. history to be held in contempt of Congress, receiving the rebuke in bi-partisan fashion for his lies in the Fast and Furious Obama gun-running scheme to Mexican warlords.
No comments:
Post a Comment