Benghazi Hero Drops Jaws, Reveals What Comey and McCabe’s FBI Did to Him

by:Ben Marquis
When it was announced Friday evening that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe had been fired on the recommendation of both the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General and the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility, there were plenty of “hot takes” from politicians and media figures on both the right and left.
However, according to BizPac Review, the hottest take of all in regard to McCabe’s termination may have come from one of the heroes who emerged from the deadly 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack, Kris “Tanto” Paronto.

WARNING: The following tweet contains profane language that some readers may find offensive. 

Paronto, a former U.S. Army Ranger who was a security contractor in Benghazi at the time of the attack and helped fend off repeated waves of assaults by terrorists at the U.S. consulate and nearby CIA annex, took to Twitter to make his feelings known in regard to McCabe, as well as former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan.
He began with a tweet which eviscerated McCabe’s rebuttal claiming he had been “singled out” in an effort to “slander” him and the FBI in general by President Donald Trump and his administration.

Paronto tweeted, “Slander the FBI and Law Enforcement?! You’ve got to be s—-ing me Andy. You, James and your @BarackObama appointed syndicate brought nothing but lies, politics, corruption & disgrace to a once great FBI. @Comey #AndrewMcCabe #LockThemUp.”

Kris Paronto @KrisParonto

Slander the @FBI and Law Enforcement?! You’ve got to be shitting me Andy. You , James and your @BarackObama appointed syndicate brought nothing but lies, politics, corruption&disgrace to a once great FBI. @Comey #AndrewMcCabe #LockThemUp

1:51 PM - Mar 17, 2018

• 3,435
• 1,733 people are talking about this  
•  
•  

But it was the tweet he sent immediately following that which really garnered attention, as he appeared to indicate that partisan members of the FBI attempted to slap him and the other team members from Benghazi with excessive use of force charges, presumably in relation to their use of deadly force to defend the consulate and CIA annex from repeated attacks. 

Kris Paronto @KrisParonto

By the way, as you’re on your way out I want to thank you, James and your @HillaryClinton supporting hacks at the @FBI for trying to pin excessive force use on myself and my team after coming home from Benghazi. You all are the worst scum of human. @Comey #SorryNotSorry

1:52 PM - Mar 17, 2018

• 15.4K
• 8,991 people are talking about this

 “By the way, as you’re on your way out I want to thank you, James and your @HillaryClinton supporting hacks at the @FBI for trying to pin excessive force use on myself and my team after coming home from Benghazi. You all are the worst scum of human. @Comey #SorryNotSorry,” the Benghazi hero tweeted. 

That astonishing assertion — that he and other Benghazi heroes were targeted for legal reprisal by partisan hacks at the FBI — cannot be independently verified at this time. But it will be interesting to see if any further information in regard to this claim is shared by Paronto or one of his teammates, or perhaps even the upcoming DOJ-OIG report which has been looking into allegations of FBI misconduct. That astonishing assertion — that he and other Benghazi heroes were targeted for legal reprisal by partisan hacks at the FBI — cannot be independently verified at this time. But it will be interesting to see if any further information in regard to this claim is shared by Paronto or one of his teammates, or perhaps even the upcoming DOJ-OIG report which has been looking into allegations of FBI misconduct. 

“By the way, as you’re on your way out I want to thank you, James and your @HillaryClinton supporting hacks at the @FBI for trying to pin excessive force use on myself and my team after coming home from Benghazi. You all are the worst scum of human. @Comey #SorryNotSorry,” the Benghazi hero tweeted.
That astonishing assertion — that he and other Benghazi heroes were targeted for legal reprisal by partisan hacks at the FBI — cannot be independently verified at this time. But it will be interesting to see if any further information in regard to this claim is shared by Paronto or one of his teammates, or perhaps even the upcoming DOJ-OIG report which has been looking into allegations of FBI misconduct.

But Paronto wasn’t quite done yet, as he then set his sights on Comey. He posted a tweet in response to the veiled threat issued to Trump by the former director that Comey’s own version of events would be heard by the American people “very soon” — as in, as soon as his lucrative and profitable book tour kicks off.

Kris Paronto @KrisParonto

Still beating your “honorable” drum James?? .Yea, because your words hold so much truth after lying continually&protecting the criminal @HillaryClinton . Say what you want, I won’t believe a word of it. You have zero integrity which you earned. @Comey #believeyourownBS https://twitter.com/comey/status/975065073575219200 …

1:52 PM - Mar 17, 2018

• 3,234
• 1,457 people are talking about this

“Still beating your ‘honorable’ drum James?? Yea, because your words hold so much truth after lying continually & protecting the criminal @HillaryClinton. Say what you want, I won’t believe a word of it. You have zero integrity which you earned. @Comey #believeyourownBS,” Paronto tweeted.
Nor did he let the more open and unhinged threat against Trump from Brennan slide either, as he tweeted a short time later, “Showing your true partisan colors that you took into the @CIA, a govt organization that should be politically neutral. Being nominated by @BarackObama though it should come as no surprise. You put #politicsbeforepatriots.”

Kris Paronto @KrisParonto

Showing your true partisan colors that you took into the @CIA , a govt organization that should be politically neutral. Being nominated by @BarackObama though it should come as no surprise . You put #politicsbeforepatriots https://twitter.com/johnbrennan/status/973534769266003968 …

11:27 PM - Mar 17, 2018

• 2,707
• 1,204 people are talking about this 
•  
• 
  This man knows a thing or two more than the average government bureaucrat about such things as honor, patriotism and service to country, and he isn’t the least bit afraid to let the partisan hacks who have infested the bureaucratic deep state know exactly how he feels about their duplicitous actions.
  Hopefully more information will emerge in the near future to validate and support his claim of being targeted by those same slimy hacks in the aftermath of the Benghazi terror attack, now that a nonpartisan and less vindictive rule of law is being restored.
  
  What do you think of Paronto's claims? Scroll down to comment below!

Why No Questions about Transgender Army Traitor?

by: Cliff Kincaid 


The most glaring omission in Tucker Carlson’s interview of the human oddity known as Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner was the failure to seek comment on the transgender traitor by the name of Bradley/Chelsea Manning. This is the former U.S. Army analyst scheduled for release from prison next month because former President Barack Obama commuted his/her sentence for Russian-style espionage.
Jenner, a former male Olympic champion, is now a spokesman for the “trans community” that includes espionage agent Bradley/Chelsea Manning. So what about Manning? What did Manning’s gender confusion and mental problems have to do with his/her espionage against the United States?
Will Manning get a “courage” award in the same way that Jenner was honored by ESPN for a biological transformation through chemicals and surgery from masculine to feminine?

We understand that the Jenner appearance on Fox News was a cheap publicity stunt, designed by Jenner to sell her new book, and for the cable channel to herald Tucker Carlson’s new show, a replacement for the “O’Reilly Factor” and its fired host, Bill O’Reilly. Still, there was an opportunity for Tucker to ask about one of the major espionage cases of our time. He blew it.
In his recent remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, CIA Director Mike Pompeo described Manning essentially as an agent of Russia through his association with WikiLeaks, which functions on behalf of Russian and other anti-American interests. Pompeo said, “WikiLeaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service. It has encouraged its followers to find jobs at CIA in order to obtain intelligence. It directed Chelsea Manning in her theft of specific secret information. And it overwhelmingly focuses on the United States, while seeking support from anti-democratic countries and organizations.”

Pompeo raises more questions than he answers. How many more insider spies like Manning are there? Are the WikiLeaks followers at the CIA among the agency’s transgender work force? What, if anything, will Pompeo do to purge the questionable hires at the CIA that were made under the reign of Obama CIA director John Brennan, an advocate of “diversity” who laid out a multi-year plan to hire gays and transgenders?
Pompeo’s comments about Manning and the insider spy threat were unusual because he had been asked during his confirmation hearings by Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) about the agency’s gay and transgender employees. “You have my assurance that every employee will be treated in a way that is appropriate and equal,” Pompeo responded.
Of course, the word “appropriate” leaves the door open for dealing with traitors in the CIA in a special manner.

WikiLeaks declared “Victory” after Manning’s sentence was commuted, while former CIA/NSA analyst Edward Snowden said, “Thanks, Obama.” Snowden is a traitor who fled to Russia after disclosing classified information.
So does this mean that Obama is an agent of Russia? In this case, he is clearly serving Russian interests.
At the time of Manning’s commutation, CNN reported that WikiLeaks “is at the center of the storm over alleged Russian hacking of Democratic servers during the election, and Assange is being accused of directly subverting American democracy.”
Here was a case of Obama openly assisting a de facto Russia agent and his pro-Russian handlers. Of course, that’s not the way CNN put it. Instead, Obama had come “under intense pressure from LGBT groups that have been stalwart supporters throughout his political career to show eleventh hour compassion towards Manning,” CNN reported.

So the fact that Obama pleased the LGBT community with his “compassionate” decision makes everything all right and eliminates the need for informed speculation about Obama serving Russian interests.
Carlson should have asked Jenner about Manning’s role as a transgender hero.
Jenner, a rich reality TV star who lives in Malibu, can pay for her fancy clothes, which were on display in the Diane Sawyer special on ABC. She can pay for chemicals and surgeries to complete the “transition” to female.
It’s been different for Manning. Taxpayers have picked up the bill.
During his/her time in prison, according to The New York Times, Manning wears female prison undergarments, including a sports bra, and “subdued cosmetics.” In early 2015, the paper reported, he/she was allowed “to get speech therapy to feminize the tone and pitch of her voice and began cross-sex hormone therapy.”

These perks came about because Manning’s legal team at the ACLU sued for the benefits.
Subsequently, Obama’s Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter announced unilaterally, without Congressional input or approval, that the Pentagon would start paying for transgender surgeries for Armed Services personnel.
The situation is so extreme that West Point hosted a Transgender Day of Remembrance, organized by the Army’s Office of Diversity, Inclusion and Equal Opportunity. Judicial Watch disclosed that Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Amanda Simpson, a former test pilot named Mitchell, spoke at the event, at a cost of $1,099.92.
The Fox News publicity stunt with Caitlyn Jenner could have produced some real news, if only Carlson had asked about the Manning case and others like it. Instead, he permitted Jenner to say that she wished President Donald Trump would go further in his support for LGBT rights.

Carlson called Jenner “the world’s most famous transgender person.” This designation may not last for long.
When Manning gets out of prison in May, can we expect an appearance on “Tucker Carlson Tonight?” If Carlson is struggling to get O’Reilly-type ratings, you can bet on it.

—-

Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org.

Trump Delivers Documented Evidence of Obama Wiretaps To House Panel

by:MIchael DePinto 

At this point in time, the public does not yet know the contents of the documents delivered by President Trump’s DOJ to the House Intelligence Committee regarding the wiretapping incident, but presumably since the documents were sent by Trump’s team, it stands to reason that whatever was delivered to the House Intelligence Committee was in favor of Trump's claims, not the other way around.
Throughout his time in office, Barack Obama associated with many political operatives who were real lowlifes, and who often walked a tightrope between the world of what was considered legal behavior (however, unethical), and what was considered criminal behavior. There’s an old saying I'm sure you're familiar with that goes:

'If you hang around the barbershop long enough, you're going to get a haircut…’
Are we about to learn next week that Obama got a haircut, and we’re all going to find out?
In the video below, Right Wing News breaks down the recent report from Young Conservatives, and compares it with an earlier report from Doug Hagmann of the Canada Free Press. Did Obama finally go to far this time? Let's hope so. It's long overdue!





Young Conservatives Writes:
Last week, the House Intelligence Committee asked the Justice Department to submit any evidence it had pertaining to President Donald Trump’s claims of surveillance by the Obama administration. 
The plot thickens, as on Friday, the DOJ made its submission to the committee.
From The Hill:
The Department of Justice (DOJ) sent documents to the House Intelligence Committee on Friday in response to a request for evidence backing up President Trump’s claim that former President Obama wiretapped Trump Tower. 


The committee is currently reviewing the documents, an aide confirmed to The Hill.
It’s unclear what’s in the documents, which CNN reported separately had also been delivered to the Senate Intelligence Committee, though that report could not be immediately confirmed.
White House spokesperson Sean Spicer clarified Trump’s original wording, saying that when he used the term “wiretapping” in quotation marks in his tweet, he was referring to surveillance in a broader sense. 
Trump also didn’t back off the claim of surveillance, even joking about it with Angela Merkel who was spied on by the Obama administration.
The House Intelligence Committee will hold an open meeting on Monday discussing Russian interference and the claims of Obama administration surveillance.  


MEET TEAM OBAMA WITH THE AMNESIA
While some have disputed the claims of surveillance, if there was no surveillance, how then were Trump’s conversations with the Presidents of Mexico and Australia picked up and the transcripts later leaked specifically to undermine him? 
The media appears to have completely suffered amnesia about those reports.
It will be fascinating to see what evidence, if anything, the DOJ submitted…
Recall the following from a post last Friday titled: Obama Wiretapping Bombshell Drops; This is as Serious as it Gets (Video): 


In that article, Douglas J. Hagmann reported that President Trump had in his possession evidence of the paper trail leading to a FISA court that substantiates his assertions that Obama, obtained authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign under the pretense of a national security investigation. For anyone not familiar with Douglas J. Hagmann, he has been a licensed investigator in the private sector for the last 30 years, where he's worked on well over 5,000 cases, and he's considered a surveillance specialist within his industry.
Often, his vast expertise has been sought out as either an informational or operational asset on various federal and state law enforcement agencies. In addition to his investigating duties, Hagmann is also an author, runs four websites, and has a successful talk radio show. Bottom line: If law enforcement agencies trust Hagmann's investigative abilities, then I'm certainly going to trust them long before I believe a mainstream media that suffers from amnesia about the very stories THEY reported on previously. 


Canada Free Press Reported:
There is a large storm brewing over Washington, DC right now – a storm that could dwarf anything ever seen in recent times. It is growing stronger by the hour as new information is being disclosed that strongly suggests that it is possible, even likely, that Obama and his Department of Justice maliciously and criminally misused the FISA process to collect intelligence on Presidential candidate Donald J. Trump. Additionally, Obama personally relaxed the limitations on how such information collected could be disseminated in the weeks before leaving office.
The political ramifications from this, if proved correct, could be unprecedented in scope. Once fully exposed, it would explain the curious actions of Obama as he prepared to vacate the White House. It would also explain, in context, the actions and statements of not only Barack Hussein Obama, but others in key positions of power including Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, John Brennan, and others within the media.

At issue is Obama’s insistence to secure a federal wiretap warrant of Donald J. Trump, the candidate, using the federal court system as the mechanism to do so. The ostensible probable cause was alleged ties between Donald J. Trump and/or his associates with Russia.
The first warrant application was made in June 2016, according to reports published by The New York Times and elsewhere, but was rejected due to the lack of probable cause of criminal activity.
RECALL THAT THE FIRST ATTEMPT AT THE FISA COURTS…
WAS JUST DAYS AFTER THE INFAMOUS MEETING ON THE TARMAC!  




When the request was denied in regular federal court, Obama and his Justice Department attempted an “end around” by citing the existence of a “foreign actor” and made a similar surveillance warrant application through the more specialized Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court in October of 2016. According to published reports, that warrant application was rejected as well, a rare occurrence in the FISA venue, which strengthens claims that no evidence of any foreign involvement ever existed. It has been reported that the initial warrant application to the FISA court specifically named Donald J. Trump.
It is also relevant to note here that this is the type of activity that led to the creation of the infamous “Wall” that was referenced after the 9/11 attacks. Its relevance to this specific instance is explained well by former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy an article linked here.
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand

Private Detective Claims Trump has Evidence of Paper Trail to Obama Wiretap

by:MIchael DePinto 

What happens when Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama, two of the most corrupt politicians in modern history, join forces with the goal of their unholy alliance being their party’s retention of the most powerful office on earth? You get the potential for what was once “unthinkable,” to become “ordinary.” Nowhere is that more evident, than the “TrumpGate” scandal currently unfolding.
Now, according to Douglas J. Hagmann, President Trump now has evidence of a paper trail leading to a FISA court that substantiates his assertions that Obama, obtained authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign under the pretense of a national security investigation. Douglas J. Hagmann has been a licensed investigator in the private sector for the last 30 years. He’s also an author, has four websites, and a talk radio show host.

As a private detective, Hagmann has worked well over 5,000 cases and is recognized as a surveillance specialist. He has also worked as an informational and operational asset for various federal and state law enforcement agencies.  So, if law enforcement can trust his investigative ability, you might want to do the same before putting your faith in the mainstream media's investigative ability.
In the following video, Right Wing News reviews what is known about the Hagmann bombshell, and how it relates to a bizarre scenario that was predicted back in the mid-1990s by President Clinton’s Department of Injustice, and then recently explained in an article written by National Review's Andrew McCarthy. Right Wing News also points out how everything Hagmann and McCarthy suggest, fits the known timeline of “TrumpGate” like a glove.
Do good things really come to those who wait? 

Canada Free Press Reports:

There is a large storm brewing over Washington, DC right now – a storm that could dwarf anything ever seen in recent times. It is growing stronger by the hour as new information is being disclosed that strongly suggests that it is possible, even likely, that Obama and his Department of Justice maliciously and criminally misused the FISA process to collect intelligence on Presidential candidate Donald J. Trump. Additionally, Obama personally relaxed the limitations on how such information collected could be disseminated in the weeks before leaving office. 

The political ramifications from this, if proved correct, could be unprecedented in scope. Once fully exposed, it would explain the curious actions of Obama as he prepared to vacate the White House. It would also explain, in context, the actions and statements of not only Barack Hussein Obama, but others in key positions of power including Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, John Brennan, and others within the media. 




At issue is Obama’s insistence to secure a federal wiretap warrant of Donald J. Trump, the candidate, using the federal court system as the mechanism to do so. The ostensible probable cause was alleged ties between Donald J. Trump and/or his associates with Russia.
The first warrant application was made in June 2016, according to reports published by The New York Times and elsewhere, but was rejected due to the lack of probable cause of criminal activity.
When the request was denied in regular federal court, Obama and his Justice Department attempted an “end around” by citing the existence of a “foreign actor” and made a similar surveillance warrant application through the more specialized Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court in October of 2016. According to published reports, that warrant application was rejected as well, a rare occurrence in the FISA venue, which strengthens claims that no evidence of any foreign involvement ever existed. It has been reported that the initial warrant application to the FISA court specifically named Donald J. Trump. 


It is also relevant to note here that this is the type of activity that led to the creation of the infamous “Wall” that was referenced after the 9/11 attacks. Its relevance to this specific instance is explained well by former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy in the article below…
Andrew McCarthy writes: 

The idea that FISA could be used against political enemies always seemed far-fetched. Now it might not be.

Remember the great debate over “the Wall” following the 9/11 attacks? “The Wall” was a set of internal guidelines that had been issued by the Clinton Justice Department in the mid 1990s. In a nutshell, the Wall made it legally difficult and practically impossible for agents in the FBI’s Foreign Counter-Intelligence Division (essentially, our domestic-security service, now known as the National Security Division) to share intelligence with the criminal-investigation side of the FBI’s house. Those of us who were critics of the Wall — and I was a strenuous one, beginning in my days as a terrorism prosecutor who personally experienced its suicidal applications — made several arguments against it.
My favorite argument, which I have repeated countless times, centered on how preposterous were the underlying assumptions of the Wall. This was far easier for prosecutors than journalists, academics, and the public to grasp, because we dealt with the Justice Department’s different chains of command for criminal and national-security investigations.

Alas, after 20 years, I may have to revise my thinking.
The theory of the Clinton DOJ brass in imposing the Wall was the potential that a rogue criminal investigator, lacking sufficient evidence to obtain a traditional wiretap, would manufacture a national-security angle in order to get a wiretap under the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). A traditional wiretap requires evidence amounting to probable cause of commission of a crime. A FISA wiretap requires no showing of a crime, just evidence amounting to probable cause that the target of the wiretap is an agent of a foreign power. (A foreign power can be another country or a foreign terrorist organization.)
The reason the Wall theory was absurd was that a rogue agent would surely manufacture evidence of a crime before he’d manufacture a national-security angle. The process of getting a traditional wiretap is straightforward: FBI crim-div agents and a district assistant U.S. attorney (AUSA) write the supporting affidavit; it gets approved by the AUSA’s supervisors; then it is submitted to the Justice Department’s electronic-surveillance unit; after that unit’s approval, the attorney general’s designee signs off; then the AUSA and the FBI present the application to a district judge. FISA wiretaps, by contrast, go through a completely different, more difficult and remote chain of command. In it, the district AUSA and FBI crim-div agents who started the investigation get cut out of the process, which is taken over by Main Justice’s National Security Division and the FBI’s national-security agents. In other words, if we assume an agent is inclined to be a rogue, it would be far easier (and less likely of detection) to trump up evidence of a crime in order to satisfy the probable-cause standard for a traditional wiretap than to manufacture a national-security threat in order to get a FISA wiretap. No rational rogue would do it. 


But now, let’s consider the press reports — excerpted in David French’s Corner post— that claim that the Obama Justice Department and the FBI sought FISA warrants against Trump insiders, and potentially against Donald Trump himself, during the last months and weeks of the presidential campaign. It’s an interesting revelation, particularly in light of last fall’s media consternation over “banana republic” tactics against political adversaries, triggered by Trump’s vow to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate serious allegations of criminal misconduct against Hillary Clinton — consternation echoed by Senate Democrats during Tuesday’s confirmation hearing for attorney-general nominee Jeff Sessions.
From the three reports, from the Guardian, Heat Street, and the New York Times, it appears the FBI had concerns about a private server in Trump Tower that was connected to one or two Russian banks. Heat Street describes these concerns as centering on “possible financial and banking offenses.” I italicize the word “offenses” because it denotes crimes.Ordinarily, when crimes are suspected, there is a criminal investigation, not a national-security investigation.
According to the New York Times (based on FBI sources), the FBI initially determined that theTrump Tower server did not have “any nefarious purpose.” But then, Heat Street says, “the FBI’s counter-intelligence arm, sources say, re-drew an earlier FISA court request around possible financial and banking offenses related to the server.”

Again, agents do not ordinarily draw FISA requests around possible crimes. Possible crimes prompt applications for regular criminal wiretaps because the objective is to prosecute any such crimes in court. (It is rare and controversial to use FISA wiretaps in criminal prosecutions.) FISA applications, to the contrary, are drawn around people suspected of being operatives of a (usually hostile) foreign power.
The Heat Street report continues:
The first [FISA] request, which, sources say, named Trump, was denied back in June, but the second was drawn more narrowly and was granted in October after evidence was presented of a server, possibly related to the Trump campaign, and its alleged links to two banks; [sic] SVB Bank and Russia’s Alfa Bank. While the Times story speaks of metadata, sources suggest that a FISA warrant was granted to look at the full content of emails and other related documents that may concern US persons.
(A “US person” is a citizen or lawful permanent resident alien. Such people normally may not be subjected to searches or electronic eavesdropping absent probable cause of a crime; an exception is FISA, which — to repeat — allows such investigative tactics if there is probable cause that they are agents of a foreign power.)

Obviously, we haven’t seen the FBI affidavits (assuming they actually exist), and we do not know lots of other relevant facts. What we have, however, suggests that someone at the FBI initially had concerns that banking laws were being violated, but when the Bureau looked into it, investigators found no crimes were being committed. Rather than drop the matter for lack of evidence of criminal offenses, the Justice Department and FBI pursued it as a national-security investigation.
In June, an initial FISA affidavit (obviously prepared by the FBI and the Justice Department’s National Security Division) was submitted to the FISA court. It is said to have “named Trump” — but we don’t know whether that means (a) his name merely came up somewhere in the text of the affidavit or (b) he was an actual target whom the government wanted to investigate under FISA (meaning eavesdrop, read e-mail, and the like).
Even though the FISA standard is generally thought to be less demanding than the traditional wiretap standard (it is easier to show that someone may be colluding in some way with a foreign government than that he has committed a crime), the FISA court rejected the application that “named Trump.” 


Five months later, the Justice Department and FBI submitted a second, more “narrowly” drawn affidavit to the FISA court. The way the Heat Street report is written intimates that Trump is not named in this October application for FISA surveillance. The tie to Trump also appears weak: Heat Street says the FISA court was presented with evidence of a server “possibly related” to the Trump campaign and its “alleged links” to two Russian banks.
To summarize, it appears there were no grounds for a criminal investigation of banking violations against Trump. Presumably, based on the fact that the bank or banks at issue were Russian, the Justice Department and the FBI decided to continue investigating on national-security grounds. A FISA application in which Trump was “named” was rejected by the FISA court as overbroad, notwithstanding that the FISA court usually looks kindly on government surveillance requests. A second, more narrow application, apparently not naming Trump, may have been granted five months later; the best the media can say about it, however, is that the server on which the application centers is “possibly” related to the Trump campaign’s “alleged” links to two Russian banks — under circumstances in which the FBI has previously found no “nefarious purpose” in some (undescribed) connection between Trump Tower and at least one Russian bank (whose connection to Putin’s regime is not described).

That is tissue-thin indeed. It’s a good example of why investigations properly proceed in secret and are not publicly announced unless and until the government is ready to put its money where its mouth is by charging someone. It’s a good example of why FISA surveillance is done in secret and its results are virtually never publicized — the problem is not just the possibility of tipping off the hostile foreign power; there is also the potential of tainting U.S. persons who may have done nothing wrong. While it’s too early to say for sure, it may also be an example of what I thought would never actually happen: the government pretextually using its national-security authority to continue a criminal investigation after determining it lacked evidence of crimes.
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand

Obama’s Latest Scandal Could Land Him In Jail

 oped: I am going to stick with this until the whole damn Obama Administration is brought up on charges for Seditious Conspiracy...leading up to prosecution for Treason for the attempt to overthrow the Republic form of government our founders established...I will post this information continually until the people of the USA get it through their thick skulls that the DNC has been taken over by the Seditious Progressive Party USA {CPUSA) with the full intent of over throwing our Republic form of government and replacing it with Marxism...yes I said it...SEE: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/barry-barack-obama-is-new-anthony.html 
The main players are ...George Soros,Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is...along with former AG's Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, John Brennan, Bill and Hillary Clinton, and not to forget their usefull idiots ~>Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid who certified Barry Barack Obama as being eligible for the Office of POTUS!


Did Barack Obama and his government illegally spy on Donald Trump and his team during the 2016 campaign?
Americans were shocked when Donald Trump accused the former President of illegally monitoring his campaign’s communications.
But if it’s true, the consequences could include jail time.
Conservative radio host Mark Levin made the case that Obama used police-state tactics to illegally gather information about the Trump campaign.
He cited news reports that the Obama administration tried to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump’s communications.
According to reports, after the FISA court rejected the warrant, the Obama administration narrowed the request down to monitoring a server in Trump Tower, which they believed to be in communications with Russia.

This allegation proved to be false.
However, later reporting revealed the Obama administration was spying on the communications of Trump associates and Russian nationals.
But no evidence emerged that they were colluding with Russian intelligence operatives on hacking Democrats email accounts.
Finally, The New York Times reported the Obama administration was lowering the classification levels of intelligence regarding Russia’s involvement in the election and their communications with Trump associates so it could be more easily spread around the government and eventually leaked to the press.
Donald Trump echoed these charges on Twitter and claimed Obama illegally tapped his phone.

Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

This explosive allegation could lead to criminal prosecution for Obama and his team.
Writing at LawNewz, Robert Barnes outlines the possible criminal violations committed by the Obama team:

“This brings us to Watergate-on-Steroids or #ObamaGate. Here are the problematic aspects of the Obama surveillance on Trump’s team, and on Trump himself. First, it is not apparent FISA could ever be invoked. Second, it is possible Obama’s team may have perjured themselves before the FISA court by withholding material information essential to the FISA court’s willingness to permit the government surveillance. Third, it could be that Obama’s team illegally disseminated and disclosed FISA information in direct violation of the statute precisely prohibiting such dissemination and disclosure. FISA prohibits, under criminal penalty, Obama’s team from doing any of the three.” 


FISA can only be used to gather information on foreign intelligence information.
Barnes notes FISA warrants are only granted in cases where:

“…surveillance is information necessary to protect the United States against actual or potential “grave” “hostile” attack, war-like sabotage or international terror. Second, it can only be used to eavesdrop on conversations where the parties to the conversation are a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power. An agent of a foreign power cannot be a United States person unless they are knowingly involved in criminal espionage. No warrant is allowed on that person unless a FISA court finds probable cause the United States person is knowingly engaged in criminal espionage. Even then, if it involves a United States person, special steps must be taken to “minimize the acquisition and retention, and prohibit the dissemination, of non-publicly available information concerning un-consenting United States persons.”

Russians hacking Democrat’s email accounts did not constitute a war-like attack.
And the Trump associates were not agents of a foreign power – and no evidence has emerged that they were knowingly engaging in criminal espionage.
A FISA warrant should not have been granted under any circumstances.
Obama and his team may have knowingly broken the law when they obtained these warrants.
And allowing the information collected from these warrants to flow throughout the government so they could easily be leaked violates the law.
Now that Obama is out of office, he can be prosecuted.
If these allegations are proven to be true, will he be held accountable for his actions?


Source: http://greatamericandaily.com

AG Jeff Sessions to Pelosi: Expect Pedophile Investigations to Begin

by: MIchael DePinto

What’s the biggest threat to American democracy right now? If you believe the mainstream media, it’s definitely that old Cold War boogeyman – the Russians. The ‘Russian connection accusation’ is the current weapon of the left and the deep state which they already used effectively against Michael Flynn, and now Attorney General Jeff Sessions has landed in their crosshairs. But what are the true motives behind this?
In the following video, Right Wing News looks at how the pervasive Russian connection accusations, which the dishonest media is single-mindedly focusing on is nothing but a smokescreen to cover up the true threat – high-level pedophiles in Washington DC. President Trump, who has already cracked down on 1,500+ child sex offenders, intends to use Jeff Sessions as his own secret weapon against the DC pedophiles. No surprise then, about they are coming so hard after him.
Do you think President Trump will back down; or is it just not in his nature? This fight has only just begun.



Your News Wire reports:
A former CIA agent has warned that the deep state is working overtime to oust Attorney General Jeff Sessions from the White House because he is refusing to back down in his campaign to break up the sex trafficking and pedophile networks that control Washington D.C.
According to Robert David Steele, Jeff Sessions is being set up as another “Russian fall guy“, just like General Flynn, to taint the Trump administration and push the president closer to impeachment.
But most importantly, Steele warns, the deep state is determined to remove the most determined anti-pedophile and -corruption enforcer the office of Attorney General has seen in decades.
The former CIA agent says that the Democrats push to remove Sessions from office, led by House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi, has “every chance of succeeding” because AG Sessions has made it clear he “will not back down” under any circumstances.

Federal authorities have locked up more than 1,500 people on child trafficking and pedophilia charges since President Trump and AG Sessions assumed office, however the huge increase in numbers on recent years is being completely ignored by mainstream media.
According to the FBI there were less than 400 sex trafficking-related arrests made in the entirety of 2014, proving that Trump and Sessions are serious about using “the “full force and weight” of the U.S. government to break up child sex trafficking rings and lock up sexual predators.
In a hard-hitting video released late February, Robert David Steele claimed that President Trump is our best chance to take down the deep state since President Kennedy.

He also claimed that:
“White hat” intelligence community was able to stop Hillary from rigging the vote electronically like she did to Bernie
To give people a rough idea of what Steele is talking about when he mentions the “white hats,” the following video is one of many videos in the above two links released by Steve Pieczenik in the weeks leading up to the 2016 election. The one below, in particular, came out just days prior to the 2016 election, and it explains how months earlier, a highly placed group within the “deep state” formed a “counter-coup” via unofficial channels, and they formed with the express purpose of preventing the Clinton’s from stealing the presidency, which the Clinton's and their political machine almost did.
You are about to learn that many of the brave men and women within the FBI, CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, the military, and various other intelligence agencies, waged a counter coup in the weeks leading up to the 2016 election, with the assistance of Wikileaks, and they did so in a manner where the goal has always been to maintain the continuity of our republic, and to ensure a peaceful transition of power when the time came.  


For anyone not familiar with who Pieczenik is, he served as deputy assistant secretary of state under men such as Henry Kissinger and James Baker, so regardless of whether you believe what he is saying or not, don’t confuse him with being some right-wing “crazed conspiracy theorist” or something. 
When you consider all the news about the many ongoing conflicts between the White House and the intelligence community since Trump's election, it certainly lends legitimacy to the words spoken by Pieczenik. furthermore, it's become clear that two can play the same game, and it’s a game that is very dangerous if our republic intends to survive.   






Former CIA head John Brennan committed treason by telling lies intended to overturn the Electoral College
John Brennan, highest paid agent of Saudi Arabia, should be under FBI investigation
Reince Priebus is an enabler and cover-upper of pedophilia — Former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert is the tip of the iceberg
WikiLeaks is going to take down Priebus? 

Pedophilia is an “elite privilege” — For the Democrats it’s an “acquired taste” — Podesta is a “pedo-light”
The Republicans and the elite in banking are the ones who have made pedophilia a “big league thing”
There are Saudi Arabian and Washington DC restaurants with basements where you can order children off of the menu
DC pedophilia is the Achilles heel, and Trump has figured that out
Flynn didn’t get fired because he called the Russians
Flynn got fired because he “had the arrogance to think” (sarcasm) that he could tell Mattis and Tillerson what to do.

Flynn pissed off VP Pence
Flynn’s call that got him in trouble included a conversation about a list of high-level pedophiles inside the US, one of whom happens to be VP Mike Pence’s best friend
Flynn did not tell Pence about the list, or that his “best friend” was on it. Pence found out about this from the deep state (probably NSA taps)
The NSA has been spying on all of our politicians with impunity!
The CIA is leaking HIGHLY classified information as part of a political coup against Trump



Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand

Top Intel Official Reveals Obama Officials Behind War on Trump

oped: Indeed see: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2017/02/did-cia-just-bag-mike-flynn.html

Wow. Here's Lt. Col. Tony Schaffer going absolutely nuclear with Deirdre Bolton. As Townhall notes:

Former CIA analyst and U.S. Army Reserve Lt. Col Tony Schaffer was pretty straightforward in his Fox Business appearance today, where he said that Obama officials were definitely behind the leaks—and even named a few of them (via Free Beacon):

"Risk and Reward" host Deirdre Bolton asked Shaffer whether he thought leaks from the Obama administration were "the problem."

"Absolutely," Shaffer answered, saying the Obama administration was "directly involved" with the leak.

Shaffer said the blame lay "squarely at the feet of" the former CIA director John Brennan, former director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper, and former deputy national security advisor Ben Rhodes.

Schaffer added that Flynn was a smart guy and probably didn’t discuss the area about Russian sanctions in the manner that’s been portrayed by the Left because he knew those calls would be analyzed and reviewed somewhere down the road. He agreed that what Flynn said was probably no different than when President Obama said told then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev would have more flexibility once the 2012 election was over, which was an example cited by Bolton.

Whether or not Schaffer is right, it's clear that there are rogue elements of the national security state that are attempting to undermine our democracy. They must be dealt with. 

 Source: AAN

Did the CIA Just Bag Mike Flynn?

No Bible for Brennan swearing In!

oped: Yes indeed and President Trump need look no further than John Brennan former National Security Director and CIA Director under the Obama Administration! 
See: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/john-brennan-alleged-obama-blackmailer.html

More: The Brennan Files: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=john+brennan

There are a lot of folks that right now think that the CIA is behind the leaks that bagged Mike Flynn. As President Trump’s National Security Advisor, he would have been in a powerful position in the nation’s intelligence network. Senator Chuck Schumer has warned Donald Trump to not mess with the CIA. Is this a revenge hit?  

As Written By Thomas Lifson for American Thinker:

Make no mistake: we have just witnessed an operation by members of the CIA to take out a high official of our own government.  An agency widely believed to have brought down democratically elected governments overseas is now practicing the same dark arts in domestic American politics.  Almost certainly, its new head, Mike Pompeo, was not consulted.
Senator Chuck Schumer, of all people, laid out on January 2 what was going to happen to the Trump administration if it dared take on the deep state – the permanent bureaucracy that has contempt for the will of the voters and feels entitled to run the government for its own benefit:

New Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday that President-elect Donald Trump is “being really dumb” by taking on the intelligence community and its assessments on Russia’s cyber activities.

“Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,” Schumer told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

“So even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really dumb to do this.” 

Or, as the old rueful saying has it, “you’ve got to go along to get along.”  This means that we the people had better acknowledge that the bureaucrats have turned into our masters, and the old expression “public servant” is as ironic as anything Orwell came up with.  Schumer knows this and likes it, because the deep state wants a bigger, more powerful government, just as he does.

Note that the law was broken by whoever leaked the transcripts to the media.  Not only is the crime underlying the “scandal” being ignored, but the criminals are being hailed.  On Morning Joe‘s first hour today, the host, a former congressman (i.e., a lawmaker) himself, called the leakers “heroes.”
This interference in domestic politics by the CIA should be regarded as a major threat to our democracy, but of course our Trump-hating domestic media are reveling in a major point scored against the new president.
David P. Goldman (aka Spengler), writing on PJ Media, explains the level of hatred the CIA has for Flynn for daring to take on its spectacular…..
KEEP READING THERE IS MORE HERE!!!
Blog: CIA broke the law to take out its critic General Flynn

Obama’s ‘Diversity’ Mandates Put ‘Progressive’ Agenda over National Security

https://www.oathkeepers.org





by David Codrea 
“President Obama released a Memorandum to promote diversity in the national security workforce,” National Security Advisor Susan Rice announced Wednesday. “This is why that makes us safer and stronger.”
Rice’s ”why” is long on self-serving blather and short on “how.” She touches on “building an international order” with the UN, fighting Ebola in West Africa and pushing the transfer of wealth via “climate change” treaty (that has not been ratified by the Senate).
But the talking point to accept and repeat without question is that “our diversity” is “what makes us truly exceptional.” If you’re an Opposite Day “progressive” dependent on “divide and conquer” tactics to rally favored demographics and marginalize others, what better way to do it than with a reverse “E Unum Pluribus” motto?
And since platitudes and PR-speak do nothing in the way of proving a claim, Rice instead enlists fellow henchmen to tell us what great improvements can be made to providing for the common defense and insuring domestic tranquility by including alien cultures and “progressive values” into the national security mix.

We can start with Rice’s qualifications, aside from a career at the diversity trough starting in the Clinton administration.  Perhaps there is no more telling testament to either her competence or her willingness to parrot a lie for political CYA than her embarrassing public insistence that the Benghazi attacks were attributable to that stupid You Tube Mohammed video.
Rice is bolstered by Secretary of defense Ash Carter, whose primary focus appears to be “transgendering” the military.  They’re joined by Secretary of State John Kerry of publicly throwing away somebody’s service ribbons fame.
Adding their voices to the diversity chorus: Attorney General Loretta “turn a blind eye to Hillary’s crimes” Lynch; Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (who gave false testimony to Congress about spying on Americans); and CIA Director John Brennan, who has admitted to voting for a Communist and who may or may not have converted to Islam.
Is everybody feeling the strength of our diversity yet?

The Rice/White House announcement intentionally dovetails with the U.S. Department of Justice Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s just-released “Advancing Diversity in Law Enforcement” report. CNSNews.com has a good summary of the DOJ report I’d encourage you to read and share.
“[I]ncreased diversity within law enforcement agencies – defined not only in terms of race and gender, but also other characteristics including religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, language ability, background, and experience – serves as a critically important tool to build trust with communities,” we are assured.  But there’s a problem with the way we do things now.
“Many of the selection devices used to screen applicants, including physical ability and cognitive tests examinations and background checks, have been shown to have an unwarranted disproportionate impact on underrepresented populations,” we’re told. Physical and mental standards, and disqualifiers based on past criminal convictions, are just not conducive to promoting that diversity we need to make us all safer.

“Residency and citizenship requirements may limit certain underrepresented communities’ representation in law enforcement agencies,” the DOJ report cautions. “[T]his requirement may prevent a considerable number of racial and ethnic minorities – many of whom have valuable foreign language skills – from being hired by law enforcement agencies.”
Hey, who needs UN blue helmets when you can give a criminal pathway to citizenship foreigner who can’t pass qualification tests – but will follow orders – a badge? Now that would be diverse! And it ought to fit in neatly with the globalist Strong Cities Network agenda.
And if we really want to be “progressive,” we’ll need to let our new diversity hires choose their gender neutral pronouns (and ticket citizens for not getting them right), take a knee during the national anthem, and refuse to take an oath to a Constitution written by patriarchal slaveholders. As a matter of fact, forget Article VI: Asking them to do that last bit is not only a microagression, it’s an act of racist oppression and workplace harassment that should be cause for an ACLU lawsuit. Right?
This is all part of that “fundamental transformation of America” Obama has been promising us/threatening us with since Day One of his administration. “Diversity” as a source of strength, or at least of power, is something Hillary intends to amp up with a vengeance once she slithers her way into the White House.
Domestic enemies have no interest in “the security of a free State” except to undermine it.
 

Hillary Clinton Caught Cheating Her Way to the White House

by:Warner Todd Huston 

Aside from the obvious fact that the national media is working overtime to get Hillary Clinton elected–including some in the so-called conservative media–evidence is growing that Hillary and her party are well on the road toward cheating their way to putting Hillary in the White House.
The examples of the left cheating, lying, and committing fraud in a desperate attempt to get Hillary elected are wide and varied. They range from the more trivial to the insidious.
In one case, for instance, Hillary’s campaign hired a child actor to pretend to be a little girl who is aggrieved over Donald Trump’s “body shaming” of a past beauty pageant contestant.

During a town hall-styled event Hillary’s Hollywood actress host, Elizabeth Banks, pointed out a little girl in the audience and made as if they had only just noticed the little girl for the first time. The girl rose and delivered a very polished–almost focus group created–question on “body shaming,” a topic with which the left has recently fallen in love.
The girl was applauded for her “spontaneous” question and presented as a “normal” little girl who just happened to be in the audience. But sharp eyed viewers noted that this “little girl” is actually an actress who has appeared in several movies. Obviously Team Hillary hired the girl to ask this “spontaneous” question. The 15-year-old actress, amusingly named Brennan Leach–what a perfect last name for a Hillary supporter–was exposed very quickly.



Traci💁🏻 @tracithoms

@DanRiehl
It's like a movie. #WakeUpAmerica #fraud #PayForPlay

11:00 AM - 5 Oct 2016

It makes you wonder, if one “spontaneous” audience member was a political theater plant, how many more of the people asking questions in the audience were fakes? 

Speaking of campaign trail frauds, in another case a leaked memo reveals that Hillary Clinton was provided questions beforehand when she was “interviewed” by daytime talk show host Steve Harvey. It’s proof once again that members of the so-called un-biased media are so in the tank for Hillary that they won’t even have a light daytime interview without allowing Clinton to program every aspect of it. Harvey clearly has no integrity.
This isn’t speculation, either, as Harvey show producers later fully admitted that Steve Harvey’s interview was all a pre-scripted sham.
It may be evidence of smart campaigning by Team Hillary, but it is also proof of complicity by the left-wing, sold-out, old media establishment.
But these two examples are trivial compared to the dozens of examples of vote fraud being racked up day in and day out by Democrats across the country.
The theft of this election started way back during the Democrat primaries before Hillary even “won” her party’s nomination. Early in the process the Democrat establishment was seen working hard to make sure self-avowed socialist Vermont senator Bernie Sanders would lose to Hillary.

By one estimate, for example, Bernie lost 184 delegates that had previously pledged to vote for him and that number, the study says, would have allowed the Vermonter to thoroughly beat Hillary if those delegates had not been stolen away by hook or by cook through the various machinations of the Democrat Party.
And that doesn’t even count the fact that Hillary avoided debates, nor does it take into account that the chair of the Democrat Party was caught working behind the scenes to make sure Sanders lost.
The latter is no conjecture as chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz was kicked out of her position as the chairperson of the DNC over the scandalous revelations. And it couldn’t have come at an more embarrassing time for the Party, either, as Schultz was forced to resign just as the Democrat National Convention was beginning.
In yet another case, the Clinton campaign was accused of cheating in Kentucky when Bernie Sanders votes in Pike County were mysteriously changed from Sanders to Hillary votes. And not just a few of them, either, but over 4,000! Some feel this fraud was just enough to allow Hillary to “win” the state’s primary.

Team Hillary also committed fraud during the Iowa Caucus. During one vote count in Polk County it was revealed that Hillary’s team purposefully miscounted votes in order to give her a win over Sanders.
The vote fraud has continued since the primaries, too.
In Illinois Union operatives were caught paying people to fill out Democrat ballots. Kankakee County officials also discovered that absentee votes were being sent in by people who are not legally registered to vote in the county.
Then there is the growing vote fraud investigation in nearby Indiana where the state police have been investigating an ever growing case of vote fraud in Marion and Hendricks counties. But as the investigation got under way it became clear that fraud was being committed by Democrats in at least seven more counties. The investigation now spans nine counties.
At the heart of the investigation is a liberal activist group called Indiana Voter Registration Project run by one Craig Varoga, a Democratic strategist who back in the day was a staffer on former President Bill Clinton’s 1996 national campaign.

The liberal voter group is based in Indianapolis and appears to have submitted thousands of voter registration forms with fake, inaccurate, or missing information.
With all this illegal activity being carried out by Democrats, a study by political scientists Jesse Richman and David Earnest estimated that at least 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and maybe as many as 2.2 percent in 2010. That estimate is likely very low, but it still adds up to thousands of illegal votes.
This fraud is still going on. In fact, only just this month we had yet another case of illegal immigrants preparing to vote when officials in Virginia admitted that thousands of foreigners were registered to vote in the Commonwealth.
And according to ZeroHedge.com, a young Democrat staffer named Andrew Spieles, a student at James Madison University, confessed to registering 19 dead people to vote as Democrats.

Of course, liberals are fond of saying all this fraud is meaningless and even if there is vote fraud (which they vehemently deny) it doesn’t impact elections. But as vote fraud expert John Fund reported in August, we already have plenty of examples where vote fraud has upset election results.

But there certainly are examples of elections being overturned for reasons of fraud, including mayoral elections in Miami and East Chicago, Ind. We’ve also seen clear evidence of fraud in more important races. In 2008, illegal felon voters appear to have swung the outcome of the critical 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The day after the election, GOP senator Norm Coleman had a 725-vote lead, but a series of recounts over the next six months reversed that result and gave Democrat Al Franken a 312-vote victory.

It all adds up to clear evidence that Hillary and her party are working overtime to steal this election. So who can blame Donald Trump when he says this system is rigged?