Clinton emails silent on deadly danger facing Americans in Benghazi

By Byron York   

The newly released Hillary Clinton Benghazi emails do not contain any communications relating to security from the critical last month before the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. facility in Libya. During that period, Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who along with three other Americans would die in the attack, warned Clinton and other State Department officials of a growing danger, indeed a security emergency, in Libya. Stevens specifically noted that the possibility of an attack on Americans was growing, and, if such an attack occurred, the U.S. contingent did not have the strength to repel it. But to judge from the emails made public Friday, Clinton gave not a thought to the matter.
Go back to August 2012. On the 15th of that month, U.S. security officers in Libya held an "emergency" meeting to address the very real possibility that growing violence in the area could soon target Americans. The next day, Aug. 16, Stevens sent a cable to Clinton concluding that the Americans in Libya could not defend U.S. facilities "in the event of a coordinated attack, due to limited manpower, security measures, weapons capabilities, host nation support, and the overall size of the compound."


It was a clear call for help, one that, judging by the newly-public emails, went entirely unheard at the highest level of the State Department. Apart from some hugger-mugger analyses of Libyan politics by Clinton's friend Sidney Blumenthal, there is nothing at all in the emails concerning Benghazi from the month before the attack.
Clinton has long maintained she never saw the Aug. 16, 2012 cable. "That cable did not come to my attention," Clinton testified under oath before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in January 2013. "I have made it very clear that the security cables did not come to my attention or above the assistant-secretary level, where the [State Department internal investigation] placed responsibility."



Clinton explained that she was simply too busy, and there were simply too many cables, for her to see every one. "One-point-43 million cables a year come to the State Department," she told the House committee. "They're all addressed to me. They do not all come to me."
But wasn't that Aug. 16, 2012 cable — warning of dire consequences should the existing violence in Libya target Americans — a pretty important communication? What struck Republicans investigating Benghazi is that, while they knew Clinton was indeed busy, other equally busy top Obama administration officials did read the cable. In an appearance before the Senate Armed Services Committee, both former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey — two busy men with pretty big jobs — testified they knew about it


"You were aware that Ambassador Stevens — of his cable that said that the consulate could not withstand a coordinated attack, is that right?" Republican Sen. Kelly Ayotte, N.H., asked Panetta.
"Correct," said Panetta.
"General, you had said that you previously were aware of that?" Ayotte said to Dempsey.
"Yes, I was aware of the communication back to the State Department," Dempsey answered.
Clinton, on the other hand, insists to this day that she knew nothing. And there is nothing in the newly-released emails to contradict her sworn testimony on the matter. That should not come as a surprise to anyone. After all, because Clinton kept her communications on a separate, secret system, the only emails that State Department officials possess are the ones Clinton has given them. Clinton and her lawyers, of course, chose the emails that she gave to the State Department and then destroyed all of her email communications, including backups. Could anyone possibly be surprised that nothing Clinton turned over to the State Department — and ultimately to the public — contradicted her testimony under oath?

The period leading up to the Benghazi attacks is the most critical time in the entire tragic episode. What did Clinton know about the danger to American officials there, and what did she do about it? That is the key question of Benghazi. What happened afterward — the blame-the-video spin — can be interpreted as an attempt to cover up Clinton's inaction before the attack. Yes, the spin campaign was dishonest. But the more serious offense was allowing the conditions that led to the deaths of Stevens and three other Americans. The crime is worse than the cover-up. And if Republicans thought they would receive any new information in the Clinton-edited version of the emails released Friday, they will surely be disappointed.



 

43 Dead and Dozens Wounded on Mexican Ranch; Coming to a Town near You?

oped: Mexican Cartel Uses RPG to Shoot Down Army Helicopter..this seems to be the proverbial straw on the camels back that set off the Mexican Army  to declare war on the Cartels and take no prisoners..in other words I do believe the Mexican government has had enough!




by Michael Ware 

For the past decade, violence in Mexico has been severe and almost unabated.  Drug cartels own many officials and police corruption is rampant.  This can be directly and indirectly linked to the U.S./Columbian war on drugs.  As many of the Columbian cartels were arrested and or killed, their Mexican runners and contacts took over the business.  As the drug trade has moved north so has the violence.  This violence has intensified to a level not seen with the Columbians, who were vicious in their own right.  Now it seems that the Mexican government is seeking to get the violence and the drugs under control.
Fox reports

At least 43 people died Friday in what authorities described as a fierce, three-hour gunbattle between federal forces and suspected drug gang gunmen on a ranch in western Mexico, the deadliest such confrontation in recent memory.

We should note that only one of the forty-three was federal officers.  And the one death was a result of the officer seeking to get a wounded officer to safety.  These results are very similar to the results of a shootout in June of last year.

The lop-sided results were similar to a controversial case last June 30 in which Mexico’s army said its troops had engaged in a shootout with alleged criminals in which 22 suspects were killed but only one soldier injured. An investigation by The Associated Press revealed that many of suspects had been killed after they surrendered.
What seems apparent is that the Mexican people are tiring of this violence.  And much like the Columbians before them are beginning to clamp down on the cartels.  Who have not exactly been quiet about who they were and their activity.  This group, in particular, has been violent toward the federal police.
Fox said

In April, gunmen believed linked to the cartel ambushed a police convoy in Jalisco, killing 15 state officers and wounding five. Earlier this month, New Generation gunmen shot down a military helicopter with a rocket launcher in Jalisco, killing eight aboard.

Now, the concern for Americans is that as the cartels are stamped out in one area, they simply pop up somewhere else.  As with the Columbians with the destruction of Mexican cartels, we will likely see the emergence of someone else filling the need Americans have for drugs.  This likely will be an area not suspected.
Though America’s large cities are not strangers to gang violence, they have been immune to the type and intensity of the Mexican cartel.  One of the reasons for this is the simple facts of economics.  It is never good to shoot or maim your best customer base.  But as Mexico cracks down there is the great possibility that these murderers will carry their bases of operation to a state near you.
This may seem to be a longshot, but we must consider the ingredients needed for the cartel.  They need a society that is poor and in need of an influx of money.  They need a people devoid of the gospel and faith.  They need easy access to the buyers of their product.  And they need a society corrupt and in love with money and pleasure.  Does this sound familiar? The Obama administration et al!

ISIS: Michelle Obama Is Worth $40

by: Katie Zavadski 

The latest issue of an ISIS propaganda magazine puts a price on the First Lady in the slavery market it says will one day come to the United States.

The newest issue of English-language ISIS propaganda mag Dabiq promises to bring slave markets to the West—and claims the first lady won’t fetch a large price.
“I swear by Allah, O you who feign to be knowledgeable and shout with falsehood in every gathering, surely the slave markets will be established against the will of the politically ‘correct’!” decries Umm Sumayyah al Muhajirah, an allegedly female columnist for Dabiq who penned a defense of the terror group’s slave trade. “And who knows, maybe Michelle Obama’s price won’t even exceed a third of a dīnār, and a third of a dīnār is too much for her!”
(A January estimate puts a single golden dinar at $139 USD.)

Umm Sumayyah has written for previous issues of the magazine, telling women that immigration to the caliphate is as obligatory for them as it is for men. (Her own name, al Muhajirah, suggests that she is an immigrant herself.)
In the six-page piece titled “Slave Girls or Prostitutes,” she defends the practice of taking slaves through war—saby—as inherently Islamic, a “great prophetic Sunnah [teachings of the prophet] containing many divine wisdoms and religious benefits.” She even decries ISIS supporters who initially denied reports of slave-taking “as if the soldiers of the Khilāfah had committed a mistake or evil.”

Firsthand accounts of slavery under ISIS reveal brutal sexual assaults and unlivable conditions. Recent reports by human rights groups even suggest that Yezidi women are opting for suicide rather than to continue living with ISIS masters—leading the jihadis to confiscate the head scarves the young women have allegedly used to hang themselves.
But for the columnist writing as Umm Sumayyah, the real human-rights atrocities are prostitutes working in the West—even those working of their own free will.   

“A prostitute in your lands comes and goes, openly committing sin,” she writes. “She lives by selling her honor, within the sight and hearing of the deviant scholars from whom we don’t hear even a faint sound.”
“As for the slave-girl that was taken by the swords of men following the cheerful warrior, […] then her enslavement is in opposition to human rights and copulation with her is rape?! What is wrong with you?”

Islamic State: Saddam Hussein’s Nephew Killed Fighting for Us

The best type of terrorist.
Check it out:
The Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) claims Saddam Hussein’s nephew Ibrahim al-Sabawi died near Baiji  fighting for the terrorist group. The militants hope to capture a key oil refinery in the town. 





ISIS members and supporters posted alleged pictures of al-Sabawi’s dead body. Media outlets did not confirm if the body belonged to al-Sabawi, and the Iraq government did not release a statement.
Shi’ite militias accused al-Sabawi “of planning and participating in the Camp Speicher massacre in which ISIS is believed to have killed nearly 1,600 Iraqi Air Force cadets.” ISIS posted pictures of the slaughter on social media. Iraqi forces managed to take over the terrorist group a few months later and identified the graves. The militias begged “the international community to recognize mass killing as genocide.” 




[Salih Jasim al-Sabawi alias Abu Malik reported by ISIS  to be killed in a air strike near Baiji ]

Al-Sabawi’s father was Hasan al-Sabawi, “the late dictator’s half-brother” and “a feared intelligence chief.” The United States placed Hasan on their top 55 Most Wanted Iraqis list after the 2003 invasion. Authorities arrested him in 2005, but he died from cancer before officials could carry out his death sentences.
Continue reading on www.breitbart.com

It's Time to Bring Justice Down on the Criminal Administration of Barack Obama!

By Tim Brown 

We recently updated our list of Barack Obama's lying, lawbreaking, corruption, cronyism, hypocrisy, waste to total 1,063 documented examples of his lawlessness. On Monday, The Sons of Liberty Radio show host Bradlee Dean cited some of this behavior.
"I know a lot of people that would say, 'let the Lord deal with them,'" Dean said. "He is, and He would deal with them a lot quicker if the Church would act out what He commanded them to do."
"Why do we need to wait for Judgment Day when they pass their natural life?" Dean queried. "Why don't we bring forth judgment today or tomorrow? That's up to us America."

Dean then recounted number 18 in a list of 1,063 documented accounts of Barack Obama's lies and lawlessness.
Obama stole money from retired teachers and police officers.

During the Chrysler bankruptcy, Obama violated the Fifth Amendment and more than 150 years of bankruptcy law by illegally treating secured creditors worse than unsecured creditors. Some of these secured creditors were retired teachers and police officers from Indiana.

Richard A. Epstein, a law professor at New York University School of Law, wrote, "Upsetting this fixed hierarchy among creditors is just an illegal taking of property from one group of creditors for the benefit of another, which should be struck down on both statutory and constitutional grounds."

Todd Zywicki, Professor of Law at George Mason University School of Law, wrote that Obama's treatment of secured creditors was "dangerous to the rule of law."

The Economist wrote that Obama's actions could "establish a terrible precedent. Bankruptcy exists to sort legal claims on assets. If it becomes a tool of social policy, who will then lend to struggling firms in which the government has a political interest?" 


Francis Cianfrocca, the CEO of Bayshore Networks, wrote that Obama's actions were "an astonishingly reckless abrogation of contract law that will introduce a new level of uncertainty into business transactions at all levels, and make wealth generation more difficult going forward… An extraordinary uncertainty has been created when the most powerful man in the world can rewrite contracts and choose winners and losers in private negotiations as he sees fit. Since this is an unquantifiable uncertainty, and not a quantifiable risk, its effect on business and investor confidence will be large and unpredictable. As in the 1930s, a time when government also cavalierly rewrote private contracts, the prudent approach for business will be to invest minimally and wait for another administration." 


In other words, Barack Obama and his administration are thieves. While he thinks he is the one that rules the roost, the reality is that he is doing nothing other than what his father does. After all, the devil comes to kill, steal and destroy (John 10:10) and make no mistake about it, Barack Hussein Obama is a child of the devil.
Contrary to what many may think about Obama having the government in hand, Dean said, "The government is upon the shoulders of my big brother (Isa. 9:6)!"
Christ is the one that does away with the covenant of death and hell, but men like Obama have made a covenant with death and hell and they will surely meet their end unless they repent.
"The piper's going to be paid," Dean continued. "God is not mocked. For whatsoever a man sows that shall he also reap."

He then spoke to the Church in America.
"He's (Obama) been uncovered over and over and over… again. When are you going to deal with him?"
This same message is similar to the ones given by the prophets in the Old Testament. Remember, their primary function was not forth telling of future events. Yes, they did that and those prophecies were mainly to point the way to the One who was coming, the Christ. Yet, their message was always calling the people of God to repentance. They constantly called them to turn from their sin (transgression of the law) and turn back and obey God.
The message is the same today. In fact, sadly we are having to tell people to turn away from "pretended law," which is against the law of God. Furthermore, we're dealing with wolves in sheep's clothing who know nothing of the Gospel that truly saves from sin, but are content with a gospel (which is no gospel at all) that leaves men in their sin.

While Dean assumed there would be people that would think his message was the same all the time, he affirmed what they may be thinking. It's time that the people rose up and demanded justice against the criminals that serve the people while acting as though they are under the authority of God. 


But let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream. –Amos 5:24

RINO’s Applaud - Lindsey Graham is in for 2016!

By Onan Coca  

The new king of the RINO caucus, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), announced on Sunday that he would indeed be running for the GOP nomination in 2016. It may seem crazy for Graham to run, considering that he is widely considered to be the most reviled Republican (among Republicans) in Congress today… but he’s going for it. It’s not quite clear how someone who is deeply unpopular with his party’s base is supposed to win nomination to national office, but Graham has assured us that he will indeed try.
Why?
Make no mistake - Graham is running for one reason and one reason alone – to make sure Rand Paul doesn’t win. That’s it. That’s all.
Here’s what Graham said is the best reason for Americans to vote for him…
"I'm running because I think the world is falling apart and I've been more right than wrong on foreign policy.” 


Well that is just foolishness.



Graham and his allies (John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Hillary Clinton, etc) have basically dictated American foreign policy for the last 20+ years. Folks, I shouldn’t have to tell you that they have been more WRONG than right over that time and the proof is easy to find… just watch the nightly news. Now Graham is worried that people are starting to realize just how bad the Graham/McCain (sometimes called neocon – but there is nothing conservative about it) foreign policy has been and so he is doing his damndest to make sure that any alternative view (IE – Rand Paul’s views) are shut down and derided as “isolationist.”
Ben Domenech at the Federalist had a wonderful article detailing just how ridiculous Lindsey Graham’s run for the White House is. You should read the whole piece but here’s my favorite bit, just for you to enjoy dear reader.
Spend any amount of time around the good senator and you’ll hear more extreme sentiments expressed publicly than from any other candidate for the Republican nomination.  





He holds an expansive view of the unrestricted powers of the executive branch; a steadfast belief in protecting the administrative state; and he has expressed doubts about much of the Bill of Rights. He does not believe bloggers deserve first amendment protections. He does not believe Americans suspected of terrorist acts deserve to be read their rights. And he, like Hillary Clinton, believes the Citizens United decision was a monstrosity that ought to be overturned – he has called for a Constitutional amendment to do so.
In more senses than one, Graham takes after John C. Calhoun – a warhawk with progressive views of government and an ahistorical view of the Constitution whose primary motivation, first and last, is power.
Graham also regularly says things that are not just wacky, but absurd, even within his own established field of foreign policy and national security. 


I’ve tired of begging the beautiful people of South Carolina to stop voting for Graham, but I’ll do my level best to make sure that the rest of the nation realizes just how bad of a candidate he really is. Folks, Lindsey Graham is no conservative. He is a Big Government, Big Brother, small constitution, power hungry politician… and you do not want to give him any more power than he already has. I guarantee it.
Listen as Graham explains his reasons for running for President on CBS This Morning.
I've got the best job in the world: Senator from South Carolina. I've got a very comfortable life. I'm running because of what I see on television.
The world is falling apart. I've been more right than wrong on foreign policy.  

It is not the fault of others, or their lack of this or that,
but the reason I will run is my ability, in my own mind, to be commander in chief. And to make Washington good. The reason I had six primary opponents in my last election is that I have been accused of working together with Democrats too much. In my view, Democrats and Republicans work together too little, and I would try to change that if I got to be president. When it comes to radical Islam I would come after them before they come back here again. 

Dr. Ben Carson Wins Georgia Straw Poll for President in Stunning Landslide!

By Onan Coca 
Where might you expect to find Dr. Ben Carson’s stronghold of support? Look no further than the deep south, where in my home state of Georgia, the GOP Presidential candidate scored a stunning victory in the 2015 Georgia State Convention Straw Poll. Dr. Carson won just over 76% of the convention vote easily dominating Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) and Governor Scott Walker (R-WI) who came in 2^nd and 3^rd with 7% and 6% of the vote respectively. Senators Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) rounded out the top 5 in support.
The poll results were reported on the Facebook page of the Georgia Association of Republican County Chairmen with a special editorial comment congratulating Dr. Carson’s supporters who spread the poll around on social media.



While the Carson campaign can take some comfort in the win, the straw poll is hardly scientific, and at the end of the day, Georgians are much more likely to support a known-quantity like Scott Walker or Marco Rubio or perhaps even Mike Huckabee. Dr. Carson is exactly the kind of candidate that Georgia Republicans like to vote for, but his recent slip ups make the odds of that far less likely.

Donald Trump – a Mainstream Democrat Masquerading in the GOP

By Onan Coca 

Sigh.
I will never understand the affection that some of my GOP friends have for wealthy businessman-come-politician Donald Trump. I have said it before and I will apparently be forced to say it again – Donald Trump is a Terrible Republican. He proved it again in an appearance with Megyn Kelly on Fox News Thursday afternoon.
Kelly got straight to the point zeroing in on two recent incidents that demonstrate that the Donald is no conservative.
The first was about free speech. After the recent incident in Garland, Texas and the ruckus surrounding the Mohammed Drawing Contest, Trump derided Pamela Geller for hosting such a controversial event.

The U.S. has enough problems without publicity seekers going out and openly mocking religion in order to provoke attacks and death. BE SMART

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 5, 2015 

KELLY: Let’s talk about free speech because after that Pam Geller event down in Garland, Texas, where they were attacked and the two would-be Jihadi’s were shot dead by the police force, you also sent out some tweets saying why taunt in order to provoke possible death? Dumb in that moment.
TRUMP: I think Pam Geller is a terrible messenger. I think she’s terrible. We have enough problems without taunting and driving everybody crazy. 
KELLY: But my question to you is, because this turned into a bigger thing, like what do we stand for as Americans if not for freedom of speech, ability to express yourself, this speech in particular which was in defiance, it’s like the cartoon that won the contest it had Muhammad standing there saying you can’t draw me and the person looking up to him saying, that’s why I draw you. It was about people trying to shut down an American ideal and this group, however unsympathetic they may have been, saying, we reject that attempt. 


TRUMP: They were totally unsympathetic. Now, you look at Muhammad and you look at some of the positions they have Muhammad and some people are going to get extremely upset about it. Now, I’m not the only one and I’m not the only Conservative Republican that feels this way. They’re lucky to be alive. Why with all the problems we have, why taunt? 

Look, you may feel like the Mohammed cartoon event was unwise and that there are better ways to fight for free speech. But Pamela Geller doesn’t… and that is the whole point of her demonstration. Geller believes that Islam and Sharia Law present the gravest threats to free speech that the West has faced in over 50 years. Her decision to hold a “draw Mohammed” contest proved to be the perfect tool for debating free speech because two Muslim men attacked the event, then liberals seemingly sided with them and against Geller!

Kelly also brought up a pair of Trump tweets that came on the heels of the terrible Amtrak train crash. After the crash Trump was quick to tweet that America has infrastructure issues… issues he would fix by spending more of our money.

Amtrak crash near Philadelphia, train derails -many hurt, some badly. Our country has horrible infrastructure problems. Pols can't solve!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 13, 2015

There was also this tasteless tweet – which Trump quickly deleted. (But the internet is forever.)

Trump being the solidly liberal “Republican” that he is believes that the best way to solve our infrastructure problem is to spend American tax dollars in doing so. Instead of discussing how we should reform the way we spend our infrastructure money, Trump’s plan is to spend more money on it. Ostensibly, he would spend less on overseas spending (great) while increasing spending here at home (not so great). 

Our infrastructure issues are not an outgrowth of a spending problem – they are directly related to a bureaucracy problem. The way to fix our bridges and roads that have become dilapidated is by removing federal oversight to such issues and returning control to those things to states and localities. Let local governments spend infrastructure dollars to fix problem areas instead of expecting the “all seeing eyes” in Washington, D.C. to figure out how to best spend those dollars in places as far flung as Wasilla, Alaska and Tampa, Florida.
Face it, folks, while Donald Trump may make a good attack dog every now and again (when he’s focused on Obama and Hillary), he almost never mutters a conservative answer to a political question.

Ok enough of politicking...break time..Bikini hour...lol

Well Hell...The Obama administration is one big headache...time for a beach party break to regroup ...so all I have to say about this:  

https://youtu.be/VLHsdlU5_Oc  

 

 

 

This Is What 100 Years Of The Bikini Looks Like

A bikini blast from the past. 

by:Julie Gerstein 

Believe it or not, this is what women used to wear to go swimming during the 1890s. 

 

They were also required to use “bathing machines” so that no one could see them climb in and out of the water in their indecent bathing costumes, but that’s a whole other story.

For much of the early 20th century, modesty prevailed on boardwalks and pool decks. 

 

It wasn’t until the 1930s that anything resembling a modern-day swimsuit made its way to the beach. 

 

And though it was ~technically~ invented in 1946 (and named after the Bikini Atoll Islands), most women didn’t dare wear a bikini until the sexually liberated ’60s. 

 

In the ’80s, suits were super high cut. 

 

Women of the 1890s could NEVER have imagined what we’d be going to the beach in today. 

 

Check out the whole awesome, belly-baring vid — featuring Vine star Amanda Cerny — here. 

http://www.buzzfeed.com/juliegerstein/watch-100-years-of-the-bikini-in-a-little-over-a-minute#.ptEA4vK53

 

WHITE FEMALE COP KILLED BY BLACK THUG: Please Note That NO RIOTS Ensued

The officer was shot one day before welcoming home her pre-mature daughter from the hospital.

A suspect being sought by police for an Omaha shooting opened fire Wednesday on officers, prompting police to return gunfire in a shootout that left a 29-year-old detective and the suspect dead.

Officer Kerrie Orozco died at Creighton University Medical Center shortly after the 1pm gun battle, Police Chief Todd Schmaderer said at a hospital news conference.

Schmaderer said the suspect, 26-year-old Marcus Wheeler, also passed away at the hospital. 

Orozco was part of a fugitive task force looking for Wheeler to serve a felony arrest warrant. Wheeler, who was wanted on a warrant charging him in a previous shooting, opened fire on the officers as they approached him.

…

A semi-automatic handgun was also found on Wheeler, Schmaderer said. ‘Mr. Wheeler is a convicted felon and a known gang member,’ he said.

Orozco was a seven-year veteran of the department and worked in its gang unit, Schmaderer said. She was also a new mother with a premature baby, Olivia Ruth, who is in an Omaha hospital.

‘The (baby) is set to be released from the hospital tomorrow,’ Schmaderer said, his voice breaking.

Read more: Daily Mail

DOJ Official: Slavery to Blame for Riots in Ferguson and Baltimore

[Anthony Johnson...Father of US Slavery]

oped: Well the DOJ got it partially correct...however they are assuming slavery was caused by old Christian white men...not true the father of US slavery was in fact a black man...as for the continued slavery of minorities the blame falls on the progressive democrat party...who by the way started the KKK after the Civil War and wrote : the Black Codes, lynchings and Jim Crow segregation.  
Moving forward George Soros is responsible for the riots in Ferguson and Balitimore as well as the racism we see continue dating from the 1950's forward!  

SEE:  

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/father-of-us-slavery-was-black-man.html

 http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2015/05/ferguson-protesters-protest-not-getting.html


by J. Christian Adams


Vanita Gupta, head of the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, has told a lawyers group in Colorado that slavery and Jim Crow helped fuel the Ferguson and Baltimore riots.
The last few days have seen a number of fanciful stories with the Obama administration seemingly questioning the authority of local police. I’ve long maintained that the administration is nakedly seeking to federalize policing standards — but get rid of local police? No way, that sounds like something broadcast from a shortwave station in Austin, Texas.

But then up steps Vanita Gupta to lend some credibility to the idea that some want to disband local police and replace police powers with the federal government. Speaking to a group of left-wing lawyers in Colorado, Gupta had this to say: 

The conversation in these rooms, however, is not about whether to have police or not but about what kind of policing communities want and deserve.
There is no question that we need police in our communities.

The conversation? What conversation is Gupta hearing that needs to be corrected?  Who brought up the idea we might not need police? Nobody sane, for sure.
If you read the entirety of Gupta’s speech, you’ll get a sense of what is going on in the mind of the anti-police left.   Officials in this administration still think it is rational and acceptable to bring up the name Michael Brown in the context of anything other than a likely felon against whom deadly force was justifiably used. Behold Gupta: Eric Garner.  Michael Brown.  Tamir Rice.  John Crawford.  Walter Scott. Freddie Gray.

These names and many others have become familiar to us under tragic circumstances in recent months.  Their deaths and those of other unarmed African American men and women in encounters with police officers, have provoked widespread responses across the country and have fueled the Black Lives Matter movement. In communities of color, in particular, the reaction has been stark and sobering.
In the seven months I have been at the Civil Rights Division, I have spent a lot of time with local leaders and community members in cities all across America, including with numerous mothers who have lost their children in officer-involved shootings. The pain, anger, frustration — the lack of trust in the police — is real, and it is profound.

Gupta asks the question that many Americans have already asked and answered:

It’s worth asking, first, how did we get here? And second, what are we going to do about it?

To most law-abiding Americans, the idea of fleeing from the police, or worse, charging at a policeman you have already punched, is simply beyond the realm of possibility.
So how did we get here? Was it a breakdown of values? Perhaps a pervasive tolerance for lawlessness? Of course not.  Says Gupta:
Let’s start with the first question and consider the source of the mistrust. Mistrust can’t be explained away as the kneejerk reaction of the ill-informed or the hyperbolic. It’s in part the product of historical awareness about the role that police have played in enforcing and perpetuating (wait for it! here it comes!) slavery, the Black Codes, lynchings and Jim Crow segregation.  


Give Gupta credit, she adheres to the fringe orthodoxy on race at the schools she attended: Yale and New York University Law School. Perhaps you can’t blame her, because she’s never heard anything different. But she’s wrong. The riots in Baltimore and Ferguson are related to slavery and lynchings as much as the Waco biker bloodbath is the fault of the Rolling Stones hiring the Hells Angels at Altamont.

Ferguson Protesters Protest Not Getting Their Checks For Protesting

oped: It is fair to assume the same group was involved in the Baltimore riots!

 

On May 14, protesters, upset with not being paid their promised checks for protesting, protested outside MORE, Missourians Organizing For Reform and Empowerment, an ACORN organization which had received funding through George Soros to fund the protests. 

 

This protester indicates those who protested for more money were paid $2700 to stop making a fuss, but it would then impact the ability to protest over the summer in #Ferguson:
 

They even started a hashtag, #cutthechecks, to demand their money(@organizemo is the Twitter account of MORE):

Post Continues on www.weaselzippers.us

Dreams of Obama: Everything Is Awesome, Ramadi Edition

The JV team is on the run — yes, running roughshod over whole swaths of the Middle East and Africa.

Hallucinating is now official White House policy. Despite the catastrophic fall of Ramadi, John Kerry says “Daesh” (g-d forbid he says the Islamic State) has been “driven back.” What is he smoking? Obama’s bong?

Don’t count on the enemedia for clarity, accuracy or factual reportage. They are too busy amassing armies against ….. me. 

 

 

Huge ISIS Convoy Parades Out in the Open in West Anbar Province in Iraq

Fantasy-based analysis. Recently I asked, “has Baghdad Bob become Secretary of Defense?” No, he has become Secretary of State. “Kerry: Don’t Worry About Fall of Ramadi, ‘Daesh...

Read the whole entry »

Thug Tells Whites: Bow Down to Blacks, You’re All Gonna Die

 

Obama has made sure that racism is alive in well in what should be a color blind society.
Check it out:
A shocking confrontation filmed on the streets of New York highlights the racial animosity that continues to plague America in the aftermath of last year’s Ferguson riots and the rise of the #BlackLivesMatter movement. 



The incident began when a member of the Five-Percent Nation, a militant offshoot of the Nation of Islam, began harassing a group of white hipsters in Union Square.
An older black man begins an argument with the group before threatening to “turn this motherfucker upside (down).”
“Where’s your man at? I’ll get him first. Straight up, I don’t give a fuck,” yells the man, adding, “I’m a thug, I’m from Brooklyn,” before referring to himself as the “King.”
One of the hipsters then jumps towards “King” and other members of the Five-Percent Nation, one of whom is wearing a “fuck the police” sweater, quickly move in to disperse the confrontation.
“You’re a dead man – I promise you,” yells “King” towards the man who confronted him.
However, the tone of the confrontation then begins to turn even more sinister as another member of the Five-Percent Nation states, “That’s why I stopped him, because this motherfucker should be bowing to him.” 


Continue reading on www.infowars.com

Turkey: Muslims shoot 19-year-old woman in the head for appearing on a televised song contest

“Muslims shoot 19-year-old woman in the head for appearing on a televised song contest,” (thanks to Jihad Watch)

“The Posta newspaper reported on Sunday that Kaya had been threatened by relatives after travelling to Istanbul to take part in the contest.” By relatives. “Mutlu Kaya, 19, from the conservative region of Diyarbakir in the Kurdish-majority south-east of of the country…” By “conservative” AFP doesn’t mean “Reagan fans” or “supporters of free speech,” but “given to enforcing Sharia oppression of women by violence.” For the mainstream media, “conservative” essentially means “anything we don’t like.”

“Turkish talent show singer ‘shot in...

Read the whole entry »

Muslims & Sodomites: Birds of a Feather…

by:Tim Brown 

We've been reporting on the push by Islamists in Texas against an anti-foreign laws bill that would render Shariah in America impotent (as though it actually needed such legislation). Angry Muslims voiced their opinions against such bills after the establishment of a Shariah tribunal in Texas back in January (a tribunal that was formed with deceptive "judges" claiming to be "attorneys.") However, Irving Mayor Beth Van Duyne had become a heroine of sorts in putting her foot down to Islamists who seek to bring in Islamic law to Texas and she said that she won't be deterred nor bullied.   

This became the subject of The Sons of Liberty Radio show on Monday. Show host Bradlee Dean exposed exactly what Islam is about in America. It's about the same thing that the militant sodomites are about here, mainly upending America's laws and sovereignty.   

While many Islamists believe they are above the law here in America, nothing could be further from the truth and those who are seeking to advance Islamic law above the laws of the land, are looking to violate the law.
"That is against the law!" Dean said. "But keep in mind that the head of CAIR in Texas (Herman Mustafa Carroll) said, 'We are above the laws of the United States of America. We are just doing what the President of the United States is doing.'"
Hamas-CAIR has recently been branded a terror group as they have close ties to the designated terror group the Muslim Brotherhood.
However, Mr. Carroll and those who want to impose a Shariah tribunal and Shariah law upon the people of Texas heard from Irving Mayor Beth Van Duyne. The mayor told unhappy Muslims to "respect, obey and embrace" the laws.

Dean then played a clip from a newscast in which they portrayed the Muslims as though they were being persecuted for their religion. The Sons of Liberty Radio host took issue with that saying that they believed it was persecution because they couldn't come to America and establish their laws over the laws of the United States.
"This is exactly how the homosexuals react and respond to our laws," he said. "What have they been doing over the last five and six and seven years in the United States of America?"
"To enforce the laws, is now to hate!" Dean thundered. "To enforce the laws… well, now if you do that, you're called a bigot. It's exactly what the Muslims are doing, friends."  

Thus Dean concluded, "Now we can understand why the Muslims and homosexuals are embracing one another in the United States of America."
Indeed! Just as the Muslims are using the deceptive tactics (taqiyya) of the sodomites in claiming hate crimes, they are also seeking to overturn and manipulate the law to allow them to continue their criminal and illicit behavior.
Shariah cannot exist in American society. If it is allowed to breed, just as sodomy has been allowed to breed, our law will be turned on its head and instead of justice being enforced (something that desperately needs to be done now), nothing but injustice will be applied to the people.

Both the sodomites and the Muslim have only one hope to save them not only from their sin, but also from their ultimate end and that is found in the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ.

 

Appeals Court rules against Obama’s Sharia Regarding Muhammad Video

 



by:Pamela Geller 
Obama’s war on free speech in accordance with the sharia was delivered the long overdue fatal blow. 
The sharia-complaint commander-in-chief knew well in advance of an Islamic plot against the consulate on the tenth anniversary of 9/11. He left our men there to die and then — blamed free speech.
Hillary was his hatchet man, quietly prodded on by her Muslim Brotherhood lover, Huma Abedin (here and here and here).
Hillary has been actively working with the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) to impose sharia restrictions on the First Amendment. Has she answered any questions regarding the jihad attack against the free speech event in Texas?

“Appeals Court rules YouTube should not have been forced to take down film critical of Muhammad, By Robert Spencer, May 18, 2015
A victory for the freedom of speech, but it hardly matters now: all jihadists need to do in order to get us to stop saying anything negative about Islam or Muhammad is to threaten to kill us, and everyone folds up, cowers and submits.
“Appeals Court Sides With Google in Anti-Muslim Film Case,” by Sudhin Thanawala and Brian Melley, Associated Press, May 18, 2015:
YouTube should not have been forced to take down an anti-Muslim film that sparked violence in the Middle East and death threats to actors, a federal appeals court ruled Monday in a victory for free speech advocates.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal sided with Google, which owns YouTube, after free speech advocates urged the court to overturn a 2-1 decision by three of its judges. The three judges had ordered YouTube to take down the video.
Actress Cindy Lee Garcia wanted “Innocence of Muslims” removed from the site after receiving death threats. Her lawyer argued she had a copyright claim to the low-budget film because she believed she was acting in a different production.
Google argued Garcia had no claim to the film because the filmmaker wrote the dialogue, managed the production and dubbed over her lines.

It wasn’t immediately clear if or when the video would be reposted on YouTube. A Google spokesman did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
The film inspired rioting by those who considered it blasphemous to the Prophet Muhammad and President Barack Obama and other world leaders asked Google to take it down.
Google, which said those requests amounted to censorship, was joined by an unusual alliance of filmmakers, other Internet companies and prominent news media organizations that didn’t want the court to alter copyright law or infringe on First Amendment rights.

YouTube and other Internet companies were concerned they could be besieged with takedown notices, though it could be hard to contain the film that is still found online.
A lawyer for Google argued in December that if a bit player in a movie has copyright privileges, it could extend to minor characters in blockbusters, shatter copyright law and ultimately restrict free speech because anyone unhappy with their performance could have it removed from the Internet.
“The ultimate effect is to harm the marketplace of speech,” attorney Neal Katyal told the court during a hearing in Pasadena….


Editor's Note: The AP wrongly keeps pushing the narrative that the film sparked the rioting. It did not and we have documented it thoroughly here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here. However, the video was the scapegoat for the Benghazi attacks.
Source
 

Evidence Now Is Conclusive That Obama And Hillary Should Be Indicted And Put On Trial For TREASON

by:Walid Shoebat 
Judicial Watch announced today that it "obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified "Secret" documents from the Department of Defense (DOD)and the Department of State, revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked "Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman" (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance." Judicial Watch added what has been proven and obvious for years—that "Benghazi attack" was "not about a response to an anti-Muhammad video" or was it "the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo" and that A Defense Department document dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on "the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group" "to kill as many Americans as possible."

While Judicial Watch did a fantastic job in proving that this document was sent to "then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council," but what the Defense Department revealed was nothing new.
The heavily redacted Defense Department "information report" says that the attack on the Benghazi facility "was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR)."



The evidence for all this was already released, by Shoebat.com (while doubted by idiots) in 2012, which was researched with assistance from Libyan intelligence sources from which Shoebat.com not only obtained this confirmation but also sent findings to the National Center For Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism, a 'huff-and-puff' agency Shoebat.com dealt with, and to be frank, were unfit of being street sweepers.
This agency threw the valuable intelligence sources from Libya under the bus, an intelligence that not only helped resolve details about Benghazi, but would pin-point terrorist weapons cache with latitude and longitude accuracy. This was a team of x-Qaddafi intelligence who desired nothing more than to reverse U.S. policy in Libya and exposed the very assassins of Americans during the Benghazi affair. These were the true heroes and not these 'street-sweepers.'

The Department of Defense agency's information was lacking that the Muslim Brotherhood's involvement stems from the top. Mohammad Morsi's involvement in his defense for the blind Sheikh and his Egyptian Ansar Al-Sharia's branch involvement with Ansar Al-Sharia in Libya, the very element that attacked the U.S. in Bebghazi which later became ISIS itself.
The countless documents and evidence Shoebat.com provided on this issue was immense and took years to compile. There should be no doubt now regarding the year's worth: 450 reports on Benghazi affair alone.
And just for one little example out of thousands, Shoebat.com reported in detailed evidence on how the Salafists and the Muslim Brotherhood under Morsi planned the attack on U.S. embassies prior to 9/11/2012.

This is an agency (the Defense Department) who did not reveal everything and does not know how to spell such names as Al-Libi, whom we reported on (which they spell Alaliby), Sufian Gammu (which they spell GUMMA), or Abdul Baset Azzouz (which they spell AZUZ). All this hush-hush in both media and government, which we exposed long ago with detailed evidence, and it takes a court order to confirm this joke:




What can be obtained from newspapers on the streets of the Middle East was not as "classified," information we provided with immense detail including better classified documents from Middle Eastern sources.

SEE: http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/05/evidence-now-is-conclusive-that-obama-and-hillary-should-be-indicted-and-put-on-trial-for-treason/




The American reader would read: "A violent radical," the DIA report says, is "the leader of BCOAR is Abdul Baset ((AZUZ)), AZUZ was sent by ((ZAWARI)) to set up Al Qaeda (AQ) bases in Libya."
Really?
Did we just now need a confirmation that "member of the Muslim brotherhood movement…where they have large caches of weapons …" and was involved in Benghazi?
Shoebat.com working with x-intelligence officers had reported on Abdul Baset Azzouz (AZUZ) back in 2012: "Known for his vicious and cunning abilities, he was the first adviser to Ayman Al-Zawahiri and became the leader of Al-Qaeda in Darnah, Libya. He can be seen in this video, giving his testimony from Libya (wearing yellow). Azzouz can even be seen recruiting entire communities in Libya to join the jihadists."
In our Libyan Leaks: More Secret Documents Reveal Obama's Failure In Libya, "Sufyan Gammu of Ansar Al-Sharia in Darnah (white cap and long beard) is one of the most wanted men from Al-Qaeda. He used to be the special driver for Usama Bin Laden and is now roaming free in Libya, protected by the government."

Shoebat.com detailed research in 2013, investigated Benghazi and determined that the Muslim Brotherhood and Ansar Al-Sharia with branches in Libya and in Egypt were the main hand in the attack.
From as far back as July 27, 2012, even before the Benghazi attack itself, other Americans warned about the threats of the Blind Sheikh's son that appeared in the Egypt Independent: 

The son of Omar Abdel Rahman, a Jama'a al-Islamiya leader known as the "Blind Sheikh" who was convicted of terrorism charges in the US in 1995, threatened to organize a protest at the US Embassy in Cairo and detain the employees inside.
Abdallah Abdel Rahman's threat came during a press conference organized by the sheikh's family near the highly fortified American embassy compound on Thursday evening.
Abdel Rahman demanded that President Mohamed Morsy intervene for the release of his father as he did in the case of Egyptian journalist Shaimaa Adel who was detained for nearly two weeks for covering protests in Sudan then flown back to Egypt on a plane with Morsy.

In fact, the Blind Sheikh's son was threatening to kidnap Americans from the U.S. embassy in Cairo to exchange for his father and was calling on Morsi to get involved. Shoebat.com provided EXHIBIT A and EXHIBIT B with video, shot in real time during the attack in which gunmen can be heard shouting, that they were sent by Morsi, the very terrorist whom now the State Department is in bed with is also the very terrorists, it now defends. Some even attempted to refute our findings but failed, not knowing how to spell a word of Arabic.
The other is a document that implicates Ansar al-Sharia Egypt, which clearly had representatives outside the U.S. Embassy in Cairo on 9/11/12. Another Egypt Independent article, dated April 10, 2012, is being submitted as EXHIBIT Z2. 

So now, and thanks to Judicial Watch, we all know that:

"The first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. An October 2012 report confirms: Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG's, and 125 mm and 155mm howitzers missiles."

Another DIA report, written in August 2012, said that the opposition in Syria was driven by al Qaeda and other extremist Muslim groups: "the Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [Al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria."

Judicial Watch concluded: The growing sectarian direction of the war was predicted to have dire consequences for Iraq, which included the "grave danger" of the rise of ISIS.
Some of the "dire consequences" are blacked out but the DIA presciently warned one such consequence would be the "renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena."
Judicial Watch concludes:

"…why would the Obama administration continue to support the Muslim Brotherhood even after it knew it was tied to the Benghazi terrorist attack and to al Qaeda? These documents also point to connection between the collapse in Libya and the ISIS war – and confirm that the U.S. knew remarkable details about the transfer of arms from Benghazi to Syrian jihadists," stated Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president. "These documents show that the Benghazi cover-up has continued for years and is only unraveling through our independent lawsuits. The Benghazi scandal just got a whole lot worse for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton."

We as a nation, claim that we are fighting terrorists. How so? Especially when the terrorists are in the White House and in the State Department as well.
God is watching.
Source