by Jan Morgan
Gun owners in Nevada have a new best friend in Republican Michele Fiore of Las Vegas!
Fiore is the newly designated Assembly Majority Leader and she is on a mission to defeat liberalism.
Fiore, in an interview with the Las Vegas Review-Journal said this week
her primary objective is to do what is necessary to recover gun rights in her home state!
Fiore said: “We’re getting our gun rights back this session, period.”
(I love a decisive woman who understands that the first step to securing liberty is an armed citizenry.) (smile)
Fiore said she wants bills allowing concealed carry permit holders to carry guns for self-defense on campuses of the Nevada System of Higher Education.
In addition, she wants high schools adopt “rifle clubs” again, so
young people are exposed to firearm safety and responsible gun
ownership.
If that’s not enough to cause a liberal melt down, Fiore says she
will push for the repeal of gun control measures currently on the books.
She specifically said she “would push for bills eliminating Clark
County’s ‘blue card’ gun registration program.”
The “blue card” program requires individuals who buy a handgun in
Clark County to register the weapon with the police. Fiore wants that
registration program ended. ( good for her)
In addition to recovering gun rights, Fiore also plans to push a Voter ID law for Nevada.
(What is not to love about this woman?)
Thank you Nevada for showing the country that Harry Reid does NOT
represent the will of the people in your state! Take a bow for electing
some strong conservatives who will play a vital role in restoring our
Constitutional Republic! Recovering GUN RIGHTS is a vital step in the
right direction!
oped: OMG what a find...however it is sad they were left to the elements for so many years and now major restoration is needed to bring them back to life...nauseating to say the least!
From Corvettes
to Aston Martins, the rising prices commanded by classic cars —
especially unrestored, mostly original examples — has created a goldmine
for those who hunt for old vehicles rotting away unattended in some
barn.
Today, a French auction house revealed a discovery it called the King
Tut of barn finds; a treasure trove of 60 European cars, including a
rare Ferrari missing for decades, that had been slowly decaying in
western France.
The Artcurial auction house
says the cars belonged to a shipping magnate, Roger Baillon, who
collected fine vehicles in the 1950s as part of a plan to build his own
museum. When his business faltered in the 1970s, he sold off roughly
half of his cars and simply left the rest parked in various states of
exposure; some were in fully enclosed garages, but many were slightly
protected from the elements by corrugated tin lean-toos.
"This
was somewhere between a metallic graveyard and a museum," said Pierre
Novokoff, a senior specialist at Artcurial. "Nature had taken a hold,
over the years. Ivy had invaded a car and entirely covered its wheel,
while weeds had taken root in a passenger compartment as easily as in a
greenhouse. In places, the sheets of corrugated iron were resting
directly on the cars."
And about those cars. The most
valuable is the one that's also been the most sheltered, albeit covered
in books and papers — a 1961 Ferrari 250 GT SWB California Spyder that
once belonged to actor Alain Deion. Only 37 were built, and a
well-cared-for example fetched $15 million in August at Gooding &
Co.'s sale in Pebble Beach. Parked nearby was a Maserati A6G Gran Sports with coachwork by Frua, one of only three made.Baillon's
tastes ran to other high-end models — Talbot-Lago, Hispano-Suiza and
Bugatti — often picking cars with custom coachwork and other amenities.
Artcurial
will sell the cars on Feb. 6 at its Retromobile sale, and while many
will need extensive restoration judging by the photos provided above,
many will likely find buyers willing to spend a multiple of what they
will likely pay at auction bringing them back to life. When the
Egyptians buried King Tut, at least they knew they were locking him up
with rooms full of treasure.
oped: Wow really?....hmmm and here the looney left progressives state we are heading back to the 1950-60's racism era....hello if so why was there no outrage when the black group 'The Drifters' cut a 45 record 'White Christmas' in the 60's? Yes indeed progressive is just a new name for Comrade and KKK !
via:ClashDaily
I joked the other day via Facebook that White Christmas would soon be
considered a racist song. Well … here it is. Check it out you creepy ass
crackers!
TPNN
– These Christmas bashing progressives have taken their hate-filled
paranoia to a new level with their attacks against country singer Darius
Rucker, who happens to be black. What did Rucker do that drew the hate
of the liberals? He sang White Christmas at Rockefeller Center in New
York City.
Liberals immediately took to Twitter to display their idiocy and attack Rucker.
Darius Rucker On TV
singing "Im dreaming of a White Christmas" In NY Like He Free In
America. We tired of These 'White" Christmases
— BraekHaven (@HicklenJeremiah) December 4, 2014
Darius Rucker singing White Christmas in Rockefeller Center. One block over, streets shut down for Eric Garner. Utterly surreal.
— Rich Villar (@elprofe316) December 4, 2014
Of course they have Darius Rucker singing "Dreaming of a white Christmas ", fucking white people.
— Sleepy Bison (@stephdom8626) December 4, 2014
Can't believe people form Ferguson aren't boycotting darrius Rucker after that performance of white christmas
— Jake Howells (@jHowells2) December 4, 2014
by Donald Joy
Sleazy race-agitators like Eric Holder and Barack Obama want you to
think that America has a malignant, systemic problem of mostly white
police departments unfairly targeting blacks, while somehow also keeping
many blacks from becoming cops themselves. From that same timeworn
narrative they’d have us all believe that any and all troubles faced by
any black person today are, and always will be, attributable to some
feature of the existence of white people on this planet throughout
history. This carefully orchestrated mass-hallucination has many names,
among them the modern sophists’ favorites: ‘disparate impact doctrine’
and ‘critical race theory.’
Despite even the breakthrough Supreme Court ruling in Ricci v.
DeStefano several years ago, the race-hustlers keep doubling-down,
aggressively keeping the jive alive with much help from the eager
energies of millions of willing white liberals. No matter whether
intentional discrimination is proven not to have taken place in hiring
processes, school discipline rates & admissions, housing, law
enforcement outcomes, you name it, so-called progressives say it is
unfairly discriminatory if all results are not in direct proportion to
minority percentages among the total U.S. population(except when blacks
come out ahead, that is). It’s all a recipe for bizarre contortions of
policy and absurd public statements by officials.
It’s gotten so bad that even the formerly righteous and rebellious
Tea Party gadfly, senator Rand Paul, has been corrupted into just
another quivering, politically correct coward, out of fear of being seen
as a racist: He now positions himself seeking the diversity gestapo’s
stamp of approval, shamelessly pandering to blacks, saying all kinds of
ridiculously dishonest things about our criminal justice system in
regards to how it supposedly treats blacks unfairly. Yes, Rand Paul and
others are lying when they cite bogus studies about race, crimes such
as illegal drug use, and law enforcement/sentencing.
Is it unfair that car insurance companies charge relatively
inexperienced, hormone-crazed young male drivers (of all races) higher
rates than more sedate and steady middle-aged men? What about life and
health insurance policies costing those same comparatively sclerotic
middle-aged men more in premiums than for typically healthier young men?
Insurance rates are based on statistical probability, as we all know,
understand, and accept. Relative risk can be reasonably calculated,
even when complete information about specific individuals is
unavailable. They are based on demographic aggregate risk and
historical liability estimates, in accordance with actuarial analyses.
All of it, legitimately based on profiling.
Life is like that. Real life is exactly like that. We operate with
incomplete information all the time, particularly about humans that we
might encounter. Sometimes weighing the risks of safety or even
life-and-death in a matter of seconds, we really have no choice, but to
choose more often than not based on limited information and estimated
probability.
As I’ve pointed out in other columns, for many years now over 50% of
all the violent crime in our society continues to be done by black
people. Blacks make up only about 13-15% of our total population. Most
of those violent crimes, including murders, are done by an even smaller
segment of that minority, members of a mere 3% category of the
population: Young black males.
Of all people, none other than the original race-hustler Jesse
Jackson himself dropped his guard for a moment several years ago,
candidly admitting that he profiles young black men for his own personal
safety, because all else besides race being equal they are extremely more likely to be dangerous than white men of similar age.
Call it heuristics, stereotyping, bias, prejudice, bigotry, racism,
common sense, or profiling, unless and until we have more complete and
specific personal information about someone and their true character, we
have to get pretty good at judging books mostly by their covers if we
are to be spared the hazards of knockout-game attacks, muggings, thrill
kills, jihad beheadings, rape, and so forth.
Ever notice how those who lecture us against stereotyping, insisting that “you cant generalize about race,” and “you have to only look at specific individual character” don’t even seem to try
to practice what they preach? It may not even occur to Obama, Holder,
or the rest that they are themselves profiling whites, especially white
police, with their diatribes and accusations, not to mention the overall
attitude of most people when they categorically generalize that “whites did such-and-such to blacks” in the past. In one of his books, Obama refers to his maternal grandmother as a “typical white person,”
while complaining that she once admitted some fear of black men who
passed her on the street, and on occasion uttered ethnic stereotypes.
The truth is that people often have to address identifiable general
categories, as well as use the specific sense where appropriate, if any
earnest discussion is to be had on any topic at all. Race happens to be
just another topic where the use of the general and the specific must
be addressed.
Police investigating violent crimes generally begin the process with
the mindset that the perpetrator will most likely turn out to be a
male. Why? Because that’s just reality; women do also commit violent
crimes, but men do so overwhelmingly more often, and a criminal profile
developed while gathering earliest clues is usually that of a man. Is
that unfair to men? Of course not. Men don’t complain about it,
because we know that the profiling is warranted and required for the aim
of public safety, especially for women, children, the elderly, the
vulnerable.
What do Rand Paul or U.S. Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch have
to say about the fact that our prisons are overwhelmingly populated by
men, as opposed to women? Wouldn’t that be some kind of injustice,
according to them, men being “disparately impacted” by our laws, police,
and courts?
Instead of accurate profiling and media reporting & analysis
based on actual, egregiously lopsided rates of crime done by blacks, and
done particularly to whites, we get the parade of falsehoods around
cherry-picked racial scams a la Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and Eric
Garner.
Race-hoax abominations such as the Tawana Brawley and Duke LaCrosse
malicious frauds from years past are classics from the Sharpton/Jackson,
phony black grievance industry shakedown/liberal white guilt playbook.
The fake narrative always drives the mythical claims: Powerful,
abusive, oppressive white cops raped and tortured a black girl(proven
false); privileged white frat boys raped a black stripper at a house
party(proven false). The worst part about all the lies is that
meanwhile, in reality, actual FBI statistics over recent years show that
black men rape thousands and thousands of white women year after year,
yet white males virtually never rape black women. Obama and Holder publicly bemoan the fact that whites often lock
their car doors or grip their belongings tighter on an elevator when
around blacks, but of course you’ll never hear them empathizing with the
countless whites victimized by black predators across the land nor the
epidemic of savage black mob violence regularly occurring in our cities,
much of it racially-motivated. Instead, they’re more likely to give
the terrorists “of color” a pass, while crafting ever-more devious and
abusive ways to persecute whites with one-sided hate crime vendettas and
phony civil rights witch hunts in places like Ferguson, Missouri.and NYC
I’m sure it’s just the incompetence of the Obama regime not getting things properly filed.
Check it out: It’s common knowledge President
Obama signed an executive order directing the Department of Homeland
Security to forgive millions of illegal aliens for their past violations
of immigration law, right?
Wrong.
Today the National Archives and Records Administration, responsible
for such maintaining such filings, said no such executive order was ever
signed or filed, confirming WND’s report Wednesday.
A National Archives librarian, Jeffrey Hartley, made the confirmation in an email Thursday to WND.
“As I indicated, it would appear that there is not an Executive
Order stemming from the President’s remarks on November 20 on
immigration,” Hartley wrote.
Hartley said that neither of the executive orders Obama signed in Las
Vegas the day after his announcement fulfill his plan to defer
deportations and grant work permits to up to 5 million illegal aliens. “The only two documents that I have located are two Presidential
Memoranda, which are available from the White House site,” Hartley’s
email continued. “They can also be found in the November 26, 2014 issue
of the Federal Register.” Continue Reading on www.wnd.com ...
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Navy is revoking Bill Cosby's title of honorary
chief petty officer, saying allegations of sexual abuse made against
the comedian are serious and conflict with the Navy's core values.
Navy Secretary Ray Mabus and Master Chief Petty Officer Michael Stevens made the announcement Thursday in a statement.
Cosby
enlisted in the Navy in 1956 and served four years as a hospital
corpsman before being honorably discharged in 1960 as a 3rd Class Petty
Officer. The honorary title was presented to Cosby in 2011.
The 77-year-old Cosby has refused to answer questions about mounting accusations that he sexually abused several women.
NBC
recently scrapped a Cosby comedy that was under development, some of
his appearances have been canceled and he has resigned from Temple
University's board of trustees.
oped: Really now John boy...I'm thinking you are over your head and your job as Speaker of the House is above your pay grade abilities...you really should retire already as you have overstayed your welcome and we the smart people are really annoyed with you! Go back to your family hardware store and manage it... that is the limit of your abilities!
John Boehner and the rest of the House Republican Leadership just
unveiled their latest capitulation to Barack Obama's unlawful amnesty
decree. First, they want to call a
totally symbolic vote castigating Mr. Obama for his tyrannical and unconstitutional action.
And then... they want to call another vote to actually fund Obama's unconstitutional amnesty decree well into 2015.
Really? ... Are they serious? ... Do they honestly think
that the American people are stupid enough to believe that this
capitulation and total surrender is actually a plan to stop Barack
Obama's unlawful amnesty decree?
The Truth That No One In Washington Dares To Speak!
Why would John Boehner and GOP elites even bother to float a proposal to
fund an unconstitutional, dictatorial and imperial executive decree
well into next year?
Rush Limbaugh cut to the chase during his Tuesday broadcast:
"What this is about is the establishment
concocting an excuse where they don't have to stop Obama because they
don't want to, folks.
That's the only logical interpretation for all of this."
"They can't come, after all of this, and act like they are as eager for amnesty as Obama, but they are. We know it to be true."
Limbaugh went on to say: "Republicans need to
swallow hard and go all-in for amnesty, not just five million, but for
all of them. ... They just won a landslide election, and the intention
of the people that voted for 'em was to stop this. Well, the Republican
establishment apparently doesn't want to."
Now... if you're feeling discouraged by the deceptions and the trickery... DON'T. The truth of the matter is that politicians only attempt to deceive you because
THEY KNOW THEY NEED YOUR CONSENT.
The Cavalry Is Coming...
Your faxes and calls are also giving rank-and-file Republicans the courage to stand up to the elites in the GOP Leadership.
According to the Politico:"Senate
conservatives are beginning to badger House leaders over their plan to
fund the government and symbolically disapprove of the president's
immigration action... arguing that
the House needs to block funding for implementation of Obama's executive action now, not later."
And here's what some rank-and-file Republicans are saying in reference to Boehner's latest amnesty scheme:
"The Chairman of the Republican Party made a
promise to America on executive amnesty: 'We can't allow it to happen
and we won't let it happen… everything we can do to stop it we will.'
Unfortunately, the plan now being circulated in the House fails to meet
that test. ... [It] does not reject the central tenets of the
President's plan: work permits, Social Security and Medicare to 5
million illegal immigrants — reducing wages, jobs and benefits for
Americans. ... The President's action erases the laws Congress has
passed in order to implement laws Congress has refused to pass.
Now the President demands Congress fund his imperial decree and declare its own irrelevance." - Senator Jeff Sessions
"Make no mistake, sending a bill to the Senate
without first making an attempt to include defund language is telling
the American people that you support Obama's executive amnesty. That
would be a slap in the face to the voters who sent a message last month
by electing Republican majorities in Congress." -Senator David Vitter
"The major proposals I'm hearing about would
effectively fund Obama's amnesty program until March. We can't fund it
at all. I agree with other conservatives who have stated that the
president's amnesty scheme is illegal, which is why we should defund it
specifically and immediately while funding the rest of the government.
This can and should be done."- Congressman-elect David Brat, the man who defeated former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor
"It's impossible for us to tell the American
people that we're serious about this when we're not doing anything that
is serious." Congressman Raul Labrador
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and
every Member of the Republican Leadership in the United States Senate
and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternatively, send
your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the U.S.
Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives.
If I was the dude singing in that BS laden video, I’d move to Bora Bora
because he’s gonna regret that video for many moons. Be sure to hash tag
your thoughts at #HillaryCountrySong
oped: I totally believe the accusations...being that I worked for LAPD VanNuys Divison 1971-1974 I remember one of my Sgts discussing this case...it was hushed up at the higher levels of management... speculation being a cover up on pressure from the entertainment moguls! And I can honestly say after dealing with the bookings of numerous celebrities during this period of time from DUI,Drugs,perversion,disturbing the peace on and on...oh the stories I could tell...maybe another time I will!
Paige Young was the November 1968 Playmate of the Month and the magazine's centerfold
Bill Cosby was obsessed with Young who had caught his eye during his many visits to the glitzy Playboy Club
She was 30 when she took a .38 caliber pistol and shot herself in the head
In
a scene reminiscent of a 1970s B-movie,Young's friend and former model
Melanie Myers found Paige's lifeless body lying on a blood soaked
American flag on her double bed
‘The cops had Paige’s suicide note and read some of it to me,’ Myers recalls
‘The whole thing was about her anger towards the men who she believed had chewed her up and spat her out'
Passed around by dozens of Hollywood leading men over a decade former Playboy model Paige Young had become damaged goods.
When she turned 30 in 1974 her star had faded and she felt used, abused and unwanted by the Hollywood establishment.
And
in an astonishing tale of tragedy a MailOnline investigation can today
reveal the truth behind this American beauty’s demise.
Anguish: Paige Young – Playboy Playmate of the Month in November 1968 –
shot herself in the head in a bid she thought would send a powerful
message to the men who had tormented her for so long. She signed this
photo for her dear friend, DJ Jonny King
Besties: Bill Cosby and Hugh Hefner are longtime friends. Cosby was
obsessed with Young who had caught his eye during his many visits to the
glitzy Playboy Club where she worked on Hollywood’s Sunset strip
‘Paige always seemed in a stupor, a daze, like he was controlling her.
All I remember is that their relationship wasn’t healthy,' says Tamara
Green, herself a victim of Cosby's
We have
learned that Young – Playboy Playmate of the Month in November 1968 –
shot herself in the head in a bid she thought would send a powerful
message to the men who she believed had tormented her for so long.
Last week it emerged that one of her tormentors may have been legendary comedian Bill Cosby.
Young’s
name was mentioned in media reports along with the dozens of women who
have made shocking allegations of rape and sexual assault against the
comic.
Very little was known of Young and Cosby’s encounter but her story is all the more intriguing given her death.
Now MailOnline can reveal that Cosby in fact dated Young for months at the height of her fame.
One of Cosby’s victims, attorney Tamara Green, knew Paige from modeling circles and recalls seeing the pair together.
Tamara Green recalls that she ran into Paigewhile in El Paso, Texas around 1970 and learned she was dating Bill Cosby.
'I was there seeing my boyfriend and Paige called me and said Bill was on tour and she was travelling with him.
‘They
picked me up at my friend’s house and I remember sitting in the back of
a stretched black limo with them both and Bill wanted to score some
drugs.
‘I called around and found a bag of pot some place on the edge of El Paso.
‘Paige
was in to her drugs and Bill wanted to get her some, she was along on
the trip like his pet dog, she was a very subdued person, more like moon
on the water in terms of her personality.
‘They were clearly well acquainted with each other, it didn’t seem like a new thing. As far as I know they dated for a while.
‘Paige
always seemed in a stupor, a daze, like he was controlling her. All I
remember is that their relationship wasn’t healthy.’
'Paige
was a young thing who was very much taken advantage of by the men of
Hollywood, she was intelligent and talented, it's a tragedy what
happened to her.'
Cosby
– whom has recently become the subject of at least 17 sex attack
allegations dating back to the late 60s and 70s – was obsessed with
Young who had caught his eye during his many visits to the glitzy
Playboy Club where she worked on Hollywood’s Sunset strip.
Cosby was also a regular at the Playboy Mansion in Los Angeles as he and Hugh Hefner began working on many projects together.
Young was found dead on April 7, 1974 in her West Hollywood apartment.
In a scene reminiscent of a 1970s B-movie the model’s lifeless body was
discovered lying on a blood soaked American flag on her double bed
Continue Reading...a long article but worth the read:
Before anyone jumps the gun and suggests that I’m blaming Barack Obama for the death of Eric Garner, read on. I’m not.
As New York City prepares for protests — hopefully peaceful — after the grand jury’s decision not to indict in the death of Eric Garner, it’s worth a look at how we got here.
Garner reportedly had many prior arrests,
which means that he was known to the NYPD and may have been known to
the officers on the scene who took him down the day he died, July 17,
2014.
Why did they decide to take him down in the first place? That’s not clear even in the video. The video
of his death is unfortunately too short, and starts after the
confrontation has already started. The narrator says he is being “beaten
up” just for “breaking up a fight,” but that appears to be inaccurate.
Garner starts off in the video showing anger that the police have
confronted him repeatedly, over time, not just that day. He does not
appear to be threatening anyone, and according to reports had in fact
just stopped a fight between other people. So it’s not clear why the
police elected to use force on him. A citation would probably have
sufficed.
But a citation for what?
Garner was reportedly selling “loosies,” individual cigarettes taken out of their original packaging. That’s a crime?
Yep. Since 2010, that’s a crime, sayeth the unaccountable bureaucrats at the Food and Drug Administration.
An FDA rule issued on June 22, 2010 — well within the Obama era,
under a president who has unleashed bureaucracy on the entire country —
mandates that individual cigarettes cannot be sold without their
original packaging. You must not sell an unhealthy product that everyone
knows is unhealthy unless it’s still in the polluting box that it
originally came in.
If you sell cigarettes, you must comply with the following bullet points. Note the bold.
Check photo ID of everyone appearing under age 27 who attempts to purchase cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, or smokeless tobacco.
Only sell cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, and smokeless tobacco to anyone age 18 or older. **
Only sell cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, and smokeless tobacco in a direct, face-to-face exchange. ***
Do NOT break open cigarette or smokeless tobacco packages to sell products in smaller amounts.
Do NOT sell cigarette packages containing fewer than 20 cigarettes.
Do NOT sell single cigarettes, also called “loosies”.
Do NOT give away free samples of cigarettes.
Do NOT give away free samples of smokeless tobacco except from a “qualified adult-only facility.”
Do NOT sell flavored cigarettes or flavored cigarette tobacco (other than menthol).
* This is only a summary of the laws. For the full list of federal laws, visit: www.fda.gov/BreakTheChain.
Selling and buying loosies is about avoiding taxes. Garner was being a
fringe entrepreneur. That’s not to say that he’s a hero. He appears to
have been a guy on the make. What he was doing was illegal and he knew
that. None of that justifies the force used on him, but it’s important
to keep in mind that the 43 year old was well overweight and actually
died not of choking, but of a heart attack. Obviously the heart attack
was influenced by the arrest. Could the police have predicted that
taking him down would end up killing him? Intent to kill doesn’t appear
to be in play in the video. That rules murder out. But there will be a
federal investigation.
The strongest charge that the grand jury could possibly have handed
down to the officer was some form of manslaughter or negligent homicide,
and that might have been appropriate. The force used looks excessive.
But the grand jury decided against that after reviewing the evidence,
which means a jury was even less likely to convict. That doesn’t mean
that they’re right. Seems like a marginal call either way. Seems like a
bad call for the police to take him down by force. I don’t see why they
couldn’t have given him a ticket, unless there are relevant events that
we don’t know about that happened prior to the video.
It also is a bad call to let the FDA start creating new crimes, but
President Obama has made a bad habit of turning the government loose on
the whole country, and then daring courts to stop him. He’s a terrible
president that way, and disrespects the rule of law and the rights of
individuals to have any kind of certainty where we all stand with
respect to the law at any given moment. Obama’s unleashing of the
bureaucracy is among his most detestable actions. The next president has
got to work with Congress to rein the unruly and power-hungry federal
bureaucracy back in, or we all really are going to become felons in one
way or another. We all will be subject to capricious and arbitrary law
enforcement, which is really lawlessness and oppression.
Eric Garner died protesting (or evading, take your pick) taxes, along
with violating the diktats of a bureaucratic government that has grown
too remote from the people and too oppressive not just over black men,
whose lives do matter and is among the reasons that the pro-life
movement exists, but over all Americans. We are all subjects to the
bureaucracy’s whims, and less and less true citizens as the bureaucracy
grows more powerful. Garner didn’t need to die for that, he shouldn’t
have died for that, but the officers involved aren’t guilty of murder.
May the protests remain peaceful. More:
Time to put the federal government in their place.
Check it out: In three weeks, Utah intends to seize control of 31.2 million
acres of its own land now under the control of the federal government.
At least, that’s the plan.
In an unprecedented challenge to federal dominance of Western state
lands, Utah Gov. Gary Herbert in 2012 signed the “Transfer of Public
Lands Act,” which demands that Washington relinquish its hold on the
land, which represents more than half of the state’s 54.3 million acres,
by Dec. 31.
So far, however, the federal government hasn’t given any indication
that it plans to cooperate. Still, state Rep. Ken Ivory, who sponsored
the legislation, isn’t deterred.
“That’s what you do any time you’re negotiating with a partner.
You set a date,” said Mr. Ivory. “Unfortunately, our federal partner has
decided they don’t want to negotiate in good faith. So we’ll move
forward with the four-step plan that the governor laid out.” In other words, there won’t be any escorting of federal
officials by state troopers to the eastern border. Instead, he said,
state officials will proceed with a program of education, negotiation,
legislation and litigation.
oped: Obviously Hillary's stint as Secretary of State put the proverbial coffin nail in her aspirations to become POTUS!
Hillary Speaks To Empty Seats At Georgetown
by Wochit
With
the midterms over and the next presidential cycle officially underway,
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke at Georgetown University
Wednesday morning to bundles of empty seats littered throughout the
auditorium.
In pictures, empty seats are shown empty seats littered throughout the auditorium.
In pictures, empty seats are shown throughout the balcony level of the
auditorium, with other empty seats shown in the lower level as well.
Clinton spoke to a foreign policy conference centered on “Security” and
“Inclusive Leadership,” according to the university.
The conference was held at the university’s famed Gaston Hall, which
includes the 750-seat auditorium Clinton spoke at Wednesday.
By Sean Piccoli
A former Pakistani ambassador to the United States who now lives in exile in the West told Newsmax TV
on Wednesday that trust between the two countries will always be
strained as long as the U.S. remains an ally of Pakistan's greatest
adversary: India.
"The big question for Pakistan always has been its relationship with
India," Husain Haqqani, a South and Central Asia scholar with the
Washington, D.C.-based Hudson Institute, told "MidPoint" host Ed
Berliner.
Note: Watch Newsmax TV now on DIRECTV Ch. 349 and DISH Ch. 223
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now
"India is not America's enemy," said Haqqani, "and therefore the United
States policies can never fully converge with Pakistan, which is totally
focused on India and its rivalry with it."
Haqqani, ambassador to the U.S. from 2008 to 2011, acknowledged that the
U.S. view of Pakistan focuses on the country's links to radical
Islamists and terror groups that despise the West. Pakistan, a Taliban
stronghold, was the last hiding place of fugitive 9/11 mastermind Osama
bin Laden.
"I have no doubt that there are many factions in Pakistan that are very
anti-American and cooperate with groups like ISIS and al-Qaida," he
said. "Whether the [Pakistani] government actually builds them up and
supports them to do that is still something that we all worry about."
Whatever the truth, "the fact remains that the Pakistani government does
tolerate a lot of jihadi groups for its regional influence and,
unfortunately, many of them have very close ties with groups that are
against the United States
But he argued that Islamabad's tolerance of jihadists is ultimately rooted in antipathy toward its neighbor.
India and Pakistan, both nuclear powers, have gone to war four times —
three of those conflicts over the disputed territories of Kashmir,
including military clashes in 1999. According to Haqqani, Pakistan finds
Muslim jihadis useful for destabilizing Hindu-dominated India.
Haqqani's estrangement from his homeland reflects another strain of
Pakistani intrigue: conflict between civilian leaders and the military.
Haqqani resigned as ambassador in 2011 after being accused of secretly
enlisting U.S. help to stop a military coup.
But forging closer U.S.-Pakistan ties doesn't mean a U.S. repudiation of
India; the goal instead is to persuade Islamabad — a recipient of
billions of U.S. foreign aid dollars — to change course and end the
enmity with New Delhi, said Haqqani.
"You should make sure that Pakistan tries to get away from its perennial
rivalry with India, that it pays attention to its own economy, and its
leaders stop pursuing a destructive path," he said. "If that
necessitates American to be a little tougher with Pakistan, that may
actually be in the interests of Pakistan."
They are still liberals and must be defeated.
Check it out: A “Special Report” panel tonight weighed in on the state of
conservative politics, but Charles Krauthammer said the real story isn’t
about the GOP.
“I do think that the press keeps trying to repeat the meme that the
great civil war story here is among Republicans […] the real story is
the split among the Democrats,” Krauthammer said. Krauthammer said that on one side, there’s Chuck Schumer and
his “savage attack” on everything President Barack Obama represents.
Elizabeth Warren is on the other end of the spectrum, and then there’s
Hillary Clinton in the middle, who Krauthammer said “can’t make up her
mind on anything.”
oped: I would suggest the Military go with the S & W M & P 357 mag or 40 cal....better knock down power than the 9mm!
By Matt Bradwell WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 (UPI) -- The Pentagon
announced it will actively seek a new manufacturing contract to replace
Beretta as the primary sidearm of the United States military.
Gun manufacture Smith & Wesson and a division of General Dynamics
have already announced plans to enter a jointly-produced firearm based
on Smith & Wesson's M&P, an already popular polymer pistol used
by law enforcement agencies around the world.
"The strategic partnership between our two companies provides us with
a tremendous opportunity to support our military with a
state-of-the-art sidearm, namely our M&P pistol," Smith & Wesson
President and Chief Executive Officer James Deb said of the joint venture.
A potential military contract has lasting historic implications
for the gun model chosen. The Army first contracted the 9mm Beretta M9
in 1985. Before the M9, the Colt M1911 served as the Army's
standard-issue sidearm for nearly 90 years.
In addition to the finacial security of a long-term government
contract, producers of the military's most common pistol also become
cultural icons.
According to CNNMoney, "Guns chosen by the military achieve cult status, used as iconic weapons in James Bond and other action movies, and become highly desirable among civilian gun owners too."
Indeed, the "lethal weapon" carried by fictional Detective Martin Riggs in Richard Donner's Lethal Weaponwas a 9mm Beretta.
The Pentagon will formally issue the Modular Handgun System
solicitation in January. Beretta has announced it will also enter the
competition to retain its title as the primary U.S. military sidearm.
by: Dave Hodges History has shown that most of the brutal dictators of the past have
share two or three mental illnesses. These illnesses include
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), Paranoid Personality Disorder
(PPD) and Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Given the direction of
the country, it is legitimate to ask whether or not this President is indeed mentally ill.
In my professional opinion, any combination of two of these mental
illnesses would prevent a President from discharging his duties as
prescribed by the Constitution of the United States. The Twenty-Fifth Amendment-Section Four
"Whenever the Vice President and a majority
of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such
other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President
pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of
Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable
to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President
shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting
President…"
If the President could be shown to mentally ill, under the 25th
Amendment he could be removed from office. With the publicly available
information, and based upon my training and experience in mental health
diagnostics, I have conducted a mental health status exam of this
President.
The Mental Illnesses of Dictators
Before analyzing President Obama according to these criteria, based
upon observed public behaviors, please allow me to make a few general
observations with regard to three conditions. Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) sufferers believe that they are entitled to special
privilege and that the rules of society apply to others but not to them. Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD)
individuals are people who are unusually suspicious in situations in
which most people would not be concerned. They frequently change allies
and lack stable relationships in their lives. Finally, Anti-Social Personality Disorder (ASPD)
people are a combination of what we used to call a sociopath and a
psychopath. These people are capable of doing great harm to another
human being without feeling any empathy and remorse. This is the central
element in the personality structure of a person who would commit
genocide against their own people.
The remainder of this article explores if the current President is indeed mentally ill based upon the universally agreed upon diagnostic criteria as set forth by The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM).
Narcissistic Personality Disorder
In order for a person to be diagnosed with narcissistic personality
disorder (NPD) they must meet five or more of the following symptoms:
Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
Believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be
understood by, or should associate with, other special or
high-status people (or institutions)
Requires excessive admiration
Has a very strong sense of entitlement, e.g., unreasonable
expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance
with his or her expectations
Is exploitative of others, e.g., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
Lacks empathy, e.g., is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
Regularly shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
Five out eight of these symptoms are sufficient cause to warrant a
positive diagnosis. Obama is one of the most self-righteous people on
the planet and we have numerous quotes which exemplify this point.
"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming America."
Very few Americans had any idea what Obama meant by that quote. Six
years into his presidency, it is clear that Obama meant to turn this
country into an impoverished nation devoid of civil liberties. This is
the ultimate expression of the communist legacy that he is trying to
build.
This president does not tolerate normal criticism which comes with
the territory of being a president. He has consistently sponsored
legislation which inhibits the constitutionally guaranteed rights of
legitimate protest with his support of the NDAA. This is the ultimate in
haughtiness.
Obama exhibits extreme signs of feeling a sense of entitlement. His
incessant misuse of the power of executive orders provides prima fascia
evidence that "his will be done" and that he is above the law with regard to violating the constitutional rights of the American people.
Obama is an extremely exploitative person. However, in the grand
scheme of politics, it is a needed survival skill to take advantage of
people in one's climb to the top of the political world. Therefore, is
Obama exploitative by nature, or, do the political realities of his
position dictate the emergence of this trait as a survival skill? The
jury is out on this one.
"You did not build that business." Remember that insulting
and impersonal slap in the face of every small business owner in
America? This statement is reflective of Obama's view that nobody is
bigger than "my" government.
The President's statement in which he bragged he was really good at
killing people by using drones speaks to his extreme level of
insensitivity.
Of the eight traits associated with this disorder, I see seven of the
eight with the eighth trait not being supported due to a lack of
evidence.
President Obama clearly suffers from NPD. People with NPD can indeed
function to some degree in society. However, they often make very
ineffective leaders because they almost always put their needs ahead of
the needs of the people they purport to serve.
Paranoid Personality Disorder
To make a positive diagnosis for this disorder, I would have to
possess intimate details about the life of Obama. Unfortunately, that
information is not readily available. Here are the traits of PPD.
Suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are exploiting, harming, or deceiving him or her
Is preoccupied with unjustified doubts about the loyalty or trustworthiness of friends or associates
Is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear that the information will be used maliciously against him or her
Reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign remarks or events
Persistently bears grudges (i.e., is unforgiving of insults, injuries, or slights)
Perceives attacks on his or her character or reputation that are not
apparent to others, and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack
Has recurrent suspicions, without justification, regarding fidelity of spouse or sexual partner
Certainly, Obama's known childhood experiences could be explored as a
baseline of this part of the examination; what childhood experiences?
Exactly! Who is his high school basketball coach? Do his teachers
remember him? Who in the world is he? When you couple this hidden
childhood with that of living with Frank Marshall Davis, undoubted
scarred him and left him with feelings of extreme abandonment. This
factor, alone, could prove to be the breeding ground for PPD.
As I have previously covered, I know that most of his first-degree
relatives were involved in MK Ultra. Certainly the breeding ground for
PPD is in place given his unstable background.
Since we lack highly detailed information about his personal life, it
is difficult to affirmatively diagnose Obama with this disorder, except
for one thing. Since becoming president, Obama has fired nearly 260
command level officers from the military. In contrast, President Bush
fired two. This would be the expected actions of a highly paranoid
individual in that he would dismantle the command structure of military
in such a significant manner. Although I cannot point to the fact that
Obama has a requisite number of traits which determines that he is
suffering from PPD, I think it is highly likely.
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Of all the mental illnesses we could examine with regard to a
leader's propensity to commit extreme violence against his people, this
would be the most concerning of all the mental illnesses. This disorder
also happens to be where Obama has exhibited extreme pathological
behavior with regard to this affliction. The traits of ASPD are as
follows:
Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors
as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
Reckless disregard for safety of self or others
Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
Lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or
rationalizing having hurt an individual. They may display a glib,
superficial charm and can be quite voluble and verbally facile (e.g.,
using technical terms or jargon that might impress someone who is
unfamiliar with the topic). Lack of empathy, inflated self-appraisal,
and superficial charm are features that have been commonly included in
traditional conceptions of psychopathy and may be particularly
distinguishing of Antisocial Personality Disorder in prison or forensic
settings where criminal, delinquent, or aggressive acts are likely to be
nonspecific. These individuals may also be irresponsible and
exploitative in their sexual relationships (see the work of Jerome Corsi
in this regard).
We know that this administration fired two senior command officers
and prevented them from attempting to rescue Ambassador Stevens and his
bodyguards, at Benghazi, while the attack was in progress. We also know
that he and other senior level members of his administration watched by
drone as the events unfolded and culminated in the deaths of Stevens and
his team. As I have documented on this website, the evidence points to
the fact that Stevens was the conduit which connected Obama to the
arming of al-Qaeda in support of the Libyan and Syrian rebels.
Obama's use of drones to kill not only foreign nationals, but three
American citizens, speaks to his depraved indifference to human life.
The fact that he is continuing the war in Afghanistan, despite his
campaign promises to the contrary, speaks to his absolutely reckless
disregard for human life. People have been killed by drones as they
attend weddings, babies die in their mother's arms, and children are
maimed and killed by these machines and Obama brags that he is good at
killing people with drones.
Obama has extreme superficial charm. After all, he twice fooled a
nation of sheep with his manufactured demeanor. Obama is highly
impulsive. His assistants do not know if he will attend an intelligence
briefing or will he be on the golf course.
President Obama has never held a real job. He has served as a
community agitator (err community activist), a state senator, a less
than a one-term US Senator and then of course, a President. Where is his
employment history? The bottom line is that this President has never
held a regular job.
The President has engaged in repeated acts of lying and breaking the
law as witnessed by the events at Benghazi, the NSA spy scandal, the IRS
harassment scandal, Obama's spying on AP reporters, Fast and Furious gun running to the Mexican drug cartels, etc. This administration has been little more than one great big criminal enterprise.
President Obama's conduct in the handling of the Michael Brown crisis in Ferguson
in which he clearly and intentionally exacerbated the crisis by
dwelling on the "communities of color and their strained relationships
with law enforcement". As true, or inaccurate as this statement was, it
served to incite violence from those who were already upset.
Presidential speeches are measured and weighted for their psychological
effect on the public. Obama knew exactly what he was doing.
The sum total of Obama's actions demonstrate a willful disregard for
the welfare of others. ASPD individuals frequently use aliases. Do you
think that "Barry," the student attending Occidental College, would ever
do such a thing?
Of the seven traits listed above, one would have to claim the
presence of four of the seven traits in order to justify a diagnosis of
ASPD. I see six of seven traits being exhibited by President Obama. His
superficial charm, his lack of remorse for his heinous acts and his
inability to learn from his mistakes, unquestionably cast him in the
role of being an ASPD individual.
Conclusion
Obama may or not be paranoid, although his treatment of the military
would indicate that he is. Unquestionably, President Obama is suffering
from NPD and ASPD. This is very concerning because a leader with NPD
would not hesitate to put his needs ahead of the country that he is
leading. This fact, combined with his definitive diagnosis, of an ASPD
sufferer means that a person with the combination of these two traits
would not hesitate to carry out acts of extreme violence against
individuals and groups perceived as being a threat to the authority and
position of President Obama.
We, indeed, have much to be concerned over and based upon the
evidence, I would encourage the Cabinet to invoke Section Four of the
Twenty-Fifth Amendment. This President is not capable of discharging his
duties under the disabilities clause.
Source
I for one am really getting tired of all the attacks on Law Enforcement about profiling...hello the terminology and practice of profiling actually came into being mid 1970's The FBI started paying attention to reports coming in re: how Law enforcement officers established probable cause in order to make a righteous stop on a person of interest...I worked the Mexican border as a Customs Patrol Officer 1975-1986...LE officers working the streets must go on gut feeling/experience substantiated by given facts in order to effect probable cause for a suspected stop...now how does one go about that you say?...Well how about a example to lead one to a conclusion...working the border the midnight shift I see two vehicles leaving the area of the border...one vehicle is a family driving a mini-motorhome...heading northbound on the highway within the speed limits...
The second vehicle was observed leaving the border area from a side road...it is a older large trunk low rider vehicle with obvious air shocks...it is driven by a lone Mexican male ( not the only factor but important as most smugglers are in fact lone Mexican males in the 20's range) and entered the highway with lights blacked out...now who do you think a law enforcement officer is going to put a priority on...only one stop is possible being that budget restrictions and lack of manpower to stop both vehicles?Yes you guessed it...profiling will play a big part and result in a righteous stop,search,seizure and arrest...just a proven fact Jack!
This also applies today as it did yesterday before the ACLU,SPLC and the progressive looney left party came into being! This also applies to terrorism/gang activity as well, who ya gonna look at a family,a nun,a hottie in a bikini a old white fart obviously doing normal things or the proven fact that most if not all terrorists are in fact Middle East of the Islam faith and most gang members are for the most part ' 13' (Mexicans) or (Blacks ) 'African Americans' as the cripts & bloods etc!
I could go on and on with examples...however I am sure you get the picture YES?
The FBI way taught at the FBI academy...hello !
Now someone please tell me just what part does not Eric Holder and Barack Obama get...oh wait they are part of the problemo neither was ever vetted properly...HELLO! #FBI do your damn job already, profile these two criminals...leave the rest of us alone already!
