Pages

Monday, September 18, 2017

North Korea Just Revealed Their Shocking End Game


What is Kim Jong Un up to?
World leaders, top military officials and intelligence analysts across the globe are trying to figure out why he is pushing the world to the brink of nuclear war.
Now one CIA agent revealed North Korea’s horrifying end game.
The past three administrations have kicked the can down the road with North Korea.
Now Donald Trump is trying to bring about a peaceful solution to a problem previous American Presidents tried to pretend didn’t exist.
But will North Korea ever be coaxed into giving up their nuclear weapons?
One expert says the terrifying answer is “no.”
And the reason is Kim Jong Un wants a nuclear weapon that can strike anywhere in the United States.

Town Hall reported:
Dr. Sue Mi Terry, a Columbia University professor and former senior CIA analyst on North Korea, said that Pyongyang will never give up its nuclear weapons. Their aim, she said, is to be able to strike anywhere in the United States with a nuclear weapon.
“What they said is they are going to complete their nuclear program. Perfect their nuclear arsenal,” she said Sunday on Fox News. “They are not going to stop until they get there, get to the point where they can attack anywhere in the United States with a nuclear test. They are not going to give up nuclear weapons. Talking is fine but we have to be realistic. They are not going to give up nuclear weapons ever.”
In fact, North Korea appears to be preparing for another ballistic missile test.

The Telegraph reported:
“North Korea has reportedly moved an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) towards its west coast, as the US said Pyongyang was “begging” for war.
North Korea had been spotted moving a rocket that appeared to be an ICBM towards its west coast, South Korea’s Asia Business Daily, citing an unidentified source, reported on Tuesday.
The rocket started moving on Monday and was spotted moving only at night to avoid surveillance, the report said.
South Korea’s defence ministry, which warned on Monday that North Korea was ready to launch an ICBM at any time, said they were unable to confirm the contents of the report.”
In response, United States Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley declared North Korea was “begging for war” and demanded the body impose harsh measures and exhaust all diplomatic means to resolve the crisis.

Politico reported:
“North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un is “begging for war,” U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said Monday at an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council.
Haley said that the U.S. does not want war, but that when “a rogue regime has a nuclear weapon and an ICBM pointed at you, you don’t take steps to lower your guard.”
Can the United States stop Kim Jong Un before he achieves his goal of developing the capability to annihilate any city in the United States?
We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this story.

Source: http://www.americanpatriotdaily.com

Saturday, September 16, 2017

“Pocahontas” Actress Slams Trump, Then Pocahontas’ Real Descendant Steps up

https://conservativetribune.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Fake-Indian-vs-Real-Indian-592x331.jpg
by:

During a recent interview, the actress who voiced the lead character in the animated 1995 film “Pocahontas” claimed the real Pocahontas, a Native American woman who became a legend after saving the life of a captive Englishman in 1607, would have disliked President Donald Trump.
“Do I think Pocahontas would be a fan of Trump?” actress Irene Bedard asked Sky News rhetorically during her interview. “Oh no! No.”
Oh really?

It turns out Sky News also interviewed Debbie “White Dove” Porreco, a Native American who just happens to be a decedent of the real Pocahontas, as noted in a profile of her published a couple years back by the Palm Beach Daily News.
“If Pocahontas were alive today, she’d be very proud of Trump,” she told Sky News.
“I’m a supporter of Donald Trump because he’s a go-getter,” she added. “He sees what he needs to do and does it.”


What a stunning contrast. Not shockingly, the disagreements between these two women — one a real Native American, and the other a Hollywood actress and elitist hack who only plays a Native American in film — didn’t stop there.
“I know that he uses Pocahontas sometimes with Elizabeth Warren,” Porreco said, referencing the president’s nickname for Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who to this day continues to pretend to be a Native American. “He said, ‘Well does that offend you when I use that?’ And I told him no, it doesn’t offend me.”

Bedard disagreed, arguing the president’s nickname for Warren counts as “misogyny and bullying and name-calling.”
Likewise, whereas Bedard stated only Native Americans reserve the right to speak out against illegal immigration, Porreco made it clear she believes this right belongs to every American citizen.
“I agree totally with him,” she said, alluding to the president’s tough stance on illegal immigration. “You know, you get the ones out that are committing crimes.”
What an intelligent and reasonable woman. I wish I could say the same about Bedard, but she clearly has no clue what she’s talking about.

Porreco, on the other hand, understands the truth loud and clear.
“Just like Pocahontas was a heroine, President Trump is gonna be our hero,” she concluded.
True that.
Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about the praise this real descendant of Pocahontas has for our president.
What do you think about the snooty Hollywood actress' claims? Scroll down to comment below!

Friday, September 15, 2017

The end of Hillary Clinton’s empire started Monday (finally!)


by:Frank Holmes 

A lowly state judge may be the one to finally blow Hillary Clinton’s e-mail scandal wide open — by ordering an investigation into three of her closest associates for destroying reams of evidence.
On Monday, Judge Paul F. Harris Jr. of the Fifth Circuit Court in Maryland ordered the state to investigate why Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, and David E. Kendall deleted 33,000 of Clinton’s e-mails while they were serving as her attorneys.
“There are allegations of destroying evidence,” Judge Harris told the courtroom on September 11. “The court is ordering bar counsel to investigate.”
The order came because of a lawsuit brought by Ty Clevenger, an anti-corruption crusader from Texas.
Clevenger says he’s writing a book on how lawyers who have friends in high places get favorable breaks – and how they use that political influence to distort justice. He said the three Clinton lawyers getting by with this kind of misconduct is exhibit A.


Clevenger says he’s amazed that Mills, Samuelson, and Kendall have skated this long. “My thesis is: If you are a politically prominent attorney, you are held to a different standard,” he said.
If Hillary’s attorneys are found guilty of wrongdoing, all three could lose their license to practice law in the state of Maryland.
The rules of the American Bar Association say that someone should be warned over misconduct “only in cases of minor misconduct, when there is little or no injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession, and when there is little likelihood of repetition by the lawyer.”

When you’re talking about the Benghazi cover-up, that doesn’t apply.
“I just think this is a rather easy decision,” to order an inquiry into the three shady lawyers “at this point,” Harris said. The investigation will be conducted by the Attorney Grievance Commission in the state of Maryland — a left-wing state dominated by the Democratic Party and liberal Republicans.
Still, Judge Harris’s order is a landmark for the Hillary e-mail server scandal — and the secrets those thousands of deleted e-mails hold.

The Fifth Circuit Court oversees three counties in Maryland, but Harris has done more to bring Hillary’s lawyers to justice than FBI Director James Comey.
Hillary’s decision to use a homebrew e-mail server while serving of Secretary of State left classified information vulnerable to hackers and foreign intelligence agencies.
Rather than come clean, her campaign deleted the e-mails, made them unrecoverable by wiping the server clean with BleachBit software, and smashed cell phones with hammers – not the actions of an innocent person.

The server scandal is one of the issues that contributed to the charisma-free candidate losing the 2016 presidential election. “The most important of the mistakes I made was using personal e-mail,” Clinton told Jane Pauley on “CBS Sunday Morning” the day before the hearing.
But then she blamed the media for the negative coverage. “It was presented in such a negative way, and I never could get out from under it and it never stopped,” she whined.
Since the election, she has also blamed her loss on Russia, misogyny, Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, WikiLeaks, fake news, James Comey, Twitter bots, the Democratic Party campaign apparatus, the New York Times, Netflix, and a growing list of actors instead of her inept campaign and poor decisions.

Clinton may have lost the White House, but she and her cadre of attorneys have never faced the music for their corrupt actions. Last July, Comey said that Hillary had mishandled classified material…but he wouldn’t prosecute her because he couldn’t prove intent.
Clevenger’s lawsuit and Harris’s order could finally change all that.
The Horn News will be watching to see what evidence is uncovered… and whether Hillary’s supporters will be willing to take the fall for her, start singing about their old boss and her potentially illegal actions…
…or if they unexpectedly “commit suicide” under mysterious circumstances.