Pages

Monday, February 8, 2016

Russia Has Just Released A Video Depicting Obama As…THE DEVIL – You Want To See This!


obama-satan

by:Terresa Monroe-Hamilton 

Truth in advertising. The Russians have a point, just not entirely for the reasons they give. They are running a giant billboard with a video of Obama morphing into a devil on it in Moscow. The Russians are not known for subtlety. The video was evidently projected onto multiple buildings there Friday morning. The message… welcome to the Hague Tribunal 2016, the international court for criminals. I’m torn… the communists in Russia are stone cold enemies of ours, but right is right and part of me cheers this. The video starts off with Obama looking like his evil self and a message that he won the Nobel Peace Prize. Then he starts to morph into a devil as he eats the flags of countries where he is accused of killing people. The death toll keeps rising as the video goes on and Obama just keeps being depicted more and more as a fanged demon. If the horns fit dude. 

From TheBlaze:
A video depicting President Barack Obama as a murderous devil was reportedly projected onto multiple buildings in Moscow, Russia, Friday morning, along with a message that said he needs to be tried in international court.
The video was released on the YouTube channel “60sec.” The video shows different projections while a clock counts down from 60 seconds.
When the projections begin, Obama’s face is normal. But as they continue to play, his face and head transform to appear more devil-like, while he eats the flags of various countries where the United States is allegedly responsible for killing people.
The projections then show the number of people that the U.S. is allegedly at fault for killing. The video shows the projection on several different buildings.
Toward the end of the video, the video projects an alleged death toll of 561,832 and concludes with the caption: “Obama, welcome to the Hague tribunal in 2016.”

One of the buildings projected on was the building next to the British Embassy there in Moscow. Like I said, not very subtle. The Russian News Service, which first reported news of the video, offered a possible explanation of the projections. “Coup in Iraq, Syria, Ukraine and other countries have often led to civil war, the killing of civilians and other war crimes. According to many experts, they were organized by a direct or indirect participation of American political consultants and financial aid Western NGOs, as well as directly on the orders of the US president.” Russia is big on blaming the US for the world’s woes… although Obama is to blame for a lot of it, that is true. But it’s not just Obama they hate. They hate America with a passion. Late last month, activists unfurled a three-story banner across from the US Embassy in Moscow that showed Obama above the word “KILLER,” then projected the words “Obama killer” onto the American statehouse. Increased hateful propaganda always come before war. Always.

https://youtu.be/zGNnAgu9hF4

 

Mitch McConnell Sponsors Bill that Would Open Up Use of US Military Force to Obama Anywhere at His Discretion, both Foreign & Domestic

Identity Crisis: Marco Rubio's Straddle Between 'Conservative' And ...


oped: Mitch ~Marco I do believe it would be wise to hold off on this Bill until Barry Barack Hussein Obama is out of office..#JustSaying   

Obama_I-will-stand-with-Muslims_2015-02-25_PP 

by:
It's about to get real friends! In a stunning move at the end of January, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pushed through a bill that claims to "authorize the use of United States Armed Forces [AUMF] against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and its associated forces." The problem is that the bill is not only unconstitutional (not a declaration of war), but is also open-ended, not restricting where those forces can be used. As usual, they are covering what they are doing by advancing the idea that it is an effort to defeat Islamic terrorists.   

According to the bill, the Congress "Authorizes the President to use all necessary and appropriate force to defend U.S. national security against the threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), its associated forces, organizations, and persons, and any successor organizations."   

Additionally, it adds, "(1) Congress declares that this joint resolution is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution, and (2) nothing in this joint resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution."
It also says that the Executive is to report to Congress at least every 60 days on matters relevant to this joint resolution.

Sarah Mimms reported on January 21 at Defense One:
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell offered members a snow-weekend surprise late Wednesday night: Quietly teeing up a debate on the legal underpinning for the fight against ISIS.

After months of worrying that such a resolution—known as an authorization for the use of military force—would tie the next president's hands, McConnell's move to fast-track the measure surprised even his top deputy, Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, who was unaware that McConnell had set up the authorization.

"He did?" Cornyn asked National Journal on Thursday morning.

The AUMF put forward by McConnell would not restrict the president's use of ground troops, nor have any limits related to time or geography. Nor would it touch on the issue of what to do with the 2001AUMF, which the Obama administration has used to attack ISIS despite that authorization's instructions to use force against those who planned the 9/11 terrorist attacks. By contrast, the legal authority put forward by the administration last February wouldn't authorize "enduring offensive ground combat operations" and would have ended three years after enactment, unless reauthorized.
The bill has 5 usual suspect RINO co-sponsors:
  • Daniel Coats (R-IN)
  • Joni Ernst (R-IA)
  • Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
  • Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
  • Marco Rubio (R-FL)
The problem is that it's open ended and that the reality of what Senator Lindsey Graham, who I'm ashamed to say is a senator from my state, is that even America is now the potential battleground, with citizens who can be targeted under the War Powers Resolution without due process of law.
Don't get me wrong, I have absolutely no affection for Islam, the Islamic State or any part of that antichrist, anti-American system. However, this appears to me to be an undermining of the Constitution in order to put more power in the Executive Branch by using the threat of terrorism.

The Constitution has a remedy and that remedy is the militia. We are the ones to deal with that on our soil. The Constitution also provides for authority to be invested in Congress to declare war, not write resolution that allows for the executive to do whatever he wants with a military apart from that declaration.
Don Stewart, McConnell's spokesman, said Thursday in an email to Defense One that the new AUMF, "is not the one the [p]resident asked for" and "not one that would tie the [p]resident's hands."

Several senators claimed they were shocked that McConnell wanted to fast-track authorization.
Senator Jeff Flake had advanced a limited AUMF indicated the move by McConnell was more political.
"We need to pass one—we don't need to just make a political statement," he said.

Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker said, "I'm in the same place that I've been—and that is I believe the administration has the authority to do what they're doing," he added. "They believe they have the authority to do what they're doing. If a consensus develops and I believe that something constructive relative to us dealing with ISIS might come out of it then certainly I'd be glad to consider it."
What kind of talk is that? If the criminal administration believes they have the authority to do what they are doing, then it's ok? Isn't that the same nonsense we heard from former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta when he was questioned about our involvement in toppling Qaddafi in Libya? He didn't point to the Constitution. He pointed to an international consensus and claimed authority!

"This is the right thing," said Lindsey Graham. "This is the right infrastructure to have."
"If our Democratic friends don't want to give this president and other presidents the ability to go after ISIS without limitation to geography, time and means—be on the record," he added.
I'll be on the record Lindsey. This is ridiculous. You are attempting to engage in warfare against an ideology, against an army of ideologues you can't even identify correctly. You are in bed with Islamic terrorists and have been a full supporter of arming, training and funding these enemies of America, and now America should trust your judgment about empowering Obama, or any other president, in this limitless manner? And don't say you haven't because you and Senator John McCain have been caught red handed doing it! What in the world have you been smoking?

Kit Daniels at Infowars also referenced that the timing of McConnell's introduction of this bill is suspect as it occurred on "on a Friday as an unprecedented blizzard slams the northeast U.S., including Washington, D.C."
In other words, McConnell figured it wouldn't get in the news cycle because of the weekend and the weather, and for the most part he was right.
This bill is currently in committee, but according to Govtrack, it has a 42% chance of being enacted or passed. My fellow Americans, this is 42% more than it should have.

 

Sunday, February 7, 2016

#OregonStandOff. Note to all the Looney Left attacking Patriots...

militia
Please be advised I cannot speak for all the militia groups who participated in the stand off...I can only speak for  #OathKeepers who called for calm on both sides of the debate.
Note: OathKeepers are made up of active as well as retired Miltary, LE, First Responders and their supporters as well as Constitutional Sheriffs also known as Sage Brush Sheriffs...all are well versed in US History/US Laws as well as the US Constitution / Bill of Rights and took the Oath of Office to defend !
Please see Web Site the mission and goals are well defined.:  https://www.oathkeepers.org/

I find it somewhat amusing reading the crazy diatribes by the Looney Left agitators claiming Miltias are terrorists...well our Country was liberated by militias under General George Washington...maybe y'all should find a University that actually teaches US History before your foal mouths continue making the proverbial *ASS* out of yourselves!