Pages

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Domestic 'Gay' terror suspect fingers leftwing group


by: Bob Unruh 

A key leader of the Washington-based Family Research Council, the pro-family organization attacked by “gay” terrorist Floyd Lee Corkins, II, last year, says he is asking the government to stop utilizing the organization that likely influenced Corkins’ decision to attack innocent workers at FRC’s Washington office.
Retired Lt. Gen. William G. “Jerry” Boykin, the executive vice president of FRC and also a member of the board of WND.com, also is asking the U.S. news media to stop citing reports, statements and claims from the Southern Poverty Law Center, which he said legitimizes the organization.

The reason is that Corkins, who has pleaded guilty to a charge of domestic terrorism, confirmed to the FBI that he obtained information about the FRC from the “hate group” listing posted online by the SPLC, and that’s how he picked his target.
According to the government’s sentencing memorandum in the case against Corkins, who is now expected to be sentenced sometime in June, the “mass killing of innocent civilians” was averted narrowly by “the heroic intervening actions of Leonardo Johnson, a building manager/security guard who was seriously injured as a result.”
It happened when Corkins came to the FRC office intending to shoot everyone he could, but was stopped by Johnson, who wrestled Corkins into submission even though he had been shot in the arm.
See “Jihad in America: The Grand Deception,” which reveals the threat that is hidden in plain sight for Americans.
Among the counts to which Corkins has pleaded guilty is an “Act of [Domestic] Terrorism while Armed.”

During an FBI interview of Corkins after he was taken into custody, an agent asked Corkins, “What was your intention … You’re … a political activist you said?”
Corkins responded: “Yeah, I wanted to kill the people in the building and then smear a Chicken-fil-A sandwich on their face.”
FBI: “And you, what was your intention when you went in there with the gun?”
Corkins: “Uh, it was to kill as many people as I could.”
Key to the case, according to the government’s document, was that “He had identified the FRC as an anti-gay organization on the Southern Poverty Law Center website.”
FRC officials repeatedly have explained they adhere to a biblical perspective on homosexuality, but are not “anti-gay.”

“Consistent with his statement to the FBI, a … search of Corkins’s family computer revealed that on the afternoon of Sunday, August 12, Corkins used the computer to visit the Southern Poverty Law Center’s website, as well as the websites for the FRC and the second organization on his handwritten list. The FBI later recovered from Corkins’s home several printed Mapquest and Google maps, dated August 12, 2012, for directions to the FRC and the second organization, as well as the pad of stationary paper used by Corkins to create his handwritten list of targets,” the government explained.
A video that has been assembled, from security cameras and other sources, of Corkins’ attack on the FRC, as well as his videotaped confession, is to be released tomorrow, FRC officials said. FRC President Tony Perkins is scheduled to be on a Fox News program with Megyn Kelly, where it is to be aired for the first time.
A WND message left with Rebecca Sturtevant of the SPLC requesting a comment did not generate a response.

John Kerry sank to a new low this week..!


John Kerry (who vacated his Senate seat to become Secretary of State) sank to a new low this week.  In an effort to appease Palestinians, Kerry compared the loss of life from the terrorist attacks in Boston with Palestinian militants who lost their lives attacking the Israeli Navy.
As you may recall, Israel had previously erected a naval blockade to prevent terrorists in the Gaza strip from receiving weapons and other military supplies - which they were using to attack innocent Israeli citizens and soldiers, alike.
Supporters of Middle Eastern terrorist groups were furious with Israel and dispatched a boat with armed Palestinian activists to breach the Israeli blockade - they even beat Israeli naval personnel during the altercation.  When the Israeli Navy refused to back down, Palestinian activists took to the streets in protest, burning Israeli and American flags and promising death to Israelis and Americans alike:
How dare John Kerry compare the lost lives of innocent Americans at the Boston Marathon with armed Palestinian militants attempting to break Israel's blockade against terrorism supplies reaching the Gaza Strip!
There is one upside to all of this:  at least we finally rid ourselves of John Kerry being in the U.S. Senate, and now we have a chance to replace John Kerry with conservative Republican, Michael Sullivan.  We can replace this:
With this:
Above: "Proud Republican" Michael Sullivan served as U.S. Attorney
About Michael Sullivan:  A self-described "proud Republican," Michael Sullivan is an American success story.  Sullivan started as a stock clerk for the Gillette Corporation and after 16 years with the company he worked his way up to become Assistant to the President.
A graduate of Boston College and Suffolk University Law School, Sullivan has served as a Republican State Representative, a District Attorney and U.S. Attorney.  While U.S. Attorney, Sullivan helped prosecute a number of terrorism cases including the infamous "Shoe Bomber" Richard Reid.
Above: Michael Sullivan helped bring the "Shoe Bomber" to Justice
We still need to raise $3,863 by Monday morning for our next round of ad buys in Massachusetts.
You can make a contribution to our independent expenditure campaign supporting conservative Republican Michael Sullivan for U.S. Senate by making a contribution of as little as $5 up to the maximum allowed contribution of $5,000 online - HERE.

Gutsy federal judge whacks Obama


by: Garth Kant 

A federal judge has a message for President Obama: Stop bypassing Congress on immigration.
Obama issued a directive in June 2012 halting the deportation of many young illegal aliens after Congress refused to pass the DREAM Act, which would have provided conditional permanent residency to young illegals.
A federal judge in Dallas is now threatening to reverse that directive.
U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor said Tuesday that he will likely rule in favor of a lawsuit seeking to overturn the new policy. He has asked both sides to file additional arguments by May 6.
The administration’s policy directs U.S. Immigration and Customs, or ICE, agents to defer deportation for illegal aliens under 30 who entered the country before the age of 16, are in school or have a high school diploma, haven’t been convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor or multiple misdemeanors and are not a threat to public safety or national security.

The ICE agent union challenged the policy, arguing that the Obama administration is disciplining agents who enforce federal immigration law.
The president of that union, the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council, also said the policy is being abused.
In his April 8 testimony, Christopher L. Crane said, “Officers are applying the directive to people detained in jails, not kids in school.”
He told the court, “It is now the story in the jails for aliens to use to avoid arrest and deportation.”
Those aliens appear to be taking advantage of the policy with great success. National Review found, “Since the policy took effect in August 2012, the Obama administration has approved 268,361 applications for ‘deferred action’ status, and denied just 1,377 – an approval rate of 99.5 percent.”

While critics argue the policy is ineffective in securing the border, Judge O’Connor indicated it’s also illegal for the Obama administration to tell immigration agents not to arrest an illegal alien who is a low priority.
“The court finds that DHS (Department of Homeland Security) does not have discretion to refuse to initiate removal proceedings,” Judge O’Connor wrote.
O’Connor issued a court order stating that Congress, not the president, sets priorities for arresting illegal aliens and that the law requires them to face deportation.
A recent analysis by Politico based on U.S. Census and Pew Research Center estimates of illegal alien populations by state brings into question the Democrats’ motivation for what they call comprehensive immigration reform – also dubbed “amnesty” by critics.
After crunching the numbers, Politico said the immigration proposal now in Congress would give Democrats a decisive advantage at the polls for a generation or more.
It would happen by “pumping as many as 11 million new Hispanic voters into the electorate a decade from now in ways that, if current trends hold, would produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states they now win easily.”

William Gheen, president of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, or ALIPAC, told WND the legislation would “completely wipe out the center-right group of people that have governed America for over 200 years. And it would replace true conservatives with illegal immigrants willing to vote for anyone willing to give them more power and control.”
Gheen believes the DHS policy is in response to a drop in illegal immigration after the economy began plummeting into recession in 2008 and states began cracking down on illegal immigration.
“If the ICE agents can win their case and we can stop amnesty, the American public may get one more shot at this in the 2014 election, in which case we could restore the reversal of illegal immigration,” he said.
Gheen said ALIPAC may file a friend-of-the-court brief to help the ICE agents’ union.
“To us its very clear that the U.S. Constitution says immigration is the purview of the U.S. Congress. And the fact that Obama’s memo, or decree, so perfectly emulates failed legislation reinforces our belief this should have been done legislatively, it if were done at all.”

Gheen added, “[W]e have contended for years, and accurately so, that those very powerful groups behind the deadly and costly illegal immigrant invasion of the United States are not concerned about democracy; they’re all about authoritarian governance. It’s just part of what it’s going to be like if they ever get their group of 20 million illegal immigrants on board as a new voting bloc.”
He said those “powerful groups” include Fox News.
“I know that Fox News is pushing amnesty. They’ve had very few anti-amnesty people on at all, except for Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin. All of their main hosts, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity, have come out in support of amnesty,” he added.
Gheen also cited what he called bogus immigration polls by Fox News.
“This time, the amnesty battle is different because two high-profile groups have run designer polls and paid for the results, with Fox News and the Associated Press trying to convince Americans that if they’re against amnesty they are in the minority. It is a very powerful and Orwellian thing that we have to deal with,” Gheen contended.
He added, “We have a whole list of polls showing our position of enforcement rather than amnesty are supported by a supermajority of Americans, and we’ve been collecting those polls for eight years at Alipac.us.”
The ALIPAC website currently features a Reuters poll released Tuesday showing “more than half of U.S. citizens believe that most or all of the country’s 11 million illegal immigrants should be deported.”